Legokun Posted August 18, 2010 Report Share Posted August 18, 2010 I thought I'd give this section a shot, so i made this.Lore:This card is also treated as DARK. Once per turn, if this card were to be Destroyed by a WATER monster, remove the attacking card from play. If you control a non-FIRE monster, this card cannot attack. Image credit, as always, LinkOCG and all that crap appreciated, BrickFist. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Serenity the Candyman Posted August 18, 2010 Report Share Posted August 18, 2010 Very intresting effect i8.25/ 10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Legokun Posted August 18, 2010 Author Report Share Posted August 18, 2010 Thanks for the feedback. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
インフェルニティ・ミラージュ Posted August 18, 2010 Report Share Posted August 18, 2010 This would go great in my Volcanic Deck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Legokun Posted August 18, 2010 Author Report Share Posted August 18, 2010 And the need for a 8 word sentience that serves no point just to say It's good is why?Give it a rating, or leave. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nhmeco Posted August 18, 2010 Report Share Posted August 18, 2010 cool card, nice picture, interesting effect, not one i would use tho not much of a pyro deck guyi give it a 8.3/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CMRenji Posted August 18, 2010 Report Share Posted August 18, 2010 where = were. Not too bad. The OCG is off and it is a little OP'd IMO. Overall it's okay. 8.4/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John A. Zoidberg Posted August 18, 2010 Report Share Posted August 18, 2010 where = were. Not too bad. The OCG is off and it is a little OP'd IMO. Overall it's okay. 8.4/10 this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Legokun Posted August 18, 2010 Author Report Share Posted August 18, 2010 Thanks for the feedback, changed with update. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John A. Zoidberg Posted August 18, 2010 Report Share Posted August 18, 2010 I like it now.I can't think of anything I would change, and I don't see any mistakes.10/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zextra Posted August 18, 2010 Report Share Posted August 18, 2010 It's very interesting. The pic fits the name, which fits the effect. However, this card would be hell in a FIRE deck - a Level 4 with 2200 ATK.Still, I like it 9/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.