chedbonlahor Posted July 3, 2010 Report Share Posted July 3, 2010 I have wanted to make this card for some time now and finally I have I hope you all like it I know I do: "Dark Magician" "Obnoxious Celtic Guardian"This card is not destroyed as a result of battle when this card battles with a monster with an ATK of 3000 of more. (Damage calculation is applied normally.) You can decrease the ATK of this card by 1300 to select one Spell Card in your Graveyard and activate it. You can decrease the ATK of this card by 2600 to select one Spell Card in your opponent's Graveyard and activate it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flynado Posted July 3, 2010 Report Share Posted July 3, 2010 great:) very original design!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drake Delison Posted July 3, 2010 Report Share Posted July 3, 2010 The First one is excellent, but you need to put it regains it Atk Sometime. Change that and I'll give a perfect 10.8/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coaster Guy Posted July 3, 2010 Report Share Posted July 3, 2010 strange, I have a celtic guardian and summoned skull fusion. It is nice card, 8.5/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chedbonlahor Posted July 3, 2010 Author Report Share Posted July 3, 2010 Thanks For the comments. To drake, the reason I didnt give it any ATK regaining ablilities is for two reasons: 1. Because the card would be overpowered, the ability to reuse magic cards from the graveyard (and your opponent's for that matter) is a luxury not to be taken for granted.2. Because the effect i gave it is a reflection of me as a card maker, for you to say "Change that and I'll give a perfect 10." is simply a clash of our oppinions. I will not change it but again thanks for the imput I hope you understand Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phanax Leminer Posted July 3, 2010 Report Share Posted July 3, 2010 Aiku: It's a good idea, but under developed. OCG: one = 1You don't need to see the damage calculation will be apply, its not common of seeing undestructavble monster now a days.Effect: The effect is well thought, but only problem. The monster is useless after first activation of its effect. Name and Image: No, change the image. I hate it. Overall: 5.7/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chedbonlahor Posted July 3, 2010 Author Report Share Posted July 3, 2010 Aiku: It's a good idea' date=' but under developed.[/color'] OCG: one = 1You don't need to see the damage calculation will be apply, its not common of seeing undestructavble monster now a days.Effect: The effect is well thought, but only problem. The monster is useless after first activation of its effect. Name and Image: No, change the image. I hate it. Overall: 5.7/10 That is well thought and fair criticism but allow me to defend myself. - If you lok at obnoxious.C.G it states (just like this card) "damage calculation does not apply"- I see this monster as a definsive holding monster, what i like about it is the choice which forces you to choose between you and your opponent's graveyard and attack and no attack, there are many choices in play at one time. Also there are many cards to increase this cards attack, but remember attack isnt everything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XIII THE BRUTE Posted July 3, 2010 Report Share Posted July 3, 2010 2 of my favourite cards together, I loove it. It has actually got the the point now where I scan the feed to find your submissions haha, I looove your work. 9/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smesh Posted July 3, 2010 Report Share Posted July 3, 2010 i did a card just like this with the same image XD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chedbonlahor Posted July 3, 2010 Author Report Share Posted July 3, 2010 Why dont you post it??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Smeagle Posted July 3, 2010 Report Share Posted July 3, 2010 I love this card. Really. It's got a lot of potential in the right sort of deck, but it's not splashable in just anything. I would, however, make just one recommendation; cannot be summoned except by Fusion Summon! Otherwise, Instant Fusion gets this for 1000 LP and laughs in your opponent's face. You could run this in a deck with loads of Equip Spells. Megamorph this for 4 spells in your Grave or 2 spells in your opponent's? Oh yey. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chedbonlahor Posted July 3, 2010 Author Report Share Posted July 3, 2010 Thanks for the feedback "Lord Smeagle" I may do that. What does splashable mean??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andy dark palidan Posted July 3, 2010 Report Share Posted July 3, 2010 thats cool you should make dark magician and alpha the magna warrior Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Smeagle Posted July 3, 2010 Report Share Posted July 3, 2010 "Splashable" means that a card can simply be inserted into any deck and it will be good. For example, staple cards like Pot of Greed and Heavy Storm are splashable because they work in every deck. The same goes for Synchro Monsters like Brionac and Stardust. They're not deck-specific, they're just straight up GOOD for any deck. This card is unsplashable because it requires that you be running at least OCG (lol, OCG) or Dark Magician in the deck, which are two uncommon cards, and a Fusion Sub like Versago the Destroyer. But Dark Magician Decks do still exist and a card like this may just give them the sort of power they need to be competitive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chedbonlahor Posted July 3, 2010 Author Report Share Posted July 3, 2010 Thanks. But just for clarity, I actually didnt make this card to become deck-worthy, it was just because I wanted to make it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Smeagle Posted July 3, 2010 Report Share Posted July 3, 2010 Thanks. But just for clarity' date=' I actually didnt make this card to become deck-worthy, it was just because I wanted to make it[/quote'] Well, at any rate, I rate all cards in Realistic as if they would actually be played in a duel. And I can tell you, good sir, that I would run this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chedbonlahor Posted July 3, 2010 Author Report Share Posted July 3, 2010 Thanks very much, you are a legend haha Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Smeagle Posted July 3, 2010 Report Share Posted July 3, 2010 Thanks very much' date=' you are a legend haha[/quote'] Oh I wish. I've not yet joined those ranks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.