mythcaptor Posted June 24, 2010 Report Share Posted June 24, 2010 Runescape warrior in dragon armorCnC . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azphreal Posted June 24, 2010 Report Share Posted June 24, 2010 Nice flow, but my eye naturally follows the orange and misses the focal :PPretty good lighting, and nice color scheme.Overall, I think it's a pretty cool tag. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mythcaptor Posted June 24, 2010 Author Report Share Posted June 24, 2010 Thanks :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Legend Zero Posted June 24, 2010 Report Share Posted June 24, 2010 Terrible use of the sparkes brush. WTF happened to lower right corner? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mythcaptor Posted June 24, 2010 Author Report Share Posted June 24, 2010 The idea of this tag was that fire/brightness in front of him was caused by his sword's slash, and so behind him was unaffected. Im not sure if I got that idea across, but that was my intent. I dont see what's wrong with my sparkles. I thought they were pretty well blended. LZ, you are so negative with your critique. Keep in mind that Ive gone from this to this In two days try to tell people what they did right instead of only what they did wrong Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vapor™ Posted June 24, 2010 Report Share Posted June 24, 2010 u need more effects. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hioco Posted June 24, 2010 Report Share Posted June 24, 2010 This tag is good for a person to go from what you have done in only two days... The flow is great as it all goes the way the render does =] The colors are... Okay. They could use a variety of colors instead of the colors of the exact render. It's not bad though, just try to range on colors and effects.. The render is a great choice as it has action, the renders not still and dull, which is a great thing. I hope you read this and take a few points down and use them :D Good work mate :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brendano Harns Posted June 24, 2010 Report Share Posted June 24, 2010 The idea of this tag was that fire/brightness in front of him was caused by his sword's slash' date=' and so behind him was unaffected. Im not sure if I got that idea across, but that was my intent. I dont see what's wrong with my sparkles. I thought they were pretty well blended. LZ, you are so negative with your critique. Keep in mind that Ive gone from this [img']http://i300.photobucket.com/albums/nn6/mythcaptor/darkorg.png[/img] to this In two days try to tell people what they did right instead of only what they did wrong How would you learn, then? You would not. That effect you were going for. The way you went about doing it makes it look way too choppy. You need a better transition. The effects to the left steal the attention away from the focal. Better, though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Legend Zero Posted June 24, 2010 Report Share Posted June 24, 2010 LZ' date=' you are so negative with your critique. try to tell people what they did right instead of only what they did wrong[/quote']What if you did nothing right? Praising one for something they do right will never allow them to better themselves by seeing flaw in their work. If you cannot accept CnC then don't worry about it. From now on I'll leave your threads alone for you, so you can get the "Oh I like it you iz supah cool!!!" comments that you are searching for. PS: This is why the vetern YCM GFX'ers hate n00bs. LZ done posting in mythcaptor threads. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mythcaptor Posted June 24, 2010 Author Report Share Posted June 24, 2010 To LZI think you misinterpret me. I recognize that I am still a noob, and I really really really value your CnC, as a pros advise is the best way to learn. But is their really NOTHING I did right in this tag? Is too much to ask for You did x,y,and z wrongyou can do x to make y look betteroh and nice job on x Its your choice if you want to post on my threads, but just know that I value ALL your feedback, and Im sorry If I offended you.Its just that you should keep you CnC more positive. That doesnt mean dont tell me what I did wrong. That would be stupid, but saying x was terrible and WTF happened to y is really hard on the self esteem of people new to taggers and is less useful that a more positive CnC P.S. I CAN accept CnC. I was just asking for what I did right as well as what I did wrong To FuzzieIf I lowered the saturation of the effect on the left, would that make it steal less of the attention from the focal? To CryingRockThanks a lot for you CnC. It was clear, precise, and told me both what I did right and wrong. You are a perfect example of how CnC should be given. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RickiMinaj Posted June 24, 2010 Report Share Posted June 24, 2010 Terrible use of the sparkes brush. WTF happened to lower right corner? My question exactly as well. It feels like an overture of the burn effect with red tints and shades. The idea of this tag was that fire/brightness in front of him was caused by his sword's slash' date=' and so behind him was unaffected. Im not sure if I got that idea across, but that was my intent. I dont see what's wrong with my sparkles. I thought they were pretty well blended.[/quote'] The Idea you were trying to portray is good, but your execution therefor lacks and needs improvement. You have got a good base, just work off of it. The flow is decent, but crowds are never amused with the back of heads, unless it really stands out. This one, unfortunately, does not. Also, the C4D you used, seems to be giving off a pixely look, which is never a good thing. ~Good luck in the future. u need more effects. No, actually, he just needs to reposition his current ones. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GHawk Posted June 24, 2010 Report Share Posted June 24, 2010 Yo biatch, you don't people how to CnC. Plus, there is ABSOULTLY NOTHING you right right/good in this thing you call a tag. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mythcaptor Posted June 24, 2010 Author Report Share Posted June 24, 2010 yeeah. In the lower right, I kinda used a color burn when I probs shouldn't have. Anyways Thanks EssenceYo biatch, you did nothing productive in that post, therefor it is spam Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Madsen Posted June 25, 2010 Report Share Posted June 25, 2010 yeeah. In the lower right' date=' I kinda used a color burn when I probs shouldn't have. Anyways Thanks Essence[hr']Yo biatch, you did nothing productive in that post, therefor it is spam No, he said that there was nothing good in this tag. Which is 90% correct. The smudging in the BG is decent. However, compare this to *quickly finds something on PR*this, credit to Divi.Do you see how much Divi's tag is better? Like, the light comes for those orange dots. That's how the lightning was created.Now look carefully at his tag. You can, by looking at it, see that the render (stock in this case) is away from the BG. That's depth. And you have that. But it shucks.Now, some of your C4D's interfere with the flow. Flow is the one direction that the tag goes in, so, the render and C4D's point up, but the main flow is to the upper right corner. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mythcaptor Posted June 25, 2010 Author Report Share Posted June 25, 2010 Ok thanks. you're right that his is way better, as I've said before, Im still a noob. I've been really trying for depth, buts it takes a lot of time and practice to get it right. Same with good lighting. I think, slowly but surely, I am getting better though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Madsen Posted June 25, 2010 Report Share Posted June 25, 2010 VERY slowly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mythcaptor Posted June 25, 2010 Author Report Share Posted June 25, 2010 >:( not very niceTHISwas me less than a week ago Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Madsen Posted June 26, 2010 Report Share Posted June 26, 2010 That's not much of a change broseph. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.