cool5 Posted May 7, 2010 Report Share Posted May 7, 2010 Still need to Undead and dark golem. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gwarg1 Posted May 7, 2010 Report Share Posted May 7, 2010 I actually made a card with the same exact pic as Stone Golem. None of them have effects and ocg errors on all the fusions Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NeXodus Posted May 7, 2010 Report Share Posted May 7, 2010 For the Vanilla Golems, I don't know why you would even have those in your deck, They're useless 'cause they only have a 1500 ATK and a 1700 DEF and they're level 5 so you would need to tribute summon it. I could easily summon a level 4 monster with 1800 ATK and woop 'em. The OCG, well, your a newb apparently when it comes to OCG cause it's awful. Fusions should either have an effect or just the monsters you need to fusion summon with. 1/10 EDIT: As for the Ritual monster, it needs an effect period. It also needs a Ritual Spell Card. It can't be a F****ING VANILLA. That is not right man, have you even played YuGiOh? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghoulish Posted May 7, 2010 Report Share Posted May 7, 2010 i dont get it u post cards here to get comments and feedback...we give feedback andiu post more cards the same as before... man if u want to make these cards half realistic in this day and age, a must is 1900 ATK and level 4 for the basic monsters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wrathos Posted May 7, 2010 Report Share Posted May 7, 2010 I don't care about the level to attack ratio. I just care that the card lore is structured improperly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FSBolthof Posted May 7, 2010 Report Share Posted May 7, 2010 Only the pictures are good. NO EFFECTS, 5 STARS AND SO LESS ATK AND DEF!!!!PURPLE IS A FUSION!!! JUST EVERYTHING IS WRONG-500/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.