why apple COMPUTERS sucks

[Lyfe.]

Catterpillars can hax apples. Your argument is invalid.

 

AHH! :D

 

<3

[Kaisu]

Damnit, I came here expecting myfoodlooksfunny.com

 

I iz dissapoint.

 

I'm suprised I read the whole rant in about half a minute.

 

[spoiler=Now, due to this banned member's thread still being active, I have generated a rant.... xD I'm feeling a fad coming.]Where, oh where, should I begin telling you about how stubborn YCM is? How about here: YCM is driven by its urge for power, its love of force, and its dream of conquest. As a preliminary, I want to reinvigorate our collective commitment to building and maintaining a sensitive, tolerant, and humane community. Because the foundation of teetotalism is terribly flawed, anything based on it will also be terribly flawed. That explains why YCM's allegations are so longiloquent. In fact, not only are they longiloquent but they fail to take into consideration the way that we can divide YCM's denunciations into three categories: shrewish, argumentative, and short-sighted.

 

How did YCM get so whiney? I have my theories, but they're only speculation. At any rate, just as night follows day, it will spoon-feed us its pabulum as soon as our backs are turned. Is anyone else out there as struck as I am by YCM's utter disregard for morality and humanity? The reason I ask is that if you're like most people you just shrug your shoulders whenever you hear about YCM's latest strictures. When your shoulders get tired of shrugging I hope you'll realize that you'd think that someone would have done something by now to thwart YCM's plans to lead me down a path of pain and suffering. Unfortunately, most people are quite happy to "go along to get along" and are rather reluctant to defy the international enslavement of entire peoples. It is imperative that we inform such people that YCM's balmy perversions leave the current power structure untouched while simultaneously killing countless children through starvation and disease. Are these children its enemies? A complete answer to that question would take more space than I can afford, so I'll have to give you a simplified answer. For starters, if we don't soon tell it to stop what it's doing, it will proceed with its demented policies, considerably emboldened by our lack of resistance. We will have tacitly given it our permission to do so.

 

To spread its message of classism, YCM frequently solicits assistance from illiterate wastrels, crass skinheads, and other well-rewarded notables of exploitation and arrogance, superficiality and self-indulgence. Myth is a stronger force than rationality. What are the lessons for us in this? First, it's that its efforts to concoct labels for people, objects, and behaviors in order to manipulate the public's opinion of them have touched the lives of every person in this country. And second, it habitually reads negative meanings into innocuous remarks. The destruction of the Tower of Babel, be it a literal truth, an allegory, or a mere story based upon cultural archetypes, illustrates this truth plainly.

 

The term "idiot savant" comes to mind when thinking of YCM. Admittedly, that term applies only halfway to it, which is why I avouch that I feel that there are in fact many people who possess the intelligence, wisdom, talent, and ability to make the world safe for democracy. My goal is to locate those people and encourage them to help me shelter initially unpopular truths from suppression, enabling them to ultimately win out through competition in the marketplace of ideas. YCM accuses me of being a liar. The only proven liar around here, however, is YCM. Only a die-hard liar like YCM could claim that its endeavors are Right with a capital R. The truth, in case you haven't already figured it out, is that it wants nothing less than to sentence more and more people to poverty, prison, and early death. Its cohorts then wonder, "What's wrong with that?" Well, there's not much to be done with prudish geeks who can't figure out what's wrong with that, but the rest of us can plainly see that YCM wants us to believe that the majority of filthy calumniators are heroes, if not saints. How stupid does it think we are? I have asked God for answers, but it appears that this is a closed-book test. Let me simply suggest, therefore, that YCM deeply believes that principles don't matter. Meanwhile, back on Earth, the truth is very simple: YCM's protests all stem from one, simple, faulty premise—that trees cause more pollution than automobiles do.

 

There's no mystery about it, no more room for fairy tales, just the knowledge that YCM just reported that its activities are on the up-and-up. Do you think that that's merely sloppy reporting on YCM's part? I don't. I think that it's a deliberate attempt to shank the working class in the back to keep the cash spigots flowing.

 

If YCM wanted to, it could reduce our modern, civilized, industrialized society to a state of mindless, primitive barbarism. It could exercise control through indirect coercion or through psychological pressure or manipulation. And it could project a stream of petulant images of death, sex, disaster, material goods, celebrities, and other fixtures in a mock-Olympian firmament. We must unquestionably not allow YCM to do any of these. As you know, YCM's operatives are cantankerous, litigious warlords (literally!). Oh, you didn't know that? That's because YCM has been trying to keep that fact hidden from the public so as to prevent people from realizing that it's not averse to violating strongly held principles regarding deferral of current satisfaction for long-term gains. To pretend otherwise is nothing but hypocrisy and unwillingness to face the more unpleasant realities of life.

 

YCM's janissaries are too lazy to replace today's chaos and lack of vision with order and a supreme sense of purpose. They just want to sit back, fasten their mouths on the public teats, and casually forget that YCM's repressive form of lexiphanicism is like a forest fire. Once it is started, none can set bounds to the resulting conflagration. The only option is to extend the compass of democracy to wild primates. While doing so won't put a stop to lexiphanicism, it will demonstrate decisively that YCM teaches workshops on academicism. Students who have been through the program compare it to a Communist re-education camp.

 

We were put on this planet to be active, to struggle, and to make YCM answer for its wrongdoings. We were not put here to encourage people to leave their spouses, kill their children, practice witchcraft, destroy capitalism, and become uncompanionable franions, as YCM might profess. YCM has written more than its fair share of lengthy, over-worded, pseudo-intellectual tripe. In all such instances it conveniently overlooks the fact that it doesn't want us to reach out for things with permanence, things beyond wealth and comfort and pleasure, things that have real meaning. It would rather we settle for the meatless bone of denominationalism. Never mind that I am interested in facts, not in paregoric for YCM's stooges. What's really important is that YCM has nothing but contempt for you, and you don't even know it. That's why I feel obligated to inform you that its hangers-on like to say, "Everyone and everything discriminates against YCM—including the writing on the bathroom stalls." Such frothy eloquence neither convinces nor satisfies me. If someone wants me to believe something manipulative like that, that person will have to show me some concrete evidence. Meanwhile, I intend to show you that there is one crucial fact that we must not overlook if we are to perceive our current situation as it is, rather than in the anamorphosis of some "ideology" such as Chekism or isolationism. Specifically, what I just wrote is not based on merely a single experience or anecdote. Rather, it is based upon the wisdom of accumulated years, spanning two continents, and proven by the fact that if my memory serves me correctly, YCM has been trying to conceal its plans to purge the land of every non-loathsome person, gene, idea, and influence. Fortunately, the truth about its raving cop-outs is spreading like a jungle fire. Soon, everyone will know that in a recent essay, YCM stated that every featherless biped, regardless of intelligence, personal achievement, moral character, sense of responsibility, or sanity, should be given the power to humiliate, subjugate, and eventually eliminate everyone who wants to focus on what unites rather than divides us. Since the arguments it made in the rest of its essay are based in part on that assumption, it should be aware that it just isn't true. Not only that, but you should be sure to let me know your ideas about how to deal with it. I am eager to listen to your ideas and I truly hope that I can grasp their essentials, evaluate their potential, look for flaws, provide suggestions, absorb feedback, suggest improvements, and then put the ideas into effect. Only then can we make a cause célèbre out of exposing YCM's harangues for what they really are.

 

The purpose of this letter is far greater than to prove to you how slimy and closed-minded YCM has become. The purpose of this letter is to get you to start thinking for yourself, to start thinking about how it maintains that all it takes to solve our social woes are shotgun marriages, heavy-handed divorce laws, and a return to some mythical 1950s Shangri-la. That's not just a lie but is actually the exact opposite of the truth—and YCM knows it. Why is YCM deliberately turning the truth on its head like that? It is bootless to speculate on the matter but it should be noted that this is not the first time I've wanted to deal with the relevant facts. But it is the first time I realized that I am now in a position to define what I mean when I say that this is a fine example of what I've been talking about. What I mean is that a great many of us don't want YCM to annihilate a person's personality, individuality, will, and character. Still, we feel a prodigious societal pressure to smile, to be nice, and not to object to its picayunish asseverations.

 

Should we worry that YCM wants to achieve total world domination? In a word, yes. And that's not just because it has arrived at the highest degree of imposture, but also because YCM says it's going to change children's values from those taught in the home to those considered chic by wicked, paltry wankers in the immediate years ahead. Is it out of its garrulous mind? The answer is fairly obvious when you consider that it contends that its blessing is the equivalent of a papal imprimatur. What planet is it from? The planet Unambitious? Before you answer, let me point out that YCM doubtlessly intends to deplete the ozone layer. The direful sequence of that result, so flagrantly churlish and grungy in itself, is that the worst kinds of incomprehensible, dim-witted phonies I've ever seen will increase alienation and delinquency among our young people when you least expect it. We must grant people the freedom to pursue any endeavor they deem fitting to their skills, talent, and interest. We must outline YCM's troubling pattern of lying, incompetence, and carelessness. And we must deliver new information about YCM's treasonous jibes. Please join me in incorporating these words into our living credo.

 

 

[Pikachu]

This is to voice my dissatisfaction with Wynn's proposed social programs. One of my objectives for this letter is to celebrate knowledge and truth for the sake of knowledge and truth. I, hardheaded cynic that I am, don't care what others say about Wynn. He's still salacious, intolerant, and he intends to twist the history, sociology, and anthropology disseminated by our mass media and in our children's textbooks. For the sake of argument, let's pretend that he is not a ridiculous pamphleteer. There are various philosophical arguments that one could use to contradict that assuption, but perhaps the best involves the observation that if Wynn can one day promote group-think attitudes over individual insights then the long descent into night is sure to follow.

 

The very genesis of Wynn's obnoxious obiter dicta is in fetishism. And it seems to me to be a neat bit of historic justice that he will eventually himself be destroyed by fetishism. If Wynn continues to reduce social and cultural awareness to a dictated set of guidelines to follow, the result can be a tone-deafness, a cluelessness, on matters that are at the center of experience for vast segments of the population. It is imperative that all of us in this community exemplify the principles of honor, duty, loyalty, and courage. This cannot occur unless there is a true spirit of respect and an appreciation of differences.

 

The justification Wynn gave for creating an ideological climate that will enable him to plunge the whole of Christendom into wars and chaos was one of the most fastidious justifications I've ever heard. It was so fastidious, in fact, that I will not repeat it here. Even without hearing the details you can still see my point quite clearly: Wynn wants us to believe that violence and prejudice are funny. How stupid does he think we are? Perhaps the answer is best saved for another letter. Let me simply note that I wouldn't judge Wynn's zealots too harshly. They're truly just cannon fodder for Wynn's plot to supplant national heroes with horny, sniffish slackers. If anyone should propose a practical scheme for protecting the interests of the general public against the greed and unreason of mean-spirited, postmodernist long-haired hippies, I should be quite disposed to incur almost any degree of expense to accomplish that object. In the meantime, let me point out that teenagers who want to shock their parents sometimes maintain—with a straight face—that nit-picky, hypersensitive big-mouths should be fêted at wine-and-cheese fund-raisers. Fortunately, most parents don't fall for this fraud because they know that Wynn is absolutely determined to believe that honor counts for nothing, and he's not about to let facts or reason get in his way. I would like to go on, but I do have to keep this letter short. So I'll wrap it up by saying that my conscience compels me to provide some balance to Wynn's one-sided ideals.

 

Nuff said. O wait, he's banned. Oh well. >_>

[Noahmeta]

...kinda disappoint at rant generated text... wasted time lol

 

 

I'd rather have a simplistic easy to use computer than one that can get virus'.

 

simplicity =/= complexity

true

but i would rather' date=' IMO, be an intelligent person who understands the difficulty of making the PC be truly you, rather than a Mac which tells you what you want to be, just because it's [i']simpler [/i]that way. You can't get Viruses on a PC unless you click on Ads, answer Spam, watch Porn, or generate one yourself. -_- And even if you want (LOL) to do any of these things, there are things called Free Anti-Virus Software (Avast!, AVG, etc) which work perfectly fine in protecting your a**.

 

In other words, originality counts in PC, in a Mac, it's half the features, twice the glam, triple the price.

---

[WTF]

Summarize.

[Luna Lovegood]

summarize? ok

 

By now everyone should have heard about Apple and its biased deeds. In case you haven't heard or have even forgotten' date=' allow me to refresh your memory. The full truth of my conclusion I shall develop in the course of this letter but the conclusion's general outline is that Apple spouts the same bile in everything it writes, making only slight modifications to suit the issue at hand. The issue it's excited about this week is philistinism, which says to me that I want nothing more—or less—than to take the mechanisms, language, ideology, and phraseology for determining what is right and what is wrong out of the hands of Apple and its surrogates and put them back in the hands of ordinary people. To that task I have consecrated my life and I invite you to do likewise.

 

The problem is, I admit I have a tendency to become a bit insensitive whenever I rebuke Apple for trying to welsh on all types of agreements. While I am desirous of mending this tiny personality flaw, if I thought that Apple's expostulations had even a snowball's chance in Hell of doing anything good for anyone, then I wouldn't be so critical. As they stand, however, I can conclude only that society must soon decide either to test the assumptions that underlie Apple's overgeneralizations or else to let Apple deny us the opportunity to restore the ancient traditions that it has abandoned. The decision is one of life or death, peaceful existence or perpetual social fever. I can hope only that those in charge realize that wherever scary tin-pot tyrants are seen forcing me to live lower than dirt, Apple is there. Wherever damnable so-called experts are found giving rise to the most passive-aggressive swaggerers you'll ever see, Apple is lurking nearby. Wherever sinful disinformation artists are observed challenging all I stand for, Apple will no doubt be in the vicinity. I defy any coincidence theorist to try to explain away those observations. Clearly, we are a nation of prostitutes. By this I mean that as long as we are fat, warm, and dry we don't care what Apple does. It is precisely that lack of caring that explains why I'm willing to accept that Bulverism is a growing threat to society and should be outlawed. I'm even willing to accept that its randy excuses are an affront to every concept of freedom that our men and women in uniform have sacrificed so much to protect. But its attendants' thinking is fenced in by many constraints. Their minds are not free because they dare not be. I challenge you to ponder this subject with the broadest vision possible.

[/quote']

 

You forgot to actually refresh my memory

[Father Wolf]

Me: Is that some kinda new computer? Must be able to do a lot.

Store Clerk: Not really. It just a regular computer just made to look nice.

Me: and u want people to pay for something that just looks nice. You think people will actually do this?

Clerk: A sheet load my friend! The are tons of dumb fukkas in the world who are more interested in looks than actual performance.

Me: So what is it called.

Clerk: a Mac

[PowerlinX]

Nice rant gen.

 

Apple made the iPod, iPad, and they're Macs are the win.

[-Athena-]

don't hate apple, kind of like it actually but i just PC cause it fits me more

[Poseidon©]

I don't intend to discomfit my readers, but I do need to point out that Mr. Wynn has garnered enough support to step on other people's toes but not enough support to ensure that all of the news we receive is filtered through a narrow ideological prism. If you disagree with my claim that people are looking for answers, not ideology, then read no further. Maybe I'm in the minority here, but it seems to me that if you think that cultural tradition has never contributed a single thing to the advancement of knowledge or understanding then you're suffering from very serious nearsightedness. You're focusing too much on what Wynn wants you to see and failing to observe many other things of much greater importance such as that if you're not part of the solution then you're part of the problem.

 

Isn't it odd that bumptious sideshow barkers, whose sanctimonious, drugged-out lifestyle will drag men out of their beds in the dead of night and castrate them in the coming days, are immune from censure? Why is that? That's the question that perplexes me the most because Wynn refers to a variety of things using the word "conventionalization". Translating this bit of jargon into English isn't easy. Basically, he's saying that he can scare us by using big words like "individualistic", which we all know is patently absurd. At any rate, relative to just a few years ago, pestilential malcontents are nearly ten times as likely to believe that freedom must be abolished in order for people to be more secure and comfortable. This is neither a coincidence nor simply a sign of the times. Rather, it reflects a sophisticated, psychological warfare program designed by Wynn to burn books.

 

According to the latest scientific evidence, there is something grievously wrong with those testy bribe-seekers who irrationalize thinking on every issue. Shame on the lot of them! It's possible that Wynn's vassals can conceive of nothing but soulless defenses of his vindictive propositions. However, I cannot speculate about that possibility here because I need to devote more space to a description of how Wynn has nothing but contempt for you, and you don't even know it. That's why I feel obligated to inform you that the basal lie that underlies all of his lawless histrionics is that the best way to serve one's country is to dispense bread and circuses to abysmal fiends to entice them to make bargains with the devil. Translation: There's no difference between normal people like you and me and oleaginous, picayunish lie-virtuosi. I doubt you need any help from me to identify the supreme idiocy of those views, but you should nevertheless be aware that I don't care what others say about Wynn. He's still self-serving, noisome, and he intends to demand that Earth submit to the dominion of patronizing yokels. I've left out many criticisms of Mr. Wynn from this wailing wall of a letter. Nevertheless, I contend that it's a start—a philosophical space where we can plant a new flag symbolizing all that is wrong with Wynn.

 

lol.

 

This is fun.

 

But at least Apple computers don't HAVE virus's currently.

[TrickyPooBoy]

I'm too lazy to read so I'm gonna summarize it for all of us.

READ THIS

YOU CAN'T HAXX APPLE BUT YOU CAN HAXX PC!

 

This.

 

I'd rather have a simplistic easy to use computer than one that can get virus'.

 

This.[/again]

[Grunt Issun]

iiiiim baaaaaaaack......hi

 

I WAS BANNED FOR THE REST OF THE MONTH BECUASE OF THIS AND IT WASNT LOCKED!!! WTF MODS!!! WTF!!!