Brendano Harns Posted May 30, 2010 Report Share Posted May 30, 2010 [align=center] Well, it's been awhile since I've visited this section of the forum. If you would actually like to tell me something helpful relating to tag making or tell me whether I have improved, pm me. I would enjoy to hear from you. But the the flamers, n00bs, and all around annoying members? Well, you can just...Nevermind. I forgot for a second that there are innocent children on this forum. [spoiler=Changed Render, with some extra modifications.] Done as a request. [spoiler=V2] [spoiler=V1] Meep. [/align] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest JoshIcy Posted May 30, 2010 Report Share Posted May 30, 2010 I'll try and be nicer than usual lol... Your size is 400x200 px. Try and work with something more like 320x132 or around there. You'll have lots of focus while minimalizing excessive details. Your render/focal is fogged, which isn't good (even when that is the intent as it will look natural). I'd actually duplicate your Render, Lighten it (keeping contrast levels close to the lighten so you dont lose detail on lower Opacs) and set to about 50% Normal Opac. Or around there... Your focal should be somewhat proportional to the size of the Signature, but still not too large. Yours is super small =/. Your BG for this kind of Render should be pretty solid in colors, yours is far too erratic. Blah .-."... Hard to explain whats wrong constructively without editing it myself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brendano Harns Posted June 1, 2010 Author Report Share Posted June 1, 2010 lol I know you come with the best of intentions Icy. I've just grown tired of getting comments along the lines of: "l00kz gud," and "Meh," and "it suck becuz u fail at life and it lookz bad." Will try. Thanks. ;D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chairman ali Posted June 1, 2010 Report Share Posted June 1, 2010 It's not bad. Some of the textures you have used destroy the purpose of the background effects. The rain/droplet textures infront should be removed. I am also not liking the motion blur you added, or the bigger sized render in the background. I suggest trying to increase lighting in the background. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brendano Harns Posted June 1, 2010 Author Report Share Posted June 1, 2010 Thanks guise. V2 up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TrickyPooBoy Posted June 3, 2010 Report Share Posted June 3, 2010 That's one of mah favorite cards! :D I like it, bg seems boring. After all, it is a Machine and could use a more neonic bg. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JG. Posted June 3, 2010 Report Share Posted June 3, 2010 No sh*t sherlock. Eh, V2 is efinitly better than V1, but still sucks. You have no blending, and too much empty space. Also, the overall tag is too dark IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harhar Posted June 3, 2010 Report Share Posted June 3, 2010 Eh, I'm just gonna go ahead and say it sucks. Why? Because I can and no one will argue otherwise because I'm so damn special. Seriously, It's messy and I'm quite sure I can still see the rain-drops-on-window stock you used. Who uses yugioh renders anymore? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TrickyPooBoy Posted June 3, 2010 Report Share Posted June 3, 2010 Fuzzie does. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harhar Posted June 3, 2010 Report Share Posted June 3, 2010 Fuzzie does. I'm sorry but I don't remember asking you a question. Speak when you're spoken to. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JG. Posted June 3, 2010 Report Share Posted June 3, 2010 Fuzzie does. I'm sorry but I don't remember asking you a question. Speak when you're spoken to. Who uses yugioh renders anymore? You asked a question with no specific recipent, so anyone can answer. Also, you're back =D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brendano Harns Posted June 3, 2010 Author Report Share Posted June 3, 2010 No sh*t sherlock. Eh' date=' V2 is efinitly better than V1, but still sucks. You have no blending, and too much empty space. Also, the overall tag is too dark IMO.[/quote'] Kthanks. ^_^ I have a light screen, so... Anyways, for the space. Should I add a light effect towards the right? Eh' date=' I'm just gonna go ahead and say it sucks. Why? Because I can and no one will argue otherwise because I'm so damn special. Seriously, It's messy and I'm quite sure I can still see the rain-drops-on-window stock you used. Who uses yugioh renders anymore?[/quote'] K w/e, congrats on being special. Did you only look at V1? And BTW, if you learn to read, you'll see that it was done as a request. ;D Fuzzie does. Dude. For seriously. WTF. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
'tyleR Posted June 3, 2010 Report Share Posted June 3, 2010 You should use a more broad focal for more appeal and useful concepts. You really won't go far if you just stick to drawn renders or YGO renders. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brendano Harns Posted June 3, 2010 Author Report Share Posted June 3, 2010 A focal that takes up more space, or a a render+more effects for the focal? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
'tyleR Posted June 3, 2010 Report Share Posted June 3, 2010 Just something that allows for more broad concepts and execution to be used. Such as video game renders, stocks, anime, real people, ETC. Get my meaning? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harhar Posted June 3, 2010 Report Share Posted June 3, 2010 Fuzzie does. I'm sorry but I don't remember asking you a question. Speak when you're spoken to. Who uses yugioh renders anymore? You asked a question with no specific recipent' date=' so anyone can answer. Also, you're back =D[/quote'] Damn, JG, I was just trying to give the guy a hard time D: @Fuzzie, if you learn how to not suck, you'd make better tags. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest JoshIcy Posted June 3, 2010 Report Share Posted June 3, 2010 @Fuzzie' date=' if you learn how to not suck, you'd make better tags.[/quote'] If you learned how to give advice while trying to be nice, people wouldn't suck.Kinda counterproductive dont you think? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harhar Posted June 3, 2010 Report Share Posted June 3, 2010 @Fuzzie' date=' if you learn how to not suck, you'd make better tags.[/quote'] If you learned how to give advice while trying to be nice, people wouldn't suck.Kinda counterproductive dont you think? If you learned how to stop being a whiny jabroni, people wouldn't call you a whiny jabroni.Kinda counterproductive dont you think? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest JoshIcy Posted June 3, 2010 Report Share Posted June 3, 2010 @Fuzzie' date=' if you learn how to not suck, you'd make better tags.[/quote'] If you learned how to give advice while trying to be nice, people wouldn't suck.Kinda counterproductive dont you think? If you learned how to stop being a whiny b****, people wouldn't call you a whiny b****.Kinda counterproductive dont you think? 2 wrongs don't make a right, I already gave my advice for it and I did damn well. (Trust me, V1 was TERRIBLE! >_> lol). And no, whiny bleep is relative only to the person who sees it that way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brendano Harns Posted June 3, 2010 Author Report Share Posted June 3, 2010 Just something that allows for more broad concepts and execution to be used. Such as video game renders' date=' stocks, anime, real people, ETC. Get my meaning?[/quote'] Yeah. Thanks. :] @Fuzzie' date=' if you learn how to not suck, you'd make better tags.[/quote'] Dammit, I knew I was forgetting something. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JG. Posted June 3, 2010 Report Share Posted June 3, 2010 Fuzzie does. I'm sorry but I don't remember asking you a question. Speak when you're spoken to. Who uses yugioh renders anymore? You asked a question with no specific recipent' date=' so anyone can answer. Also, you're back =D[/quote'] Damn, JG, I was just trying to give the guy a hard time D: @Fuzzie, if you learn how to not suck, you'd make better tags. I know bud, I know. But I was just trying to give you a hard time, because at the time I wrote that, I was beyond bored. Sorreh D: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Night Posted June 4, 2010 Report Share Posted June 4, 2010 Would be alot better with a different render, better than your others, if that was what you were looking for. I personally would not use a yugioh render with this tag, actually i wouldn't use one at all, but, for ANY render try not adding a "glow" effect around it. Seeing as though it doesn't blend well, and makes the render look out of place. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brendano Harns Posted June 4, 2010 Author Report Share Posted June 4, 2010 The red glow came with the render, but that's a good tip for future reference. Thankies. ;) Yeah, the render I got sucked. I going to switch it out for a different render. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Night Posted June 4, 2010 Report Share Posted June 4, 2010 Ahh, well any render with an outline is not a great choice. But switching the render would help. Also dont forget to try blending as well as adding a decent light source. Just try it, could turn out pretty good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brendano Harns Posted June 4, 2010 Author Report Share Posted June 4, 2010 Thanks. ^_^ I added a light sorce, changed the render, and overall tried to make it blend a little better...I think it's definately better than the first two. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.