LiAM Posted August 1, 2010 Report Share Posted August 1, 2010 Das Weiße Licht = The White Light. (Yeah the second half of the effect does seem odd, but who would use it while they control LIGHT monsters? Plus needed something to add on to make it less... simple?) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
♥ ЅϯᵲåώӀӞ℮ᴙʀɣ−ɴɨɨ−ƈħåɴ ♥ Posted August 1, 2010 Report Share Posted August 1, 2010 It would've been fine without the second effect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LiAM Posted August 1, 2010 Author Report Share Posted August 1, 2010 It would've been fine without the second effect. But then I would have been abused for making a card with a too simple effect. And really, 1000 Life Points IF they do actually have a LIGHT monster. Which, would be a low possibility, and if they do have like only 1, it's 1000 LP, which can easily be removed. ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Archelaus Posted August 1, 2010 Report Share Posted August 1, 2010 Effect seems too impossible to use unless your opponent is terrible at the game. It's too inconsistent. 8/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Archwing Posted August 1, 2010 Report Share Posted August 1, 2010 Its generic (But Generic is fine)And i agree with s.....I cant type those symbols on my computer so im just gonna call her Strawberry-nii-chan that the last effect probably isnt nessicary but i understand what you mean by making it less simple. 8/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
♥ ЅϯᵲåώӀӞ℮ᴙʀɣ−ɴɨɨ−ƈħåɴ ♥ Posted August 1, 2010 Report Share Posted August 1, 2010 There's nothing wrong with having a simple effect, since as long as it's proper, it still counts as a realistic card. You can't agree that with all the 90% of cards here and their 4+ line effects, they're all realistic. So yeah. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LiAM Posted August 1, 2010 Author Report Share Posted August 1, 2010 Effect seems too impossible to use unless your opponent is terrible at the game. It's too inconsistent. 8/10 Marshmallon, Lightsworn, that weird LIGHT version of Mystic Tomato... not to mention other kinds of LIGHT monsters such as Tokens or little Fairy flooding techniques. But thanks, I appreciate your comment :D Its generic (But Generic is fine)And i agree with s.....I cant type those symbols on my computer so im just gonna call her Strawberry-nii-chan that the last effect probably isnt nessicary but i understand what you mean by making it less simple. 8/10XD okay :) There's nothing wrong with having a simple effect, since as long as it's proper, it still counts as a realistic card.You can't agree that with all the 90% of cards here and their 4+ line effects, they're all realistic.So yeah. I suppose you're right, but I would've been called unimaginative. I like making simple 'realistic' cards, so might get back into it, like really into it, not just "this card gains 500ATK" cos that's boring XD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Archelaus Posted August 1, 2010 Report Share Posted August 1, 2010 Marshmallon, Lightsworn, that weird LIGHT version of Mystic Tomato... not to mention other kinds of LIGHT monsters such as Tokens or little Fairy flooding techniques. But thanks, I appreciate your comment :D ITT: Generic monster removal doesn't exist. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BulletMan Posted August 1, 2010 Report Share Posted August 1, 2010 If you have 5 Light monsters out, you should be winning this turn. The condition for using it isn't good, and all you get from it is to destroy a few monsters? And if they control a LIGHT themselves, they gain more LP. :/ The cost is to much. Outcome is UP'd and the last effect isn't needed at all. Rather use Lightning Vortex. IDK how to help you on this one unless you redo the card COMPLETELY. :/ okay art. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LiAM Posted August 1, 2010 Author Report Share Posted August 1, 2010 If you have 5 Light monsters out, you should be winning this turn. The condition for using it isn't good, and all you get from it is to destroy a few monsters? And if they control a LIGHT themselves, they gain more LP. :/ The cost is to much. Outcome is UP'd and the last effect isn't needed at all. Rather use Lightning Vortex. IDK how to help you on this one unless you redo the card COMPLETELY. :/ okay art. Remove last effect or lower LIGHT monster criteria? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
♥ ЅϯᵲåώӀӞ℮ᴙʀɣ−ɴɨɨ−ƈħåɴ ♥ Posted August 1, 2010 Report Share Posted August 1, 2010 Just removing the last effect should be fine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LiAM Posted August 1, 2010 Author Report Share Posted August 1, 2010 Alright I'll keep stuff simple next time and try not to please everyone with longer effects :P XD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
:ABC: Posted August 1, 2010 Report Share Posted August 1, 2010 large light sworn support, to me lightsworn seem like swarmers with wulf, so it would be a finisher in a late game using lightsworn, it's like a sub for judgement dragon if he's been milled, good card 8.9/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LiAM Posted August 1, 2010 Author Report Share Posted August 1, 2010 Thanks Apple :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BulletMan Posted August 1, 2010 Report Share Posted August 1, 2010 I'm okay with simple effects. I just don't like simple cards with terrible conditions. EDIT: if JD was milled, you would Reicarnate it or use Beckoning Light. JD is definitely better than this card. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LiAM Posted August 1, 2010 Author Report Share Posted August 1, 2010 I'm okay with simple effects. I just don't like simple cards with terrible conditions. Samezz. "This card can destroy 1 monster" CREATIVE! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.