Luna Lovegood Posted July 20, 2010 Report Share Posted July 20, 2010 [align=center][spoiler=RTOB-EN001]The most powerful Sea Serpent in terms of attack and defense. No one has faced this beast and survived.[/align] [align=center][spoiler=RTOB-EN002]Once per turn, when a Spell Card is activated, you can add 1 Sea Serpent-Type monster from your Deck to your hand. If it has "Deep" in it's card name, you can pay Life Points equal to it's Level x 300 to Special Summon it.[/align] [align=center][spoiler=RTOB-EN003]Activate only when a Monster is destroyed as a result of battle. All face-up Sea Serpent Type Monsters gain 1000 ATK until the end of this turn. All Battle Damage inflicted until the end of this turn is reduced to 0.[/align] [align=center][spoiler=RTOB-EN004]If you Tribute Summon a Sea Serpent Type Monster, you can treat this 1 monster as 2 Tributes. If you do, the Summoned monster cannot be destroyed by Card Effect until the end of your opponent's next turn.[/align] [align=center][spoiler=RTOB-EN005]This card cannot be Normal Summoned or Set. This card can only be Special Summoned by Destroying 1 face-up 'Blue Beast of the Deep' or any three face-up Sea Sepent Type Monsters. This card cannot be destroyed by battle. If this card is sent to the Graveyard by the effect of a Sea-Serpent monster, then you can Special Summon 1 'Blue Beast of the Deep' from your Graveyard.[/align] [align=center][spoiler=RTOB-EN006]Tribute this card to destroy two cards your opponent controls.[/align] [align=center][spoiler=RTOB-EN007]No one knows what this beast truly looks like. All that have seen it have perished into the ocean.[/align] Image credit goes to various YCM artists. I'm working on more, don't worry ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luna Lovegood Posted July 21, 2010 Author Report Share Posted July 21, 2010 BUMP Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caner5000 Posted July 21, 2010 Report Share Posted July 21, 2010 Minor errors....Almost perfect, Just that to me RTOB-EN005 is op'd and in RTOB-EN006 "two" should be "2". But i like them i give a 9.9/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sylphiend Posted July 21, 2010 Report Share Posted July 21, 2010 Could see 006, other than a few OCG errors, these cards are quite good, 8.5/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luna Lovegood Posted July 21, 2010 Author Report Share Posted July 21, 2010 I don't see how it is overpowered, seeing as you either need to tribute 3 monsters, or 1 monster which in itself requires two tributes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caner5000 Posted July 21, 2010 Report Share Posted July 21, 2010 I don't see how it is overpowered' date=' seeing as you either need to tribute 3 monsters, or 1 monster which in itself requires two tributes[/quote']Well to me (Just to me) 3000 ATK plus not being able to be destroyed in battle, and just 3 monsters, is a little to much, lowering the ATK to me would make it more balanced, and I thought that your not suppose to say "two" your suppose to put the number. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luna Lovegood Posted July 21, 2010 Author Report Share Posted July 21, 2010 I don't see how it is overpowered' date=' seeing as you either need to tribute 3 monsters, or 1 monster which in itself requires two tributes[/quote']Well to me (Just to me) 3000 ATK plus not being able to be destroyed in battle, and just 3 monsters, is a little to much, lowering the ATK to me would make it more balanced, and I thought that your not suppose to say "two" your suppose to put the number. I dunno about the OCG, but destroying a 3000 ATK monster by card effects is easier then by battle, and since it was the boss monster, it needed some form of invincibility Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caner5000 Posted July 21, 2010 Report Share Posted July 21, 2010 I don't see how it is overpowered' date=' seeing as you either need to tribute 3 monsters, or 1 monster which in itself requires two tributes[/quote']Well to me (Just to me) 3000 ATK plus not being able to be destroyed in battle, and just 3 monsters, is a little to much, lowering the ATK to me would make it more balanced, and I thought that your not suppose to say "two" your suppose to put the number. I dunno about the OCG, but destroying a 3000 ATK monster by card effects is easier then by battle, and since it was the boss monster, it needed some form of invincibilityGuess your right. Still give a 9.9/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ｎｏ.３９ 希望皇ホープ Posted July 21, 2010 Report Share Posted July 21, 2010 Overall these cards, coupled with existing Sea Serpents, could make a powerful Beatdown Deck@005 Destroying = tributing@006 two = 2these were the only OCG errors I noticed, although I wasn't very thurogh, pics are good, effects are pretty much balanced in my opinion... 8.5/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luna Lovegood Posted July 21, 2010 Author Report Share Posted July 21, 2010 Thanks for the rate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ComingSoonNOT123 Posted July 21, 2010 Report Share Posted July 21, 2010 you have some OCG errors, some effects are quite bland but overall the cards are decent :)glad to see some vanilla cards Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luna Lovegood Posted July 21, 2010 Author Report Share Posted July 21, 2010 Thanks :) You should try and remember not every card needs 10 different effects to be 'creative'. Sometimes, simple cards that work together are creative Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luna Lovegood Posted August 1, 2010 Author Report Share Posted August 1, 2010 BUMP Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Espikeyrey Posted August 1, 2010 Report Share Posted August 1, 2010 It was pretty cool! Nice pics! Pretty good decent effects... a little typos though... 8/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.