burnpsy Posted September 6, 2010 Author Report Share Posted September 6, 2010 [quote name='LeoMence' timestamp='1283730279' post='4604394'] You should tbh. How did Trap Stun @ 2 work? [/quote] Pretty effective at getting rid of TT, Mirror Force, SLR and Bottomless, and for baiting removal. That was pretty much how it worked out. I draw it a lot and used it a lot. That said, I usually didn't use 2 per game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Leo Posted September 6, 2010 Report Share Posted September 6, 2010 [quote name='burnpsy' timestamp='1283731884' post='4604443'] Pretty effective at getting rid of TT, Mirror Force, SLR and Bottomless, and for baiting removal. That was pretty much how it worked out. I draw it a lot and used it a lot. That said, I usually didn't use 2 per game. [/quote] I really don't see space for it :/. Maybe test 1 Trap Stun and 1 Solemn Warning? Btw, my bro has netdeck'd. ;D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
burnpsy Posted September 6, 2010 Author Report Share Posted September 6, 2010 [quote name='LeoMence' timestamp='1283732147' post='4604454'] I really don't see space for it :/. Maybe test 1 Trap Stun and 1 Solemn Warning? Btw, my bro has netdeck'd. ;D [/quote] ...Yeah, I was thinking that too. I was also thinking of siding the second one instead of the 3rd CyDra for when I'm facing weird trap-heavy decks, as those really murder me for obvious reasons. I'm guessing he netdeck'd because of how I did yesterday? Or did he do so before then? Idea: Side 2 Chain Disappearance/Gottoms' E-Call for Sabers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Leo Posted September 6, 2010 Report Share Posted September 6, 2010 [quote name='burnpsy' timestamp='1283733095' post='4604493'] ...Yeah, I was thinking that too. I was also thinking of siding the second one instead of the 3rd CyDra for when I'm facing weird trap-heavy decks, as those really murder me for obvious reasons. I'm guessing he netdeck'd because of how I did yesterday? Or did he do so before then? Idea: Side 2 Chain Disappearance/Gottoms' E-Call for Sabers. [/quote] My bro hates meta. And since you did good, he decided, what the hell, I have enough money. Yeah, your deck is kinda tight on space. Maybe test something else that wasn't working for you, and test Solemn Warning in that places card. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
burnpsy Posted September 6, 2010 Author Report Share Posted September 6, 2010 Looking through my deck, the following card(s) may or may not be removed due to deck redundancy: The second Trap Stun The second Morphtronic Boarden The single Giant Trunade As I said, I only needed one Trap Stun per game most of the time, and actually sided it out a few times. I don't need to main a second Boarden when I have Remoten to search it out - I'd much rather get something to stop my opponent than a monster that I'll likely just set in DEF, return with Accelerator or pay for One for One with. In the case of Trunade - I didn't really need it... In all cases, I think it would be wise to side said card if I remove it from the Main Deck - I can think of a few matchups that benefit from them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
burnpsy Posted September 6, 2010 Author Report Share Posted September 6, 2010 BUMP Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
burnpsy Posted September 9, 2010 Author Report Share Posted September 9, 2010 Changes made: Boarden to Side Trunade to Side +1 Warning -2 Prohibition Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
burnpsy Posted September 10, 2010 Author Report Share Posted September 10, 2010 BUMP Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.