Snushee Posted August 7, 2010 Report Share Posted August 7, 2010 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phantom M.C. Posted August 7, 2010 Report Share Posted August 7, 2010 its bland, but nothing wrong with that i suppose. 6.5/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smesh Posted August 7, 2010 Report Share Posted August 7, 2010 such a simple effect, but not even done right. it should be "activate" or "Set". 5/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
♥ ЅϯᵲåώӀӞ℮ᴙʀɣ−ɴɨɨ−ƈħåɴ ♥ Posted August 7, 2010 Report Share Posted August 7, 2010 So... More Jinzos in the game...? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alordzynix Posted August 7, 2010 Report Share Posted August 7, 2010 The first card is a copy of Jinzo with a lower ATK and that is Winged-Beast monster. Which is also wrong because it's Winged Beast with out the - in between. Nothing really special here, 6/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phantom M.C. Posted August 7, 2010 Report Share Posted August 7, 2010 The first card is a copy of Jinzo with a lower ATK and that is Winged-Beast monster. Which is also wrong because it's Winged Beast with out the - in between. The second card seems okay, one of the thing I would change is to add "face-up" otherwise people would debate about wheter or not checking face-down cards to see if they have to be destroyed or not (and if that is how it should be, I would add that instead). Nothing really special here, 6/10 the second card is his sig =) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alordzynix Posted August 7, 2010 Report Share Posted August 7, 2010 the second card is his sig =)Yeah, I found that out later, Edited it. I have to get used to this new forum. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.