Jump to content

Mahandra VS Maadd1 !! END I WIN


MibeR

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 59
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Wow both does cards are great their both fairly equal both Im going to have to for mahandra because madd1´s card had peircing wrote on it and I have never seen peircing wrote on a real yu gi oh card

 

wow thats a vote i deserved to lose........good reason....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4-2 gratz maha, i would have liked to know how it would of gone if this vote didnt take place:

 

Wow both does cards are great their both fairly equal both Im going to have to for mahandra because madd1´s card had peircing wrote on it and I have never seen peircing wrote on a real yu gi oh card

Link to comment
Share on other sites

maad wrote peircing.not piercing damage.i think thats the prblem.also you cant negate g vote if thats not from a pic.imo.but idont know.tell me if a wrong.like my cntest wth kenta laters.a new member said that mw ocg is wrong.n im sure he is not good at all.but i cant negate the vote if it is an opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

maad wrote peircing.not piercing damage.i think thats the prblem.also you cant negate g vote if thats not from a pic.imo.but idont know.tell me if a wrong.like my cntest wth kenta laters.a new member said that mw ocg is wrong.n im sure he is not good at all.but i cant negate the vote if it is an opinion.

 

i clearly wrote peiercing damage' date=' its like saying that he votes fopr ur card cause mines not a yugioh card....it is? so if he wants he can vote agan, but how can i be punished for someone who clearly has no idea?[hr']

can still vote for u but needs a proper reason..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have caused a bit of confusion about if peircing damage is a real yugioh term and even if I havent seen it on a real yugioh card alot of you have so I am going to do the right thing and admit I was wrong so my vote DOSE NOT count.

 

its kool, just make sure next time u ask before u make an assumption

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have caused a bit of confusion about if peircing damage is a real yugioh term and even if I havent seen it on a real yugioh card alot of you have so I am going to do the right thing and admit I was wrong so my vote DOSE NOT count.

 

"Piercing Damage" wording is rare because, you know, there are only 1 card use that term, "Cyberdark Horn."

 

A lot of YCM members sometime debated whether "Piercing Damage" is a correct term or not, up until now. As for me, "Piercing Damage" is valid and should be used because it's much shorter and the wording doesn't cluster the card's lore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have caused a bit of confusion about if peircing damage is a real yugioh term and even if I havent seen it on a real yugioh card alot of you have so I am going to do the right thing and admit I was wrong so my vote DOSE NOT count.

 

"Piercing Damage" wording is rare because' date=' you know, there are only 1 card use that term, "Cyberdark Horn."

 

A lot of YCM members sometime debated whether "Piercing Damage" is a correct term or not, up until now. As for me, "Piercing Damage" is valid and should be used because it's much shorter and the wording doesn't cluster the card's lore.

[/quote']

 

I dont own a Cyberdark Horn so thats why I thought peircing damage wasn't a real term but what does peircing damage mean anyway is it like direct damage or what?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Piercing Damage means this "When this card battles with a defense position monster whose DEF is lower than this card's ATK' date=' inflict the Damage to your opponent's Life Points".So it is basically a short term of that.Here is a card just to see what i mean:

 

http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Cyber_End_Dragon

[/quote']

 

Oh thanks for clearing that up :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...