Jump to content

Honor of the Dragoness


Saiba Aisu

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 68
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I'll cut straight to the chase.

 

Vanessa:

-Picture: 7/10 (meh, not my type)

-Effect: 8/10 (not bad, but nothing brutally revolutionary either)

-Balance: 8/10 (generally ok... she can get pretty dangerous later... maybe decrease her base stats a bit? To like, 1500-1500 or something)

-Originality: 9/10 (not bad at all)

-OCG: 9.5/10 (Replace 'can' with 'may', and change 'Then shuffle your Deck' to 'Shuffle your Deck afterwards'. I'm not sure if your style is wrong though)

 

Aurore:

-Picture: 9/10 (nii~ce =/)

-Effect: 8/10 (again, nothing of great interest)

-Balance: 9/10 (balanced, that says all)

-Originality: 8.5/10 (good)

-OCG: 7/10 (the effect is worded wrongly. It sounds like she can attack twice in a row after the first attack, which I assume is wrong. Anyway, even if you wanted to say that, it's still wrongly worded)

 

May:

-Picture: 8.5/10 (not very bad, not particularly great either)

-Effect: 8.5/10 (decent)

-Balance: 7.5/10 (eh, until your next Main Phase? Until the End Phase is enough...)

-Originality: 8.5/10 (nothing much to be said, especially since she belongs to a whole Set. Dragons aren't particularly original, but you chose an interesting theme)

-OCG: 10/10 (flawless, I think)

 

Olivia:

-Picture: 7.5/10 (wtf, isn't she cold... anyway, not bad I guess)

-Effect: 9/10 (better than the previous ones)

-Balance: 9/10 (it's balanced, generally)

-Originality: 9/10 (a rather original idea)

-OCG: 8/10 (you screwed up the last sentence - it's supposed to be "...cannot attack until the End Phase of the second turn after activation")

 

Cyline:

-Picture: 9/10 (not bad)

-Effect: 8.5/10 (nothing revolutionary, nothing bad)

-Balance: 8/10 (a bit underpowered, could use a buff in attack and / or defense)

-Originality: 8/10 (it's fine.)

-OCG: 9.5/10 (made a ' into a ; - yes, I can be a prick. Other than that, excellent)

 

Erika:

-Picture: 7.5/10 (eh, don't really like the effect... it would be better without it)

-Effect: 9/10 (it has a good and usable effect)

-Balance: 9/10 (balanced, could be a tad bit overpowered under circumstances)

-Originality: 9/10 (pretty original)

-OCG: 8/10 (eh, I have a feeling you messed up the first part of the effect... and I think the second one's got too many 'destroy's, lol. Anyway, not really bad, but still)

 

Annalise:

-Picture: 6/10 (it's the only picture in your set that I bluntly... don't like)

-Effect: 7/10 (eh, couldn't you have picked something better than another piercing effect... or at least, something on top of that?)

-Balance: 8/10 (1800 + piercing is perhaps too much, since 1900 + piercing results in switching to def mode with 0 defense... make it 1700 or something)

-Originality: 7/10 (eh, I couldn't find anything particularly original about that card... from the name to the effect, it's too... conventional)

-OCG: 10/10 (it's fine, it's just a piercing effect anyway)

 

Dragoness Summoning:

-Picture: 9/10 (there's a good picture)

-Effect: 8.5/10 (not bad, it could include your hand as an option to summon from - most of these cards do)

-Balance: 9.5/10 (it's pretty much balanced, maybe a tad bit underpowered? Not sure)

-Originality: 8/10 (eh, it's fine I guess. Nothing too original, but still)

-OCG: 9/10 (no need to say 'original' before ATK, if you summon something from your deck, how can it's current ATK not be its original?)

 

Dragon's Full Salvo:

-Picture: 9.5 (great)

-Effect: 9.5 (liked it)

-Balance: 9.5 (it's balanced, I believe)

-Originality: 9.5 (especially liked the name - unless 'Salvo' is some horribly misspelled word >_>)

-OCG: 8/10 (eh, you kinda messed it up a bit, but it's the last card and I'm too tired to figure out what...)

 

^ Ixigo's professional grading. All your card games are belong to us.

 

I'm too tired and bored to make averages, do them yourself if you're interested.

 

Anyway, I judged them pretty justly, I think - I liked the Set idea, but I generally hate Dragons as an idea overall (god they are so abused), so I may have been a little bit biased. Good job anyway, this was a great set.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

o.o Wow. All innocence has been stripped from my eyes. Thank you for that. And yes, you are getting a rep for spotting the ";" . I got a guilty feeling every time I looked and no one noticed. Yes, I know Dragons are abused but at least the pictures are original. Thank you for rating and taking such time to explain just why you rated that way. Great job.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

These are great! Only one thing: on May, the Dragoness Tamer and Dragon's Spike Agression you mention "until your next Main Phase". Do you mean that if you activate the effect during your Main Phase 1, the effect lasts until your Main Phase 2, and if it is activated during Main Phase 2 it lasts throughout your opponent's turn until your next Main Phase 1? If not, perhaps "until your next Standby Phase" would be more appropriate.

As i said, these are excellent, so 10/10 (first one i've ever given if i'm not mistaken)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, basically I'm posting here to figure out whether or not you are getting my PMs... but it'd be spam, I might as well point out that by "next Main Phase" you automatically refer to "next Main Phase 1", unless you specify the "2".

 

At least, I'm 96% certain of that...

 

Anyway, will we see more Dragoness cards?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...