SuperNarb Posted September 24, 2010 Report Share Posted September 24, 2010 I just came back from a long break and I decided to make an archtype, here it is! [IMG]http://i51.tinypic.com/a2zsko.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]http://i52.tinypic.com/19uvs6.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]http://i52.tinypic.com/vjm6t.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]http://i52.tinypic.com/xfxp42.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]http://i55.tinypic.com/4t0kth.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]http://i51.tinypic.com/zwkyl5.jpg[/IMG] I'll be expanding on this archetype with spells, traps, fuzions, and much more. Please rate and tell me if I should continue!Can somebody post?Rate... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.GhostRyder Posted September 24, 2010 Report Share Posted September 24, 2010 [b][size="2"]Images deserve credit to their recipients. Do this then I rate.[/size][/b] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mugendramon Posted September 24, 2010 Report Share Posted September 24, 2010 They are not very creative. Provide an all-rounder attack base, but can be easily seen through. OCG speaking, you might as well clean off the word 'Attribute' from all of them. It isn't necessary. They can go a bit OP'd against strict-attributed Decks, especially Lightsworns or Naturias. They wouldn't provide much of a threat to Chaos Decks, though... You get a 7/10 from the Monkeh, I encourage you to differ the effects a bit. @Above poster: The new rules say you do not need credit if the owner doesn't ask for it. Or so I've heard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.GhostRyder Posted September 24, 2010 Report Share Posted September 24, 2010 [b][size="2"]I do re-call that rule but I think that Father wolf likes to be credited.[/size][/b] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.