sasori_puppet_master Posted May 26, 2010 Report Share Posted May 26, 2010 cards:41 Monsters (25)3 REDMD2 JD 2 prime material dragon2 gragonith1 celestia2 blizzard dragon2 kokkai meriu drago2 REW2 garoth2 jain 2 lyla2 ryko1 lumina Spells (11)3 solar recharge2 dragon's mirror2 book of moon1 CotLB1 storm1 trunade 1 future fusion Traps (5)2 bottomless1 mirror1 TT1 solemn Extra Deck (3)3x FGD/FHD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kyosuke Kiryu Posted May 26, 2010 Report Share Posted May 26, 2010 5 different names for JD is barely enough. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fizzy™ Posted May 26, 2010 Report Share Posted May 26, 2010 5 different names for JD is barely enough. Agreed Maybe add a Lumina?And -1 Lyla +1 Wulf? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sasori_puppet_master Posted May 28, 2010 Author Report Share Posted May 28, 2010 5 different names for JD is barely enough. Agreed Maybe add a Lumina?And -1 Lyla +1 Wulf? lumina is in the side deck and wulf (to me) is more like a ls only monster...just saying (besides, i needed room for dagons)... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fizzy™ Posted May 28, 2010 Report Share Posted May 28, 2010 Well JD needs 5 LS monsters with different names in the Grave.The max you can have is 6 since that's how many with different names are in your deck.If you draw one you have to be really lucky to meet the specifications required to summon it when using this deck.So to make JD more playable in this deck you should have more LS variants.That's all I was trying to say. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sasori_puppet_master Posted June 1, 2010 Author Report Share Posted June 1, 2010 Well JD needs 5 LS monsters with different names in the Grave.The max you can have is 6 since that's how many with different names are in your deck.If you draw one you have to be really lucky to meet the specifications required to summon it when using this deck.So to make JD more playable in this deck you should have more LS variants.That's all I was trying to say. You only need 4 LS for JD but i know what you meen... what should i neg for lumina? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fizzy™ Posted June 1, 2010 Report Share Posted June 1, 2010 Well JD needs 5 LS monsters with different names in the Grave.The max you can have is 6 since that's how many with different names are in your deck.If you draw one you have to be really lucky to meet the specifications required to summon it when using this deck.So to make JD more playable in this deck you should have more LS variants.That's all I was trying to say. You only need 4 LS for JD but i know what you meen... what should i neg for lumina? Oh sorry it's 4 LS monsters. It's up to you what you want to neg.I'd take out a Lyla since you have 2 of them and Lumina is one of the best LS monsters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ihop Posted June 1, 2010 Report Share Posted June 1, 2010 2 Garoth?Neg a Garoth for a Lumina, maybe? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zauls Posted June 2, 2010 Report Share Posted June 2, 2010 2 Garoth?Neg a Garoth for a Lumina' date=' maybe?[/quote'] This. Also, you may wanna tech a Prime Material Dragon. -1 Garoth-1 Blizzard Dragon+1 PMD+1 Lumina Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sasori_puppet_master Posted June 3, 2010 Author Report Share Posted June 3, 2010 2 Garoth?Neg a Garoth for a Lumina' date=' maybe?[/quote'] This. Also, you may wanna tech a Prime Material Dragon. -1 Garoth-1 Blizzard Dragon+1 PMD+1 Lumina I'll think about it. for now, i'll fet rid of a lyla...maybe... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zauls Posted June 3, 2010 Report Share Posted June 3, 2010 2 Garoth?Neg a Garoth for a Lumina' date=' maybe?[/quote'] This. Also, you may wanna tech a Prime Material Dragon. -1 Garoth-1 Blizzard Dragon+1 PMD+1 Lumina I'll think about it. for now, i'll fet rid of a lyla...maybe... Well ok, but just to help you think; Lumina is essential in LS, it is another JD target and it has an amazing effect. Prime Material Dragon dumps stuff in the Grave like maybe dead Wulfs or more JD fuel, it is also a fantastic protection effect and it stops stuff like DAD, JD (in the mirror matches) and Vortex etc. Also, it is obviously REDMDable and Honestable (though I see you are not running Honest, maybe consider it). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sasori_puppet_master Posted June 6, 2010 Author Report Share Posted June 6, 2010 2 Garoth?Neg a Garoth for a Lumina' date=' maybe?[/quote'] This. Also, you may wanna tech a Prime Material Dragon. -1 Garoth-1 Blizzard Dragon+1 PMD+1 Lumina I'll think about it. for now, i'll fet rid of a lyla...maybe... Well ok, but just to help you think; Lumina is essential in LS, it is another JD target and it has an amazing effect. Prime Material Dragon dumps stuff in the Grave like maybe dead Wulfs or more JD fuel, it is also a fantastic protection effect and it stops stuff like DAD, JD (in the mirror matches) and Vortex etc. Also, it is obviously REDMDable and Honestable (though I see you are not running Honest, maybe consider it). Good point. What do you suggest I get rid of? (I kinda like the 3 blizzard) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sasori_puppet_master Posted June 7, 2010 Author Report Share Posted June 7, 2010 bump (changes made)I... -2 genesis+2 prime material Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zauls Posted June 7, 2010 Report Share Posted June 7, 2010 I would also try and run 2 Book of Moon. How about:-1 MST-1 Dragon's Mirror (dead draws too much @3)+2 BoM I have also noticed an absence of Future Fusion... *Facepalm*-1 MST+1 Future Fusion Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sasori_puppet_master Posted June 7, 2010 Author Report Share Posted June 7, 2010 I would also try and run 2 Book of Moon. How about:-1 MST-1 Dragon's Mirror (dead draws too much @3)+2 BoM I have also noticed an absence of Future Fusion... *Facepalm*-1 MST+1 Future Fusion I just assumed that future fusion + LS = deckout, that's why i excluded it. As for BoM, i thought clearing the back field would be more important, but i'll side it to try this... I also liked the idea of 3 d-mirror because of all the LS effects also...but if it works like this, then i'll keep it this way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sasori_puppet_master Posted June 8, 2010 Author Report Share Posted June 8, 2010 bump Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sasori_puppet_master Posted June 10, 2010 Author Report Share Posted June 10, 2010 bump Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.