Pikachu Posted June 21, 2010 Report Share Posted June 21, 2010 Ah, DMG. How unexpected. The sub-type 'Human' is possibly the WORST fake type ever though of. The most practical and common reason is because all the noobs use it too often. You make an anime character with a human type and you gtfo. But that's not the main point. The name of the game is Yugioh: Duel MONSTERS. In a world where magical and elemental monsters battle, humans serve no purpose other than using them to duel each other. Having them on a battlefield is a dumb option. Are you going to equip him with a machine gun? Yes, very monster-like. I would also like to admit the type 'Inventor' is creative, but hell, he's still a human. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brushfire Posted June 21, 2010 Report Share Posted June 21, 2010 Uh, then... please classify how Spellcasters and Machines are monsters. =/ Equipping a human with a machine gun would make him Warrior btw. ;D Anyway, I expected better, because there's no way a "Warrior" could be a monster either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pikachu Posted June 21, 2010 Report Share Posted June 21, 2010 Uh' date=' then... please classify how Spellcasters and Machines are monsters. =/ Equipping a human with a machine gun would make him Warrior btw. ;D Anyway, I expected better, because there's no way a "Warrior" could be a monster either.[/quote'] Spellcaster: Mage. Most of these are elfs for some reason.Machine: MADE by humans, not human. And god are they god-damn strong. And although a gun does make them a warrior, they're not the best type of thing to go on a battlefield. When you see a warrior monster (see? All cards are referred to monsters) you usually think of barbarian warriors, not gunners. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Womi Posted June 21, 2010 Report Share Posted June 21, 2010 Well, you can make your Fake Type becoming a decent "real" type, by just building a decent backup around the FT. In this way, assuming your FT isn't something dumb like "Killah" or "God" or "Grandpa" but something like "Cosmic" or whatever, the whole idea around your new, personal type is getting cool and stuff. Annoyingly written rant short:Make cards supporting your FT, not only 5 monsters with "Human" or "Bottlehead" type. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nexev Posted June 21, 2010 Report Share Posted June 21, 2010 Going by the Yu Gi Oh guide line of real types tends to show more creativity' date=' due to having to work with the smaller amount of types being offered. That said, it should not matter so long as you keep them out of all realistic card threads.[/quote'] Your logic is so beautiful. I am not being sarcastic. You have shown so much more logic in your one comment than I have seen in total on this site. Hey, I'm smarticle too. What I think is this: People often used fake types when making a bad card, people also use real types when making bad cards but not many people notice this for some reason or another. Because of this people accosiate bad cards with fake types and once someone sees a fake type they decide it's a bad card and see it fit to insult it as such. I've seen so many uncreative real types it's sad. Sea serpent anyone? Ah' date=' DMG. How unexpected. The sub-type 'Human' is possibly the WORST fake type ever though of. The most practical and common reason is because all the noobs use it too often. You make an anime character with a human type and you gtfo. But that's not the main point. The name of the game is Yugioh: Duel MONSTERS. In a world where magical and elemental monsters battle, humans serve no purpose other than using them to duel each other. Having them on a battlefield is a dumb option. Are you going to equip him with a machine gun? Yes, very monster-like. I would also like to admit the type 'Inventor' is creative, but hell,[b'] he's still a human.[/b] So is most of the warriors if your going to argue that. Say hi to Gilford the Legend, Gearfried, Dai Grepher, and others. Also Dark MAgician girl and others spellcastors are human but with magical powers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lightning Bagon Posted June 21, 2010 Report Share Posted June 21, 2010 No rant from me, but a while ago I made a card that type was "Winged-Knight" I regret not making it "Winged-Warrior" but whatever. a winged-warrior type would be interesting because there is beast-warrior and winged beast type but not a winged warrior type? A winged warrior is a warrior with wings a more descriptive version of warrior. Did it turn out to rant? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest JoshIcy Posted June 21, 2010 Report Share Posted June 21, 2010 No rant from me' date=' but a while ago I made a card that type was "Winged-Knight" I regret not making it "Winged-Warrior" but whatever. a winged-warrior type would be interesting because there is beast-warrior and winged beast type but not a winged warrior type? A winged warrior is a warrior with wings a more descriptive version of warrior. Did it turn out to rant?[/quote'] Fairy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jonny Posted June 21, 2010 Report Share Posted June 21, 2010 Fake types are seen bad casue they are..............fake? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lightning Bagon Posted June 21, 2010 Report Share Posted June 21, 2010 Fake types are seen bad casue they are..............fake?The cards we make are fake Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jbizzle2pt0 Posted June 21, 2010 Author Report Share Posted June 21, 2010 Fake types are seen bad casue they are..............fake?The cards we make are fake I agree Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pikachu Posted June 21, 2010 Report Share Posted June 21, 2010 Fake types are seen bad casue they are..............fake?The cards we make are fake Funny we post them in a 'Realistic' section huh? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lightning Bagon Posted June 21, 2010 Report Share Posted June 21, 2010 True, but still there fake F-A-K-E fake. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spirit of DMG Posted June 22, 2010 Report Share Posted June 22, 2010 Fake types are seen bad casue they are..............fake? And you people say the Fake type supporters are noobs. This is the kind of argument I absolutely hate. We know they're fake. Hence the name "Fake Types. Now, Pikachu, where did I mention Human-Type or Human Sub-Type? The type is "Loli" and if you must see it, then I would recommend finding the thread containing them. Someone mentioned building a set for it. Well, I made an entire deck for Loli-Type. Go ahead, I trust you know how to find my threads. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jbizzle2pt0 Posted June 22, 2010 Author Report Share Posted June 22, 2010 When it comes to fake types I believe the worst argument is that the card is not OCG. Neither is any other card on this site. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mehmani Posted June 22, 2010 Report Share Posted June 22, 2010 Let me explain. Realistic Cards is a section for realistic and balanced cards. Fake Types aren't realistic, so they are not allowed in the Realistic Cards section. Fake Types are fine in AoC (Any Other Cards) and Pop Culture Cards. Though, as Josh said, Fake Types can be realistic if they are given extensive and balanced support. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest JoshIcy Posted June 22, 2010 Report Share Posted June 22, 2010 Let me explain. Realistic Cards is a section for realistic and balanced cards. Fake Types aren't realistic' date=' so they are not allowed in the Realistic Cards section. Fake Types are fine in AoC (Any Other Cards) and Pop Culture Cards. Though, as Josh said, Fake Types can be realistic if they are given extensive and balanced support.[/quote'] Don't circumvent a rule that does not exist. Fake-Types are allowed and perfectly legitimate. However, depending on the scope of it it may or may not be moved to AoC. Rule #24 on YCM- God how I love Frunk's back-up rules. Never change them ^^. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brushfire Posted June 22, 2010 Report Share Posted June 22, 2010 Rule #24 on YCM- God how I love Frunk's back-up rules. Never change them ^^. I don't. It's that rule that allowed Bloodrun to warn and ban me extensively for arguing with him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Tin Trooper Posted June 22, 2010 Report Share Posted June 22, 2010 Rule #24 on YCM- God how I love Frunk's back-up rules. Never change them ^^. I don't. It's that rule that allowed Bloodrun to warn and ban me extensively for arguing with him. Bloodrun D:<He was an awful Mod. He had that little-kid syndrome. The one hwere he rages if he doesn't get his own way. How did he get banned again? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shrekstasy Posted June 22, 2010 Report Share Posted June 22, 2010 Apparently putting Knight instead of Warrior pisses people off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jonny Posted June 22, 2010 Report Share Posted June 22, 2010 Apparently putting Knight instead of Warrior pisses people off. Why do they need to change it into Knight , isn't warrior god enough? :o Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shrekstasy Posted June 22, 2010 Report Share Posted June 22, 2010 Apparently putting Knight instead of Warrior pisses people off. Why do they need to change it into Knight ' date=' isn't warrior god enough? :o[/quote'] That's why people hate them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest JoshIcy Posted June 22, 2010 Report Share Posted June 22, 2010 Rule #24 on YCM- God how I love Frunk's back-up rules. Never change them ^^. I don't. It's that rule that allowed Bloodrun to warn and ban me extensively for arguing with him. Obvious misuse was obvious? The rule is still great. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spirit of DMG Posted June 23, 2010 Report Share Posted June 23, 2010 Let me explain. Realistic Cards is a section for realistic and balanced cards. Fake Types aren't realistic' date=' so they are not allowed in the Realistic Cards section. Fake Types are fine in AoC (Any Other Cards) and Pop Culture Cards. Though, as Josh said, Fake Types can be realistic if they are given extensive and balanced support.[/quote'] Ally, you were right there when Icy said that there is no official rule keeping Fake Types out of the Realistic Section. hmmm...Frunk may be up for a move up my personal like list for mods. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jeremylim167 Posted July 10, 2010 Report Share Posted July 10, 2010 Like people said about fake types, it isn't creative and all, like if you make a type like _______ about a video game or something because you're making a set about the games and stuff, it will unique to that and even if the makers make that type, it'll only be useful to that. Still I actually suggest the makers make the type, Ice, it'll actually be useful. And usually, I've seen lots of hot threads and they're filled with real types. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DARKPLANT RISING Posted July 10, 2010 Report Share Posted July 10, 2010 Because they are stupid [/topic] Here is the one who has no addition to the discussion. Some LV 6 members are like that. OT: I'm finally going to post things that make sense. Because: most monsters fit into at least one of the many types. For instance' date=' look at random pics from the well-known Jazin Kay Albums. Some look like a type doesn't exist for them, such as:[img']http://i825.photobucket.com/albums/zz178/JazinKay/ETC/th_bjkhgiubjkvhfuil.jpg[/img]However, it can be:Psychic (mystical feeling)Spellcaster (if it's sort of like Royal Magical Library)Fairy (it's in the sky) And only a small number of pics need fake types. An "Ogre-Type Set" can be summed into "Fiend-Type". An "Sword-Type Set" can be summed into "Warrior-Type". Fake Sub-Types are welcomed. Go use those instead! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.