♥~Blade Created by Magic~♥

[♥Łövëły-Ċħän♥]

Just some equip.

 

This card can only be equipped to a Spellcaster or Warrior-Type monster. If the equipped monster is a Spellcaster-Type monster, it gains 800 ATK and can attack twice during the same Battle Phase. If the equipped monster is a Warrior-Type monster, it gains 500 ATK and when it inflicts damage to your opponent, your opponent must discard up to 2 cards from their hand. The equipped monster cannot attack your opponent directly.

[Anbu-of-Sand]

Blade Created by Magic

 

OCG / Common Sense:

OCG is flawless. No errors whatsoever.

 

Effect:

The effect has to sides, seeing it can be equipped to a Spellcaster or Warrior. The Spellcaster side is great. It gives the Spellcaster an 800 ATK boost and lets that Spellcaster attack twice during the Battle Phase. These 2 effects work well together because most likely with that 800 ATK boost, the equipped will hopefully, but IMO most likely, be able to run over 2 monsters. The Warrior side only gets a 500 boost, but when inflicts battle damage, makes your opponent discard up to 2 cards, which is great for hand advantage / control. So the effect is quite flexible. Drawback of the equipped not being able to attack directly is nice.

 

Usefulness / Balance:

Card is quite useful. You don't see much Spellcaster-Type Decks in the current Meta, but Warriors on the other hand, X(X)-Sabers came to mind. The card may only have 1 drawback, but that drawback greatly helps to balance the card out. The Spellcaster boost of 800 might look a bit too high, but IMO, it's good enough. But if you want, it can be lowered to 600 or 700.

 

Ratings:

OCG / Common Sense: 2/2

Effect: 4/4

Usefulness / Balance: 3.8/4

Overall: 9.8/10

[Archwing]

Im not crazy bout the name but the effect is awsome.Picture is great.I dont see and OCG problems. 9.5/10

[♥Łövëły-Ċħän♥]

Thank you both very much. I thought 800 was a bit much and being able to attack twice so that's why I added the last bit.

I thought about X(x)-Sabers for the warrior's effect.

 

Thank you both very much

[NeosWiseman]

No way!!!! I saw this picture just today while browsing with Google o_O

Well, I don't know what to say since I totally agree with Anbu-of-Sand.

The only thing that I would do on this card is swap the effects: the double for the Warrior and the hand destruction for the Wizard ;)

But it's quite good the way it is now. ^_^

[♥Łövëły-Ċħän♥]

Thanks Neos.

 

I think I'll stick with the original set up but thanks a bunch for the comment