Spellcaster chick with a unique effect. (Input and/or opinions appreciated)

[Dandelo]

If you're confused about the last effect, i'll explain it in these terms:

 

Say my "Breaker the Magical Warrior" removes his 1 Spell Counter to activate his effect, this chick's effect then activates. If your opponent cannot reveal a Spell Card, inflict 500 damage, since only 1 Spell Counter was removed from Breaker to activate his effect.

 

Got it? Good. Have at it.

 

 

When this card is Summoned, you can pay Life Points in multiples of 500 (max. 1500). Select 1 Spell Card in your Deck or Graveyard that includes "Spellcaster-Type" in its card text for each 500 Life Points paid, and Set them on your side of the field. If Spellcaster-Type monsters are the only Type of monster in your Graveyard, this card gains the following effect:

- Whenever the effect of a Spellcaster-Type monster you control that involves removing Spell Counters is activated, your opponent must reveal 1 Set Spell Card they control or 1 Spell Card in their hand and shuffle it into their Deck. If they cannot, inflict damage to your opponent equal to the number of Spell Counters removed x 500.

[zancrow the flame god]

i gotta admit, her effect is indeed unique. 9/10

[Dream Cabbage]

The OCG is off, but the effect is unique

 

9/10

[Dream Cabbage]

OK

 

 

OCG Fix:

 

When this card is Summoned, you can pay Life Points that are multiples of 500 (max. 1500). Select 1 Spell Card in your Deck or Graveyard that is a Spellcaster-Type monster for each 500 Life Points paid and Set them on your side of the field. If Spellcaster-Type monsters are the only Type of monster in your Graveyard, this card gains the following effect:

- When the effect of a Spellcaster-Type monster you control that involves removing Spell Counters is activated, your opponent must reveal 1 Set Spell Card they control or 1 Spell Card in their hand and shuffle it into their Deck. If they cannot, inflict damage to your opponent equal to the number of Spell Counters removed x 500.

[Dandelo]

Well, Spell Cards can't be... Spellcaster-Type monsters, lol.

 

Comments on the actual card—not just on "OCG errors"—would be great.

[Bobbyman46]

increments? unique but some OCG errors

[Dandelo]

Well' date=' Spell Cards can't be... Spellcaster-Type monsters, lol.

 

Comments on the actual card—[b']not just on "OCG errors"[/b]—would be great.

 

Errors have already been pointed out, but thanks anyways.

[arcfigter]

unique indeed

[Dandelo]

Lol, yes...

[bazgrewal]

That is unique and pretty cool.

[Dandelo]

Lol, alrighty. Thanks.

[lookatthatawesomecard15]

some ocg errors, but other than that, I likeThem!