Armored Scorpion

[~Demyx~]

Hi. Im new here and this is my first card...i know im not the best, but i still like it. Can you please rate my card?

 

[tommers2008]

Pic is fuzzy and poor, Graveyard is capitalized. I would also change the a before monster to a 1

 

Card is ok, not bad for a first card.

[DX DX USER]

Good for your first card. Most of the time, brand new member cards make no sense. All you missed was a capital "G" on Graveyard.

9.5/10

[Mazerrick]

Picture should be less blury.

 

Correct OCG:

Once per turn, you can discard 2 cards from your you hand to the Graveyard to destroy 1 monster on the field.

 

2 minor errors and a blurry pic not bad for your first card :).

 

7/10

[Clair]

Cool, a first card that isn't completely broken. I like you already. ^^

 

But one thing should be noted. Why would I waste 2 cards to destroy only 1 Monster card? There are real cards that get the job done more effectively. This card is pretty useless. >_>

 

I want to see a better effort from you.

[Hymn]

This card is pretty useless. >_>

 

Well, not necessarily. This card is a best in a Dark World deck ;)

[Clair]

This card is pretty useless. >_>

 

Well' date=' not necessarily. This card is a best in a Dark World deck ;)

[/quote']

 

It's a cost, I think.

 

DW effects don't activate when used for a cost. D:

[Inferno I20]

Cool' date=' a first card that isn't completely broken. I like you already. ^^

 

But one thing should be noted. Why would I waste 2 cards to destroy only 1 Monster card? There are real cards that get the job done more effectively. This card is pretty useless. >_>

 

I want to see a better effort from you.

[/quote']

hitting him where it hurts Clair...

hitting him where it hurts....

pretty ok card but like Clair said there are a ton of other options that are more cost effective like...Lightning Vortex

[Eury]

Pic is fuzzy and poor

 

Picture should be less blury.

 

I'm pretty sure no one gives a sheet about the quality of the pictures.

 

I was going to post this would be okay in Dark Worlds, but then the above posts reminded me that Dark World's effects don't activate when discarded via cost. And since it's EARTH, that completely throws Allure of Darkness out of the equation. So, ya, pretty useless card unless you run a shitty Infernity deck.

[Inferno I20]

Pic is fuzzy and poor

 

Picture should be less blury.

 

I'm pretty sure no one gives a s*** about the quality of the pictures.

i do! jk, if its very crappy then yes

[Eury]

Pic is fuzzy and poor

 

Picture should be less blury.

 

I'm pretty sure no one gives a s*** about the quality of the pictures.

i do! jk' date=' if its very crappy then yes

[/quote']

 

Pics don't make cards. The effects and stats do. Those should be your only focuses when rating a card. The picture should never effect anything. Ever.

[Inferno I20]

Pic is fuzzy and poor

 

Picture should be less blury.

 

I'm pretty sure no one gives a s*** about the quality of the pictures.

i do! jk' date=' if its very crappy then yes

[/quote']

 

Pics don't make cards. The effects and stats do. Those should be your only focuses when rating a card. The picture should never effect anything. Ever.

 

well duh it never effects my rating it would look a lot better though in my opinion but whatever, different people different opinions :D

[Hymn]

This card is pretty useless. >_>

 

Well' date=' not necessarily. This card is a best in a Dark World deck ;)

[/quote']

 

It's a cost, I think.

 

DW effects don't activate when used for a cost. D:

 

Yeah you might be right. I used to know this stuff, but now I've forgotten, lol :(

[tommers2008]

Pic is fuzzy and poor

 

Picture should be less blury.

 

I'm pretty sure no one gives a s*** about the quality of the pictures.

i do! jk' date=' if its very crappy then yes

[/quote']

 

Pics don't make cards. The effects and stats do. Those should be your only focuses when rating a card. The picture should never effect anything. Ever.

 

Go back to written cards, here in realistic pics, mean a fair bit to cards apperence

[-Griffin]

Pic is fuzzy and poor

 

Picture should be less blury.

 

I'm pretty sure no one gives a s*** about the quality of the pictures.

i do! jk' date=' if its very crappy then yes

[/quote']

 

Pics don't make cards. The effects and stats do. Those should be your only focuses when rating a card. The picture should never effect anything. Ever.

 

Go back to written cards, here in realistic pics, mean a fair bit to cards apperence

 

I don't think so. To me they're a nice little aesthetic tack-on.

 

The card is actually much better than what most experienced members post here. Solid Insects, or various other Insect builds such as Insect Monarchs could viably use this without it being broken. Personally, I'd like to see it as a Gemini or a WATER/LIGHT monster to really push those Decks forwards, but it's still a really usable card. Great job.

[Eury]

Pic is fuzzy and poor

 

Picture should be less blury.

 

I'm pretty sure no one gives a s*** about the quality of the pictures.

i do! jk' date=' if its very crappy then yes

[/quote']

 

Pics don't make cards. The effects and stats do. Those should be your only focuses when rating a card. The picture should never effect anything. Ever.

 

Go back to written cards, here in realistic pics, mean a fair bit to cards apperence

 

I've posted maybe 1 thread in Written Cards. And that was about 4 months ago. -_-

 

Sure, a nice pic is good, but if it's bad who cares? It's not like it makes the card itself bad. :/

[jacy]

not bad for your first card i give it 7/10

[tommers2008]

Pic is fuzzy and poor

 

Picture should be less blury.

 

I'm pretty sure no one gives a s*** about the quality of the pictures.

i do! jk' date=' if its very crappy then yes

[/quote']

 

Pics don't make cards. The effects and stats do. Those should be your only focuses when rating a card. The picture should never effect anything. Ever.

 

Go back to written cards, here in realistic pics, mean a fair bit to cards apperence

 

I've posted maybe 1 thread in Written Cards. And that was about 4 months ago. -_-

 

Sure, a nice pic is good, but if it's bad who cares? It's not like it makes the card itself bad. :/

 

I didn't intend that as you are always there, i should have just said go to written, Yes i agree pic has no bearing into what a card can do, but if this card had an awesome pic at least 5 others would have posted here saying wow great pic good card e.t.c im just saying what a good amount of people here judge on. When i judge a card in realistic its pic is just worth about 5% - 10% in some cases of total score so i don't really lay much at all to pic but as you have said its nice to have a good pic, but if you post here in realistic why not try put in the effort to get a decent enough picture, that isn't fuzzy and such.