Zeaux Posted July 28, 2010 Report Share Posted July 28, 2010 Armagedon Dragon FIRE•••••••Dragon/EffectATK 2400/DEF 2000 1 Tuner + 1 or more non-Tuner monstersWhen this card is Synchro Summoned, you can return up to 2 cards from your Graveyard to the top of your Deck. You can skip your draw phase to destroy cards on the field up to the number of cards in your hand. Take damage equal to the number of cards destroyed by this effect x300. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phantom M.C. Posted July 28, 2010 Report Share Posted July 28, 2010 this might be a stupid question, but what happens when there are more cards in your hand than on the field? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kato_Zenamara Posted July 28, 2010 Report Share Posted July 28, 2010 I would assume you just destroy as many cards as you can, but you should reword the effect anyway, as to avoid said confusion, although I'm not exactly sure how :P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zeaux Posted July 28, 2010 Author Report Share Posted July 28, 2010 I guess you guys are right, but I don't know how to word it right too. =/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kato_Zenamara Posted July 28, 2010 Report Share Posted July 28, 2010 "You can skip your draw phase to destroy cards on the field up to the number of cards in your hand." Or something like that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zeaux Posted July 28, 2010 Author Report Share Posted July 28, 2010 Fits perfect to me. Thank you dude. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HitoKage Posted July 28, 2010 Report Share Posted July 28, 2010 Nice card Zeaux. Though might want to lower the ATK just a little. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shelds9 Posted July 29, 2010 Report Share Posted July 29, 2010 I think the proper ocg is "You can skip your draw phase to destroy cards on the field equal to the number of cards in your hand." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doomassasinx Posted July 29, 2010 Report Share Posted July 29, 2010 since it has a dam good effect its attack should be lowered to 2300 or something around that. your right hito. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zeaux Posted July 29, 2010 Author Report Share Posted July 29, 2010 @shelds9: it is actually the same thing that is on my card, and Draw Phase must be capitalized. IDK Thanks peoples, I'll lower it's ATK and edit the OCG. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DroutTrigger Posted July 29, 2010 Report Share Posted July 29, 2010 ì like the pic of the card and the effect its pretty good, i think its atk is ok since it has some draw backs to it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doomassasinx Posted July 29, 2010 Report Share Posted July 29, 2010 your right about 1 thing drout, the pic is epic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D.A._Sakuyamon Posted July 29, 2010 Report Share Posted July 29, 2010 everything is ok, i like the effect, image is meh7.24359023/10 <--thats how i rate Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zeaux Posted July 29, 2010 Author Report Share Posted July 29, 2010 Weird way to rate, but thats okay. G-GThanks peoples. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anbu-of-Sand Posted July 29, 2010 Report Share Posted July 29, 2010 The first effect is great for recycling your used cards. Especially cards that are needed or limited, like MST, Heavy Storm, etc. But, what is OP'd about this first effect is that it lacks a drawback. That second effect can be great card destruction, with an agreeable drawback of skipping the draw phase. That last effect is just another simple drawback, but IMO, is to high of a drawback as well. Even though it's just x300, I think the numbered should be lowered to a simple 200. Overall, lovely card for recycling and card destruction. If you don't mind my asking, how the heck did you center your stuff? xD The [align=center][/align] code doesn't work on the new YCM anymore D: Oh and 9.8/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zeaux Posted July 29, 2010 Author Report Share Posted July 29, 2010 lol thanks. Just remove the align thing, and instead of [/align] use [/center] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Legiit Posted July 29, 2010 Report Share Posted July 29, 2010 hmm isnt Armageddon spelled wrong tho?? should have 2 d's.. otherwise 7.50/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zeaux Posted July 29, 2010 Author Report Share Posted July 29, 2010 Didn't know about it. Thank you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cloister Posted July 29, 2010 Report Share Posted July 29, 2010 I love it Zeaux. ;D Great destruction effect. And its name should be Armageddon with 2 d's. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Rai Posted July 29, 2010 Report Share Posted July 29, 2010 Loving the card. To be honest, not too many real cards actually have a good selective destruction effect but the cost balances it out well and cleverly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DX DX USER Posted July 29, 2010 Report Share Posted July 29, 2010 Wow, the pic is great! Were did you find it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zeaux Posted July 29, 2010 Author Report Share Posted July 29, 2010 Thanks peoples! ^-^Card has been edited. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Rai Posted July 29, 2010 Report Share Posted July 29, 2010 To be honest, I liked it better at 2600. Oh well, 2400's good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zeaux Posted July 29, 2010 Author Report Share Posted July 29, 2010 Me too, but peoples are saying this way it is over powered, and blah, blah, blah... anyway, 2400 is not that bad thought. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.