John A. Zoidberg Posted September 11, 2010 Report Share Posted September 11, 2010 Before viewing the card, I ask you to read this introduction. Here was my idea for this card: What if there was a fusion monster, that technically wasn't a fusion, and needed a spell card as part of the fusion materials? 1 monster and 1 spell? And then, this card was born. Enjoy OCG fixes, comments, and criticism are welcome. [img]http://img833.imageshack.us/img833/5443/227682j.jpg[/img] [spoiler=Lore]This card cannot be Normal Summoned or Set. This card can only be Special Summoned by sending 1 "Goblin Attack Force" equipped with "Axe of Despair" to the Graveyard. At the End Phase a turn this card attacked, change it to face-up Defense Position. If this card is destroyed by the effect of a Spell or Trap card, add 1 "Goblin Attack Force" or 1 "Axe of Despair" from your Deck to your hand.[/spoiler] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prince Mush Posted September 11, 2010 Report Share Posted September 11, 2010 Haha. a "Fusion" with a monster and spell. Original. I was blown away by the pic. It is definitely the pic that I would say matches the original. Very well done. Although I wouldn't trade in a Goblin Attack Force with 3300 ATK for one with 2800. I know there's some explanation. 9/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John A. Zoidberg Posted September 11, 2010 Author Report Share Posted September 11, 2010 [quote name='Prince Mush' timestamp='1284223628' post='4617166'] Haha. a "Fusion" with a monster and spell. Original. I was blown away by the pic. It is definitely the pic that I would say matches the original. Very well done. Although I wouldn't trade in a Goblin Attack Force with 3300 ATK for one with 2800. I know there's some explanation. 9/10 [/quote] Good point, very good point indeed. Maybe I should implement some kind of burn effect at the end? Such as, "If this card attacks and your opponent takes 1000 or less damage, they lose 1000 Life Points." I know my OCG isn't much right there, but I just sorta threw that together. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prince Mush Posted September 11, 2010 Report Share Posted September 11, 2010 Yeah, an extra effect would make it a better trade. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chedbonlahor Posted September 11, 2010 Report Share Posted September 11, 2010 Its a very nice/unique card, I can't say I have seen a fusion between a monster an spell before so bravo for the thought. First the OCG is very good but I think it just needs polishing off, allow me: "This card cannot be Normal Summoned or Set. This card cannot be Special Summoned except by sending 1 "Goblin Attack Force" equipped with "Axe of Despair" to the Graveyard. This card is changed to Defence Position at the End Phase of a turn this card declares an attack. If this card is destroyed by the effect of a Spell or Trap card, add 1 "Goblin Attack Force" or 1 "Axe of Despair" from your Deck to your hand." That should do it The only 1 criticism I have of the card is the image, I appreciate there are little or perhaps no images that reflect a fusion between GAF and AoD but there is something slightly blocky and wrong with the image. However, this is only a minor grievance and the card in general is great. 9.2/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buttercup Posted September 11, 2010 Report Share Posted September 11, 2010 A better summoning condition like "You can Tribute 1 face-up Defense Position Warrior-Type monster you control to Special Summon this card in Attack Position" would be nice. As it is 4/10 UP Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John A. Zoidberg Posted September 11, 2010 Author Report Share Posted September 11, 2010 [quote name='Ser Warjacksworth' timestamp='1284232061' post='4617679'] A better summoning condition like "You can Tribute 1 face-up Defense Position Warrior-Type monster you control to Special Summon this card in Attack Position" would be nice. As it is 4/10 UP [/quote] No. I wouldn't do that BECAUSE I wanted to make it specific. I know right now it's UP, but you obviously didn't read that I was adding an extra effect or 2 when I felt like it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.