justynandtony Posted July 11, 2010 Report Share Posted July 11, 2010 Tell me what you think. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jakkk1k93 Posted July 11, 2010 Report Share Posted July 11, 2010 quite good, well balanced, maybe a little overpowered depending on tha way you look at it seeming it has no effect. :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manpole Posted July 12, 2010 Report Share Posted July 12, 2010 Reading the name.. did you mean to put Volcanic* or was Volcantic on purpose?also, monsters with 1900 or more def that require no tributes usually have low attack, this one has fair ATK, and great DEF. I think its just an okay card, because posting a Vanilla card with no support cards makes it sort of pointless. 4.5/10 until it gets support or an effect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Athena- Posted July 12, 2010 Report Share Posted July 12, 2010 Love the name (maybe Volcanic Dragon is better) and picture. I really find descriptions on the card boring so add and effect. Anyways, I'll give a 6.8/10. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
justynandtony Posted July 12, 2010 Author Report Share Posted July 12, 2010 ok i made some changes. tell me what you think now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rightnow' Posted July 12, 2010 Report Share Posted July 12, 2010 i'm not sure, but maybe change the effect to this:"Once per turn, when a monster your opponent controls with less DEF than this card, you can negate the attack." <- i fail at yugioh, but i think that mine is more correct than yours. Well, i like yourcard=7. 7.5/10. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Two-Hundred And One Posted July 12, 2010 Report Share Posted July 12, 2010 It's good, but I think the effect should be:"Whenever an opponent's monster with less DEF than this card attacks this card, you may negate the attack. Then, this card loses 200 DEF.Higher DEF and lower ATK would be good, too. Maybe 400/2400? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rightnow' Posted July 12, 2010 Report Share Posted July 12, 2010 i think it'd be overpowered so much def for a lv 4, since with its effect, it'd be very hard to kill x; Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Two-Hundred And One Posted July 12, 2010 Report Share Posted July 12, 2010 Well... it would lose 200 DEF each time it used it's effect. I guess you're right, though. Ignore my comments! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.