[♥] Jester's Havoc

[♥Łövëły-Ċħän♥]

[center]
[img]http://img843.imageshack.us/img843/6729/142021ob.jpg[/img]
[i]If you control a "Jester" monster, you can return 1 monster you control to your hand during your opponent's Battle Phase to negate an attack. The monster returned by this effect is Special Summoned during your next Standby Phase.[/i][/center]

[Legiit]

I like this card, 10/10. Just where are the Jester Monsters?

[Turmoil]

Wording would be invalid if a jester is removed from the field, means the card stays there with no effect, so add "when the jester monster is removed from the field, destroy this card" or something =]

nice idea, would be outclassed by messenger of peace in most cases, i guess it could be used to abuse effects that activate when they are special summoned

[♥Łövëły-Ċħän♥]

[quote name='Nelly Rock' timestamp='1282865645' post='4569299']
Wording would be invalid if a jester is removed from the field, means the card stays there with no effect, so add "when the jester monster is removed from the field, destroy this card" or something =]

nice idea, would be outclassed by messenger of peace in most cases, i guess it could be used to abuse effects that activate when they are special summoned
[/quote]
What? No idea what your talking about in your first sentence.

>> how is this like Messanger of Peace? The only Jester abusable w/ the last effect is Confit (my personal favorite)

[Turmoil]

If you control a "Jester" monster, you can return 1 monster you control to your hand during your opponent's Battle Phase to negate an attack. The monster returned by this effect is Special Summoned during your next Standby Phase.

__________________

It means that it is just an empty continous spell card if you DONT have a jester on the field, unless that is the way you intended it to be? I mean it would probably be more realistic if you could only activate it when a jester is on the field and when the jester is removed the card is destroyed

also, you didn't specify that it had to be a jester monster, the monster that is removed then special summoned, could be any monster lol

[♥Łövëły-Ċħän♥]

[quote name='Nelly Rock' timestamp='1282866257' post='4569333']
It means that it is just an empty continous spell card if you DONT have a jester on the field, unless that is the way you intended it to be?
[b]o.o um...yea...It's jester Support??[/b]
I mean it would probably be more realistic if you could only activate it when a jester is on the field and when the jester is removed the card is destroyed
[b]It's already realistic enough. It does activate when a jester is on the field. If you have no jesters out, you cant negate anything. This is for Jester protection. Jesters are an incredibly vulnerable mini-arch with scarce defense. This was made to defend them.[/b]

also, you didn't specify that it had to be a jester monster, the monster that is removed then special summoned, could be any monster lol
[b]Thats the point. If I made it specifically return Jester, it'd be UP.[/b]
[/quote]

Boop

[♫♪GoldenBoy♪♫]

[quote name='Nelly Rock' timestamp='1282866257' post='4569333']

It means that it is just an empty continous spell card if you DONT have a jester on the field, unless that is the way you intended it to be? I mean it would probably be more realistic if you could only activate it when a jester is on the field and when the jester is removed the card is destroyed

also, you didn't specify that it had to be a jester monster, the monster that is removed then special summoned, could be any monster lol
[/quote]

The point would be you Summon a Jester monster negate your opponents attack by sending the Jester to the hand and so on. It would eventually get to the point where your opponent couldn't do anything. So IMO tis OP'ed because if played in the right way your card could completely stall your opponent and this card plus Jester Lord you could, excuse for language, it would be anal rape. And Nelly your second sentence no offense makes you seem stupid because the point of the card is it so it could be any monster.

[Turmoil]

and i quote lovely cc:
">> how is this like Messanger of Peace? The only Jester abusable w/ the last effect is Confit (my personal favorite) "
she said jester abusable with LAST effect, why else would i assume she otherwise worded it wrong?

and cursdshiva, it really isn't all that overpowered lol, theres ton of S/T removal these days.

[Zeaux]

I would make it only return the monster. Special Summoning it will make Queen destroy that card. It could work with Lord, but I still prefer Confit, so Special Summoning Confit would make its effect unusable.

[♥Łövëły-Ċħän♥]

Thanks Shiva.

Yea I figured it would make a great loop with Confit.

2 Confit 1 Jester 1 Jester's Havoc

Opponent attacks Jester Lord, return Confit1 to negate.

Your turn, SS Confit.

Opponent attack, return Confit2, opponent's end phase, Confit1 effect activate returns a monster.

Your turn, SS Confit.

Wash, rinse, repeat.

Smexy Loop. Then remembered Confit only triggers by it's own effect.

So now I figure, reverse that.

2 other monsters along w/ 2 Confit and this card.

Return cards A keep Confit save, activate effect.

[♫♪GoldenBoy♪♫]

Hmm Confit is probably the most abusable of the three

[♥Łövëły-Ċħän♥]

=/ I hate Queen. I pray she never gets released into TCG.

Only Jesters we need are Lord and [b][color="#FF00FF"][size="7"]CONFIT[/size][/b][/color]