GageQ1 Posted July 12, 2010 Report Share Posted July 12, 2010 RATE!!! .......... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smesh Posted July 12, 2010 Report Share Posted July 12, 2010 guess its ok. i really dnt know how to rate vanillas but i guess everything here is in order so 9.9/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
senatheEND Posted July 12, 2010 Report Share Posted July 12, 2010 TERRIBLE! 6/10 xD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GageQ1 Posted July 12, 2010 Author Report Share Posted July 12, 2010 All you rate vanilla cards by is, Name/Story/Picture. Thnz for the rating Also, I meant for it to get terrible ratings LOL. That's why I lost in a contest with this piece of sh** just wanted to share it with all of YCM. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dharoko Posted July 12, 2010 Report Share Posted July 12, 2010 I like it :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eternal Duelist Posted July 12, 2010 Report Share Posted July 12, 2010 You Broke the Vanilla rule of Vanillaness! No Vanilla will be as strong or stronger than Blue-Eyes!1/10 for breaking the rule(everything else is in order however) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manpole Posted July 12, 2010 Report Share Posted July 12, 2010 Why put "These two twins" if they are twins.. then we know there are 2 of them. Also how can they be twins if they are from different tribes, and because they are from different tribes and there are only 2 of them, you don't need the "two" in front of "different tribes". Pic is okay, name is okay, ATK/DEF are good for level... but there is no ID or Serial. I don't like Vanilla cards unless they have support of some kind, so unless you add support or give it an effect 5.9/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cowboy Dan Posted July 12, 2010 Report Share Posted July 12, 2010 Pic: 9/10Name: 9/10Story: 0/10 xD JK 9/10Total: 1/10 xD JK aGaIn 9/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~Duo~ Posted July 12, 2010 Report Share Posted July 12, 2010 If you give it an effect, then it's not a Vanilla anymore, ruining the purpose, Manpole. Pic: 9/10Name: 9/10Story: 0/10 xD JK 9/10Total: 1/10 xD JK aGaIn 9/10 And it's not exactly stronger than Blue-Eyes. This has a bit more DEF but has no support so I guess it kinda evens out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manpole Posted July 12, 2010 Report Share Posted July 12, 2010 If you give it an effect' date=' then it's not a Vanilla anymore, ruining the purpose, Manpole.[/quote'] I know... and as I said, I don't like Vanilla cards, so give it support, or an effect. (thus changing it) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GageQ1 Posted July 12, 2010 Author Report Share Posted July 12, 2010 I never put the Serial Number or ID Number on it unless I want to print it so, there is no reason to write that in your posts, and THNX for the ratings... Also, I don't thin kit matters if it is stronger than BEWD, they call it YCMaker for a reason. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manpole Posted July 12, 2010 Report Share Posted July 12, 2010 I know serial and Id are not important, I just noticed that it seemed incomplete so if you wanted to add those. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zeaux Posted July 12, 2010 Report Share Posted July 12, 2010 And it's not exactly stronger than Blue-Eyes. This has a bit more DEF but has no support so I guess it kinda evens out. No, it still more stronger than BWD. Even if its only the DEF. So no, this card is not good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eternal Duelist Posted July 12, 2010 Report Share Posted July 12, 2010 Well It is the realistic section of the site and there aren't any Vanillas stronger than blue-eyes ._.thats why i think its not "realistic" (but if they do make any vanillas that break that rule, then that will be a very sad day D: Yay Zeaux agrees with me :3 ~ <3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jakkk1k93 Posted July 12, 2010 Report Share Posted July 12, 2010 yea, it shouldn't be as high as blue eyes (i have 9 and i love 'em) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chedbonlahor Posted July 12, 2010 Report Share Posted July 12, 2010 I consider myself a somewhat vanilla expert and you shall be judged on your word play, card believablilty and stroyline. Your way with words needs work however it is not badThe believability is there I can see it workingThe storyline is imaginite but I would leave more to the readers imagination. This is what I would write as the Lore "From distant lands, two equal and opposite forces bound by a fated counterpoint shall merge to defend the world from destruction." You may use that if you want its just a suggestion!!! overall 7.25/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GageQ1 Posted July 13, 2010 Author Report Share Posted July 13, 2010 Thanks, chedbonlahor for the tip i'll change it to your Lore it's great!FIXED Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eternal Duelist Posted July 13, 2010 Report Share Posted July 13, 2010 Now thats one sexy looking card ;) 10/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jakkk1k93 Posted July 13, 2010 Report Share Posted July 13, 2010 It is very sexy ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chedbonlahor Posted July 13, 2010 Report Share Posted July 13, 2010 Im Glad you liked my Lore, I will be glad to do more if you need :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
·Toot Posted July 13, 2010 Report Share Posted July 13, 2010 eh.. this is kewl 8.5/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zextra Posted July 13, 2010 Report Share Posted July 13, 2010 I like it. Try adding a more creative story/lore, but still, really nice! 9.5/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.