Manpole Posted July 16, 2010 Report Share Posted July 16, 2010 This is my newest card, and I plan on finding a place for it in my new "Elf" set I'm creating. What do you think of it? Any criticism, input, ratings, reviews, and whatever... are all welcome. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NeXodus Posted July 16, 2010 Report Share Posted July 16, 2010 Such simplistic OCG mistakes that could be easily fixed if you looked at an OCG Fix Thread, butI suppose I can help. MAY = CANYOUR SIDE OF THE FIELD/YOUR OPPONENTS SIDE OF THE FIELD = YOU CONTROL/YOUR OPPONENT CONTROLS Otherwise this card is pointless and has no use whatsoever. Unless you liketo be a mega-b**ch and copy someones every move, I think Copycat is a better choice.Sure it doesn't copy the Att. and Name, Type and Effect, but ultimately you can attack when ever you want and Copycat counts as a tribute. It's...It's not that good. Though slightly original, it has no use unless of the above said. I'd give it a 4/10, but it does have a sorta good image, it's a tripped out Red-Eyes image.5/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manpole Posted July 16, 2010 Author Report Share Posted July 16, 2010 Well I didn't want it to be OP so I gave it some drawbacks, which I guess you think are too much...Also it can be useful, say you copy a Red-Eyes (like in the pic) because you have no monsters on the field, it saves you from being hit directly, also if Red-Eyes kills a monster you control, your Reflection of Red-Eyes can attack, and since both Red-Eyes have the same ATK you could attack their Red-Eyes and have them both killed. Also it can be tributed for use of a Spell card, Trap card, or card effect, just not for a Summon. And yah, Copycat may end up being a little better, but only in certain situations - Because he does not gain the enemies effects. Thanks for the input though, I've made a few slight changes to the card. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NeXodus Posted July 16, 2010 Report Share Posted July 16, 2010 Well, as your implying, Copycat is a better card, Red-Eyes doesn't have an effect. lol 'Red Eyes kills a monster you control, your reflection of red-eyes can attack, and since both red-eyes have the same ATK, you could attack with their red-eyes and have them both killed' Same goes with copy cat, you can do that too. 'cept you can't immediatly attack after, but both will be destroyed if either of them attack because both of them have the same ATK, either way. The only good way of this card that slipped out of my mind is the fact that it's a trap so 'because you have no monsters on the field, it saves you from being hit directly'. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manpole Posted July 16, 2010 Author Report Share Posted July 16, 2010 Well yah... Red Eyes has no effect, but I was just pointing out that this card could give you a useful effect, also it can be used on your opponents turn. Also doesn't Copycat only takes the enemies original ATK and DEF? Not whatever ATK and DEF they are at, which is including equip/field cards. (Just trying to show how this card isn't completely horrible, and give it a free bump at the same time) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.