Jump to content

Vongola Headquarters [A KHR Organization] "Ready for a Mafia Summer!"

Super Chaos Sonic

By Super Chaos Sonic
in Clubs & Organizations

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 11.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Super Chaos Sonic Newbie

Super Chaos Sonic

Posted
  • Author
Posted

[quote name='Fusion X. Denver' timestamp='1320880432' post='5629200']
^You have the weirdest smilies I've ever seen. <-Compliment?
Leave Sonic and his porn alone, he's a [s]disgusting[/s] teenager after all >_>
[/quote]
I love you too Fuse <_< XD

[quote name='☽☖☠☗☾JAX☼COB☽☗☠☖☾' timestamp='1320879918' post='5629176']
REALLY!??!?!?!
What's my character like? [sub]:[/sub]D
Or rather,
what's the person the name is for like? [u]:[/u]D
[/quote]
I'm not spoiling...but Jaxcob Thanatos has acted a bit like Desu's character. Trying to kill the current Lightning guardian to take his spot. In Nobuo's situation...he's tried to kill Katie.

[quote name='Desperado Panda' timestamp='1320880443' post='5629203']
[color=#0000CD]I made a one-shot and put you in it. You really had no purpose but to be quickly killed off. :3[/color]

[color=#0000CD]But don't worry. My story was horrible uncanon. :,)[/color]
[/quote]
Gee, thanks Desu...lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Desu the Blue Nerd Newbie

Desu the Blue Nerd

Posted
Posted

[quote name='Chaos Sonic' timestamp='1320880630' post='5629220']
I'm not spoiling...but Jaxcob Thanatos has acted a bit like Desu's character. Trying to kill the current Lightning guardian to take his spot. In Nobuo's situation...he's tried to kill Katie.
[/quote]

[color=#0000cd]She was dead before I got there. DX[/color]

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Desu the Blue Nerd Newbie

Desu the Blue Nerd

Posted
Posted

[quote name='Itachi V. Remo' timestamp='1320881693' post='5629272']
More like bdsm

WITH ME AS THE SADISTIC MASTER
[/quote]

[color=#0000cd]I'm not surprised. I'm not into BDSM. Doesn't work for me.[/color]
[quote name='Chaos Sonic' timestamp='1320882706' post='5629287']
Yeah right. LOL

Anyway, since Fuse said yes...I'll be filling you all in on one part of the fic.

Nobuo, Jaxcob, and Bel are being suspects on a case with someone threatening the Vongola guardians.
[/quote]

[color=#0000cd]It was none of them. Bel would be far too obvious (although you still might) and Nobuo...actually if one of the guardians pissed him off and it was more or less self defense threat and the threat was "I'll slaughter you" then he may have but he'd defend himself better than that to just simply become a suspect. I mean come on! He's me! Jacob is a randomly thrown in character which would make him the most likely of the suspect but he is the lightning guardian now and most likely will be it at the end. You might just pull out another guy who actually did it out of your ass...again...I mean really? Nexev? It actually being Squid (Shooting Stardust Dragon who did have a character in DEF) would have been a way better ending and it'd make sense that a kid (even though it was Sonic in disguise doesn't exactly help) beat him up. And Nexev hates guns. [/color]

[color=#0000cd]P.S. Why the f*ck would Matt send detectives to Katie's (or whatever) apartment to retrieve the Stardust Dragon if he had JUST hit and blackmailed her the night before. SHE WILL MOST LIKELY TELL THEM EVERYTHING!!!![/color]
[color=#0000cd]P.S.S. Obviously I wasn't a fan of Detective Nero. -__-[/color]
[color=#0000cd]P.P.S.S. (Ignoring the fact that I said PP) My guess is that if it isn't a detective Nero then it'll end with you, Nobuo, and Jacob beating the bad guy while they all display the description of their flame very well. Then you realize that we're f*cking awesome and perfect for the part and make them guardians. Close-ish?[/color]

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Fusion X. Denver Newbie

Fusion X. Denver

Posted
Posted

I'll admit, Nexev seemed too random, but I didn't mind since Detective Nero isn't canon anyway.
That [i]could[/i] be the scenario.
OR it might be completely different solely because of what you said.
I'll admit, I've changed the story on a whim based on comments because they either gave me an idea or realized my old one sucked.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Desu the Blue Nerd Newbie

Desu the Blue Nerd

Posted
Posted

[color=#0000cd]Just don't make it Bel. Feels too predictable. And have fun with foreshadowing. It really just seemed like you made it up as you went which I don't think is good for a mystery story.[/color]

[quote name='Fusion X. Denver' timestamp='1320883991' post='5629333']
I'll admit, Nexev seemed too random, but I didn't mind since Detective Nero isn't canon anyway.
That [i]could[/i] be the scenario.
OR it might be completely different solely because of what you said.
I'll admit, I've changed the story on a whim based on comments because they either gave me an idea or realized my old one sucked.
[/quote]

[color=#0000cd]Of course I realized by say that it may change drastically from what it originally was.[/color]

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Lt. Colonel Remo Newbie

Lt. Colonel Remo

Posted
Posted

I've got a beef with Princess Chaos T. Sonic. If you disagree with my claim that society has pampered Sonic too long, then read no further. She wants to prostrate the honor, power, independence, laws, and property of entire countries. Faugh. Although she occasionally exhibits a passable simulacrum of rationality, whenever Sonic is presented with the statement that she is a scion of namby-pamby deviants, she spews out the hackneyed excuse that rummy mountebanks should be fêted at wine-and-cheese fund-raisers. Ironically, such screwball logic is likely to convince even more people that Sonic's contrivances have experienced a considerable amount of evolution (or perhaps more accurately, genetic drift) over the past few weeks. They used to be simply devious. Now, not only are they both pouty and amoral, but they also serve as unequivocal proof that Sonic says that the sun rises just for her. What she means by this, of course, is that she wants free reign to teach the next generation how to hate—and whom to hate. Unfortunately, I can already see the response to this letter. Someone, possibly Princess Chaos T. Sonic herself or one of her secret police, will write a flippant piece about how crime-stained I am. If that's the case, then so be it. What I just wrote sorely needed to be written.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Super Chaos Sonic Newbie

Super Chaos Sonic

Posted
  • Author
Posted

[quote name='Itachi V. Remo' timestamp='1320885274' post='5629376']
[s]I've got a beef with Princess Chaos [i]T.[/i] Sonic. If you disagree with my claim that society has pampered Sonic too long, then read no further. She wants to prostrate the honor, power, independence, laws, and property of entire countries. Faugh. Although she occasionally exhibits a passable simulacrum of rationality, whenever Sonic is presented with the statement that she is a scion of namby-pamby deviants, she spews out the hackneyed excuse that rummy mountebanks should be fêted at wine-and-cheese fund-raisers. Ironically, such screwball logic is likely to convince even more people that Sonic's contrivances have experienced a considerable amount of evolution (or perhaps more accurately, genetic drift) over the past few weeks. They used to be simply devious. Now, not only are they both pouty and amoral, but they also serve as unequivocal proof that Sonic says that the sun rises just for her. What she means by this, of course, is that she wants free reign to teach the next generation how to hate—and whom to hate. Unfortunately, I can already see the response to this letter. Someone, possibly Princess Chaos T. Sonic herself or one of her secret police, will write a flippant piece about how crime-stained I am. If that's the case, then so be it. What I just wrote sorely needed to be written.[/s]
[/quote]

No, no, and I say again NO!!!!!

<_<

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Desu the Blue Nerd Newbie

Desu the Blue Nerd

Posted
Posted

[quote name='Chaos Sonic' timestamp='1320885131' post='5629372']
Bel: Ushishishishi~ I'm not here to kill you...on the contrary...I'm here to help.

^ Above was apart of my trailer for the oneshot ^

Ask Fuse, he'll remember it.
[/quote]

[color=#0000cd]Oh yeah. I forgot about that trailer. Needed Nobuo mentioned. Just saying. Well good. That's what I was hoping for. Sounds way better that way.[/color]

[color=#0000cd][spoiler=Oh Remo...][/color]
[color=#0000cd]The only thing worse than being ignorant is not knowing how ignorant you are. That's Queen Remo of Pussylips's problem. Let me begin by saying that one of Queen Remo of Pussylips's fans once said, "Queen Remo of Pussylips has a 'special' perspective on insurrectionism that carries with it a 'special' right to conduct business in a catty, randy way." Now that's pretty funny, of course, but I didn't include that quote just to make you laugh. I included it to convince you that it keeps trying to overthrow the government and eliminate the money system. And if we don't remain eternally vigilant, it will undeniably succeed. No one that I speak with or correspond with is happy about this situation. Of course, I don't speak or correspond with lewd televangelists, Queen Remo of Pussylips's vassals, or anyone else who fails to realize that by portraying eccentric anthropophagi as nymphomaniacs, Queen Remo of Pussylips is telegraphing its intentions to lay down [i]diktats[/i] that force me to shake in my boots from fear. [/color]
[color=#0000cd]Queen Remo of Pussylips has been going around claiming that it is a protective bulwark against the advancing tyranny of lackluster, xenophobic humanity-haters. When challenged about the veracity of that message, Queen Remo of Pussylips attributed its contradictions of the truth to "poetic license". That means "lying". Queen Remo of Pussylips has frequently been spotted making nicey-nice with abhorrent, ignominious nobodies. Is this because it needs their help to create some crotchety, pseudo-psychological profile of me to discredit my opinions? Here's the answer, albeit in a somewhat circuitous and roundabout style: I sometimes ask myself whether the struggle to express my views is worth all of the potential consequences. And I consistently answer by saying that it has repeatedly indicated a desire to panic irrationally and overreact completely. Is that the sound of rarefied respectability that Queen Remo of Pussylips's agents provocateurs so frequently attribute to Queen Remo of Pussylips? The ridiculous blathering of a fastidious, sleazy childish-type is more like it. In fact, Queen Remo of Pussylips claims that we have too much freedom. Well, I beg to differ. [/color]
[color=#0000cd]What so many people find difficult to grasp is that if there's an untold story here, it's that Queen Remo of Pussylips has already begun establishing tacit boundaries and ground rules for the permissible spectrum of opinion. I wish I were joking, but I'm not. What's more, if you were to tell Queen Remo of Pussylips that most of what it says is pure gibberish, it'd just pull its security blanket a little tighter around itself and refuse to come out and deal with the real world. We must wage war on ageism. This is a terrible and awesome responsibility—a crushing responsibility. However, if we stick together we can can show the world that teenagers who want to shock their parents sometimes maintain—with a straight face—that the cure for evil is more evil. Fortunately, most parents don't fall for this fraud because they know that I have no idea why Queen Remo of Pussylips makes such a big fuss over irrationalism. There are far more pressing issues that present themselves and that should be discussed, debated, and solved—issues such as war, famine, poverty, and homelessness. There is also the lesser issue that Queen Remo of Pussylips wants to violate strongly held principles regarding deferral of current satisfaction for long-term gains. Why it wants that, I don't know, but that's what it wants. I can see from the length of what I've written so far that I should save the rest of my comments about Queen Remo of Pussylips for a future letter. Let me close by stating simply that Queen Remo of Pussylips is unable to see any issue in a broad perspective or from more than one side.[/color]
[color=#0000cd][/spoiler][/color]

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Lt. Colonel Remo Newbie

Lt. Colonel Remo

Posted
Posted

So instead of using your secret police you use yourself?

How clever

[spoiler Panda san]

I pride myself on my exactitude. As you'll see from this letter, I provide copious detail and try to be as precise as possible when describing the ways in which Princess Panda , Jr. wants nothing other than absolute ideological and moral lockdown. But before I continue, allow me to explain that Panda is doing more harm than good to her cause. I explained the reason for that just a moment ago. If you don't mind, though, I'll go ahead and explain it again. To begin with, she wants you to believe that those who disagree with her should be cast into the outer darkness, should be shunned, should starve. You should be wary of such claims. Be aware! Be skeptical! Think! Do not be diverted, deceived, or mesmerized by Panda's exploitative opinions.
Although everyone has goals, Panda's goal seems to be to exercise control through indirect coercion or through psychological pressure or manipulation. It's precisely because I could go on in this same vein for hours that Panda's tirades are evil. They're evil because they cause global warming; they make your teeth fall out; they give you spots; they incite nuclear war. And, as if that weren't enough, I once told Panda that irrational freeloaders can't even agree among themselves as to how balmy she is. How did she respond to that? She proceeded to curse me off using a number of colorful expletives not befitting this letter, which serves only to show that Panda argues that the best way to serve one's country is to trick our children into adopting unconventional, disapproved-of opinions and ways of life. I wish I could suggest some incontrovertible chain of apodictic reasoning that would overcome this argument, but the best I can do is the following: She has the nerve to call those of us who insist on a policy of zero tolerance toward obstructionism "conspiracy theorists". No, we're "conspiracy revealers" because we reveal that Panda's cronies have repeatedly been caught placing stumbling blocks in front of those of us who seek value and fulfilment in our personal and professional lives. I had expected better from her and her vaunted flock, but then again, Panda surely believes that it's okay to leave the educational and emotional needs of our children in the inimical hands of iconoclastic, incontinent usurers. What kind of Humpty-Dumpty world is she living in? That's not a rhetorical question. What's more, the answer is so stunning that you may want to put down that cereal spoon before reading. You see, I can't follow Panda's pretzel logic. I do, however, know that we must put an end to her evildoing. Those who claim otherwise do so only to justify their own directionless platitudes.
The vast majority of people would probably be willing to help me provide information and inspiration to as many people as possible. These people simply need information, encouragement, direction, and leadership. I was, however, going to forget about the whole thing when it suddenly occurred to me that Panda argues that I am uncivilized for wanting to unmask her true face and intentions in regard to cynicism. I should point out that this is almost the same argument that was made against Copernicus and Galileo almost half a millennium ago.
In purely political terms, Panda has been trying for some time to sell the public on an incendiarism-based government. Her sales pitch proceeds both pragmatically and emotionally. The pragmatic argument: It's okay if Panda's vituperations initially cause our quality of life to degrade because "sometime", "someone" will do "something" "somehow" to counteract that trend. The emotional argument: She has the trappings of deity. As you can see, neither argument is valid, which should indicate to you that an injustice anywhere is an injustice everywhere. Keep that in mind the next time you catch Panda producing culturally degenerate films and tapes. As I mentioned before, her ability to flap her gums greatly exceeds her cognitive skills. But let me add that she exploits people's nationalistic views and religious fervor to trick them into promoting the lie of onanism. This is equivalent to saying that she maintains that everyone who scrambles aboard the Panda bandwagon is guaranteed a smooth ride. While that happens to be pure fantasy from the world of make-believe, one important fact to consider is that even her trucklers are afraid that she will gag the innocent accused from protesting caciquism-motivated prosecutions in the blink of an eye. I have seen their fear manifested over and over again, and it is further evidence that Panda's pronouncements are built on lies, and they depend on make-believe for their continuation.
There is a simple answer to the question of what to do about Panda's squibs. The difficult part is in implementing the answer. The answer is that we must raise several issues about Panda's disgusting adages that are frequently missing from the drivel that masquerades for discourse on this topic.
Panda's writings are a field of misspellings and misprisions. From this anecdotal evidence I would argue that it's her deep-seated belief that she should supplant one form of injustice with another because "it's the right thing to do". Sure, [i]she[/i] might be able to justify conclusions like that—using biased or one-sided information, of course—but [i]I[/i] prefer to know the whole story. In this case, the whole story is that Panda's provocateurs have the gall to accuse me of poisoning the relationship between teacher and student. Were these demented survivalists born without a self-awareness gene? The answer is rather depressing, but I'll tell you anyway. The answer begins with the observation that ignorance is bliss. This may be why Panda's spin doctors are generally all smiles. Again, it's Panda's belief that my letters demonstrate a desire to support those for whom hatred has become a way of life. I can't understand how anyone could go from anything I ever wrote to such an unsophisticated idea. In fact, my letters generally make the diametrically opposite claim, that if we are going to speak objectively about Panda's metanarratives, we must understand that Panda keeps talking about the importance of her cause. As far as I can tell, her "cause" is to bring ugliness and nastiness into our lives. She deeply believes—and wants us to believe as well—that her cause is just, that it's moral, and that the world will love her for promoting it. In reality, I could go on for pages listing innumerable examples of Panda's obtrusive anecdotes and foolhardy bunco games. I have already written enough, surely, to convince you that Panda is not the only one who needs to reassess her assumptions. Think about stuporous, slatternly maniacs. They too should realize that Panda will undermine the individualistic underpinnings of traditional jurisprudence by the end of the decade. When that event happens, a darkness and evil exceeding anything seen in history will descend over the world. I can hope only that before it does, people will show Panda how she is as wrong as wrong can be. Only then can we catalogue Panda's swindles and perversions.
Panda's politics are in every respect consistent with the school of horny thought that tends to deny citizens the ability to become informed about the destruction that Panda is capable of. Are you beginning to get the picture here? This is a lesson for those with eyes to see. It is a lesson not so much about her brainless behavior but about the way that no one likes being attacked by the most peremptory barmpots I've ever seen. Even worse, Panda exploits our fear of those attacks—which she claims will evolve in the immediate years ahead into biological, chemical, or nuclear attacks—as a pretext to fuel the fires of hatred. If you think that's scary, then you should remember that Panda seizes every opportunity to shift our society from a culture of conscience to a culture of consensus. I cannot believe this colossal clownishness. Any sane person knows that Panda is neither morally nor intellectually consistent. If she were, she wouldn't first substitute breast-beating and schwarmerei for action and honest debate then afterwards decry my observation that her primary goal is to degrade, divide, and destroy our nation. All of her other objectives are secondary to this one supreme purpose. That's why you must always remember that Panda has repeatedly threatened to pit people against each other. Maybe that's just for maximum scaremongering effect. Or maybe it's because I've heard of sneaky things like masochism and pauperism. But I've also heard of things like nonviolence, higher moralities, and treating all beings as ends in and of themselves—ideas which Panda's ignorant, unthinking, lackluster brain is too small to understand.
How dare Panda fracture family unity? Forgive me if I ramble; I'm really upset, as I think you can tell. Her true goal is to prop up corrupt despots around the world. All the statements that her zealots make to justify or downplay that goal are only apologetics; they do nothing to fight the warped, distorted, misshapen, unwholesome monstrosity that Panda's reports have become.
Panda constantly insists that it's perfectly safe to drink and drive. But she contradicts herself when she says that human life is expendable. Furthermore, she claims to have turned over a new leaf shortly after getting caught trying to create anomie. This claim is an outright lie that is still being circulated by Panda's associates. The truth is that Panda is capable of only two things, namely whining and underhanded tricks.
Panda should not ruin my entire day. Not now, not ever. Yawping frotteurism is a disgrace to humanity but it cannot be eliminated by moral lectures or by pious intentions. No, it can be eradicated only if we give her condign punishment. She is so incredibly inarticulate that she really ought to change her name to "Inarticulate McInarticulate, the Inarticulate Queen of the Inarticulate". I'm not going to say why; we all know the reason. It is regrettable that Panda's henchmen have abdicated reason in this debate and allowed themselves to become captive of Panda's lies, distortions, and hysteria. The facts are indisputable, the arguments are impeccable, and the consequences are undeniable. So why does Panda believe that one can understand the elements of a scientific theory only by reference to the social condition and personal histories of the scientists involved? I'll tell you what I think the answer is. I can't prove it, but if I'm correct, events soon will prove me right. I think that she likes to cite poll results that "prove" that the only way to expand one's mind is with drugs—or maybe even chocolate. Really? Have you ever been contacted by one of her pollsters? Chances are good that you never have been contacted and never will be. Otherwise, the polls would show that the question that's on everyone's mind these days is, "Why is it that 99 times out of 100, Panda is covertly inculcating the gross error of inferring that our only chance of saving the planet is to accept unending regulations and straightjacket 'reforms' from her buddies?" I hardly know. But I will stake the immortality of my soul that I recommend paying close attention to the praxeological method developed by the economist Ludwig von Mises and using it as a technique to halt the destructive process that is carrying our civilization toward extinction. The praxeological method is useful in this context because it employs praxeology, the general science of human action, to explain why if you ever ask Panda to do something, you can bet that your request will get lost in the shuffle, unaddressed, ignored, and rebuffed. In summary, Princess Panda , Jr. and her idolators behave like a colony of culicidae decrying the occasional angry slap by those that have been stung by Panda's abhorrent Ponzi schemes. Is anyone listening? Does anyone care?
[/spoiler]

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Desu the Blue Nerd Newbie

Desu the Blue Nerd

Posted
Posted

[quote name='Itachi V. Remo' timestamp='1320885581' post='5629385']
So instead of using your secret police you use yourself?

How clever

[spoiler Panda san]

I pride myself on my exactitude. As you'll see from this letter, I provide copious detail and try to be as precise as possible when describing the ways in which Princess Panda , Jr. wants nothing other than absolute ideological and moral lockdown. But before I continue, allow me to explain that Panda is doing more harm than good to her cause. I explained the reason for that just a moment ago. If you don't mind, though, I'll go ahead and explain it again. To begin with, she wants you to believe that those who disagree with her should be cast into the outer darkness, should be shunned, should starve. You should be wary of such claims. Be aware! Be skeptical! Think! Do not be diverted, deceived, or mesmerized by Panda's exploitative opinions.
Although everyone has goals, Panda's goal seems to be to exercise control through indirect coercion or through psychological pressure or manipulation. It's precisely because I could go on in this same vein for hours that Panda's tirades are evil. They're evil because they cause global warming; they make your teeth fall out; they give you spots; they incite nuclear war. And, as if that weren't enough, I once told Panda that irrational freeloaders can't even agree among themselves as to how balmy she is. How did she respond to that? She proceeded to curse me off using a number of colorful expletives not befitting this letter, which serves only to show that Panda argues that the best way to serve one's country is to trick our children into adopting unconventional, disapproved-of opinions and ways of life. I wish I could suggest some incontrovertible chain of apodictic reasoning that would overcome this argument, but the best I can do is the following: She has the nerve to call those of us who insist on a policy of zero tolerance toward obstructionism "conspiracy theorists". No, we're "conspiracy revealers" because we reveal that Panda's cronies have repeatedly been caught placing stumbling blocks in front of those of us who seek value and fulfilment in our personal and professional lives. I had expected better from her and her vaunted flock, but then again, Panda surely believes that it's okay to leave the educational and emotional needs of our children in the inimical hands of iconoclastic, incontinent usurers. What kind of Humpty-Dumpty world is she living in? That's not a rhetorical question. What's more, the answer is so stunning that you may want to put down that cereal spoon before reading. You see, I can't follow Panda's pretzel logic. I do, however, know that we must put an end to her evildoing. Those who claim otherwise do so only to justify their own directionless platitudes.
The vast majority of people would probably be willing to help me provide information and inspiration to as many people as possible. These people simply need information, encouragement, direction, and leadership. I was, however, going to forget about the whole thing when it suddenly occurred to me that Panda argues that I am uncivilized for wanting to unmask her true face and intentions in regard to cynicism. I should point out that this is almost the same argument that was made against Copernicus and Galileo almost half a millennium ago.
In purely political terms, Panda has been trying for some time to sell the public on an incendiarism-based government. Her sales pitch proceeds both pragmatically and emotionally. The pragmatic argument: It's okay if Panda's vituperations initially cause our quality of life to degrade because "sometime", "someone" will do "something" "somehow" to counteract that trend. The emotional argument: She has the trappings of deity. As you can see, neither argument is valid, which should indicate to you that an injustice anywhere is an injustice everywhere. Keep that in mind the next time you catch Panda producing culturally degenerate films and tapes. As I mentioned before, her ability to flap her gums greatly exceeds her cognitive skills. But let me add that she exploits people's nationalistic views and religious fervor to trick them into promoting the lie of onanism. This is equivalent to saying that she maintains that everyone who scrambles aboard the Panda bandwagon is guaranteed a smooth ride. While that happens to be pure fantasy from the world of make-believe, one important fact to consider is that even her trucklers are afraid that she will gag the innocent accused from protesting caciquism-motivated prosecutions in the blink of an eye. I have seen their fear manifested over and over again, and it is further evidence that Panda's pronouncements are built on lies, and they depend on make-believe for their continuation.
There is a simple answer to the question of what to do about Panda's squibs. The difficult part is in implementing the answer. The answer is that we must raise several issues about Panda's disgusting adages that are frequently missing from the drivel that masquerades for discourse on this topic.
Panda's writings are a field of misspellings and misprisions. From this anecdotal evidence I would argue that it's her deep-seated belief that she should supplant one form of injustice with another because "it's the right thing to do". Sure, [i]she[/i] might be able to justify conclusions like that—using biased or one-sided information, of course—but [i]I[/i] prefer to know the whole story. In this case, the whole story is that Panda's provocateurs have the gall to accuse me of poisoning the relationship between teacher and student. Were these demented survivalists born without a self-awareness gene? The answer is rather depressing, but I'll tell you anyway. The answer begins with the observation that ignorance is bliss. This may be why Panda's spin doctors are generally all smiles. Again, it's Panda's belief that my letters demonstrate a desire to support those for whom hatred has become a way of life. I can't understand how anyone could go from anything I ever wrote to such an unsophisticated idea. In fact, my letters generally make the diametrically opposite claim, that if we are going to speak objectively about Panda's metanarratives, we must understand that Panda keeps talking about the importance of her cause. As far as I can tell, her "cause" is to bring ugliness and nastiness into our lives. She deeply believes—and wants us to believe as well—that her cause is just, that it's moral, and that the world will love her for promoting it. In reality, I could go on for pages listing innumerable examples of Panda's obtrusive anecdotes and foolhardy bunco games. I have already written enough, surely, to convince you that Panda is not the only one who needs to reassess her assumptions. Think about stuporous, slatternly maniacs. They too should realize that Panda will undermine the individualistic underpinnings of traditional jurisprudence by the end of the decade. When that event happens, a darkness and evil exceeding anything seen in history will descend over the world. I can hope only that before it does, people will show Panda how she is as wrong as wrong can be. Only then can we catalogue Panda's swindles and perversions.
Panda's politics are in every respect consistent with the school of horny thought that tends to deny citizens the ability to become informed about the destruction that Panda is capable of. Are you beginning to get the picture here? This is a lesson for those with eyes to see. It is a lesson not so much about her brainless behavior but about the way that no one likes being attacked by the most peremptory barmpots I've ever seen. Even worse, Panda exploits our fear of those attacks—which she claims will evolve in the immediate years ahead into biological, chemical, or nuclear attacks—as a pretext to fuel the fires of hatred. If you think that's scary, then you should remember that Panda seizes every opportunity to shift our society from a culture of conscience to a culture of consensus. I cannot believe this colossal clownishness. Any sane person knows that Panda is neither morally nor intellectually consistent. If she were, she wouldn't first substitute breast-beating and schwarmerei for action and honest debate then afterwards decry my observation that her primary goal is to degrade, divide, and destroy our nation. All of her other objectives are secondary to this one supreme purpose. That's why you must always remember that Panda has repeatedly threatened to pit people against each other. Maybe that's just for maximum scaremongering effect. Or maybe it's because I've heard of sneaky things like masochism and pauperism. But I've also heard of things like nonviolence, higher moralities, and treating all beings as ends in and of themselves—ideas which Panda's ignorant, unthinking, lackluster brain is too small to understand.
How dare Panda fracture family unity? Forgive me if I ramble; I'm really upset, as I think you can tell. Her true goal is to prop up corrupt despots around the world. All the statements that her zealots make to justify or downplay that goal are only apologetics; they do nothing to fight the warped, distorted, misshapen, unwholesome monstrosity that Panda's reports have become.
Panda constantly insists that it's perfectly safe to drink and drive. But she contradicts herself when she says that human life is expendable. Furthermore, she claims to have turned over a new leaf shortly after getting caught trying to create anomie. This claim is an outright lie that is still being circulated by Panda's associates. The truth is that Panda is capable of only two things, namely whining and underhanded tricks.
Panda should not ruin my entire day. Not now, not ever. Yawping frotteurism is a disgrace to humanity but it cannot be eliminated by moral lectures or by pious intentions. No, it can be eradicated only if we give her condign punishment. She is so incredibly inarticulate that she really ought to change her name to "Inarticulate McInarticulate, the Inarticulate Queen of the Inarticulate". I'm not going to say why; we all know the reason. It is regrettable that Panda's henchmen have abdicated reason in this debate and allowed themselves to become captive of Panda's lies, distortions, and hysteria. The facts are indisputable, the arguments are impeccable, and the consequences are undeniable. So why does Panda believe that one can understand the elements of a scientific theory only by reference to the social condition and personal histories of the scientists involved? I'll tell you what I think the answer is. I can't prove it, but if I'm correct, events soon will prove me right. I think that she likes to cite poll results that "prove" that the only way to expand one's mind is with drugs—or maybe even chocolate. Really? Have you ever been contacted by one of her pollsters? Chances are good that you never have been contacted and never will be. Otherwise, the polls would show that the question that's on everyone's mind these days is, "Why is it that 99 times out of 100, Panda is covertly inculcating the gross error of inferring that our only chance of saving the planet is to accept unending regulations and straightjacket 'reforms' from her buddies?" I hardly know. But I will stake the immortality of my soul that I recommend paying close attention to the praxeological method developed by the economist Ludwig von Mises and using it as a technique to halt the destructive process that is carrying our civilization toward extinction. The praxeological method is useful in this context because it employs praxeology, the general science of human action, to explain why if you ever ask Panda to do something, you can bet that your request will get lost in the shuffle, unaddressed, ignored, and rebuffed. In summary, Princess Panda , Jr. and her idolators behave like a colony of culicidae decrying the occasional angry slap by those that have been stung by Panda's abhorrent Ponzi schemes. Is anyone listening? Does anyone care?
[/spoiler]
[/quote]

[color=#0000cd]Well played Queen Pussylips...well played...[/color]
[quote name='Chaos Sonic' timestamp='1320885933' post='5629409']
Wasn't sure if I was adding Nobuo or not...but now I am ^^
[/quote]

[color=#0000cd]But you like just said...wait...do you mean you're editing the trailer....or what?[/color]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...