Trent the Magical Tree Posted January 16, 2008 Report Share Posted January 16, 2008 this card rules... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JerryFreelance Posted January 16, 2008 Report Share Posted January 16, 2008 Right... SO basically This card makes no sense... Level is too low for its stats. IDK what you're trying to say... The card does not rules. How do you have 5 posts and 116 points? 0/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trent the Magical Tree Posted January 16, 2008 Author Report Share Posted January 16, 2008 cuz i rule Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Abstract [Atrocity] Posted January 16, 2008 Report Share Posted January 16, 2008 Right... SO basically This card makes no sense... Level is too low for its stats. IDK what you're trying to say... The card does not rules. How do you have 5 posts and 116 points? 0/10 bad OCG. He means"when this card battles with a non-FIRE monster, itloses 1500 ATK and DEF." as for the posts/points, maybe he won a contest? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JerryFreelance Posted January 16, 2008 Report Share Posted January 16, 2008 k What about the first like, 6 words? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Death12328 Posted January 16, 2008 Report Share Posted January 16, 2008 That would be "When this card battles with a FIRE-Attribute monster the ATK & DEF of this card does not change" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyber Altair Posted January 16, 2008 Report Share Posted January 16, 2008 way bad card. what everybody says is true so listen to them and change the picture. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Junk Raver Posted January 16, 2008 Report Share Posted January 16, 2008 Right... SO basically This card makes no sense... Level is too low for its stats. IDK what you're trying to say... The card does not rules. How do you have 5 posts and 116 points? 0/10 You said it all lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Professor Cobra Posted January 16, 2008 Report Share Posted January 16, 2008 Good pic, grammar problems, a little overpowered. 6/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
God Kaiba™ Posted January 16, 2008 Report Share Posted January 16, 2008 2/20 don't like pic or name effect need sto make more sense and could be better:? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
e-hero sparky Posted January 29, 2008 Report Share Posted January 29, 2008 dont double post, trent. the card 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000/10 :x:x:x:x:x:x:x:x:x:x:x Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saiba Aisu Posted January 29, 2008 Report Share Posted January 29, 2008 Good pic' date=' grammar problems, a little overpowered. 6/10[/quote'] you...idiot. xP Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
werid090 Posted January 30, 2008 Report Share Posted January 30, 2008 Right... SO basically This card makes no sense... Level is too low for its stats. IDK what you're trying to say... The card does not rules. How do you have 5 posts and 116 points? 0/10 well then one get new ideas two umm try to just make SOME GOD DMAN SENSE next time lolso yea that about says it the pic is ok Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RestLess-BoTics Posted January 30, 2008 Report Share Posted January 30, 2008 Improve on your use of words, and improve on the quality of your picture.Once you correct these errors, this card will be about perfect! Keep up the good work! :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Master of Dark Posted January 30, 2008 Report Share Posted January 30, 2008 Picture: 7 /10OCG: 5 /10Effect 5 /10ATK and DEF: 3 /10 ( overpowered ) Total: 20 /40Really Sorry. Try to Improve by making more cards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.