Jazin Kay Posted October 5, 2010 Report Share Posted October 5, 2010 [img]http://img203.imageshack.us/img203/6524/67020.jpg[/img] Cry moar. Also, time set aside to update the archive. Expect it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlackFeatherCrow Posted October 5, 2010 Report Share Posted October 5, 2010 even if it is a level 12 Synchro monster and has also summoning conditions, it is too strong. the tributing effect is quite good and balanced, but the pay 1000 Lp to inflict 1000 (usually the opponent has quite a card combo out to destroy it, or he uses a staple and has maybe a card set. that makes in average 2000 damage. And with the meta at this moment, he may have set 3 or 4 traps... Too much damage. 500 would be better. Or pay 1000 to destroy one card on the field, or so... I also have to mention that the ATK-DEF-LV Relation is a bit imbalanced too. 4500 DEF and 3500 Attack? The Decisive Arms (Lv 10 sycnrho) has 3300 ATK and DEF, added 6600... Your card has added 8000! 1400 Difference, and when you look at the difference of Level 10 to level 8... Its a bit too much in my opinion. But a very nice point is the visual. The Name of the card, the picture and the Type, also the Attribute work pretty well together. Very nice done! Well, Idea is good, balance...well, see upside... and OCG also good... I'll give 6/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jazin Kay Posted October 5, 2010 Author Report Share Posted October 5, 2010 [quote name='BlackFeatherCrow' timestamp='1286286742' post='4680985'] even if it is a level 12 Synchro monster and has also summoning conditions, it is too strong. [b]The majority of YCM is afraid of good cards. Welcome to YCM, enjoy your stay.[/b] the tributing effect is quite good and balanced, but the pay 1000 Lp to inflict 1000 (usually the opponent has quite a card combo out to destroy it, or he uses a staple and has maybe a card set. that makes in average 2000 damage. And with the meta at this moment, he may have set 3 or 4 traps... Too much damage. 500 would be better. Or pay 1000 to destroy one card on the field, or so... [b]That's stupid. My opponent can clearly read the card. Modifying their field to take less damage is what a smart player would do, leaving massive abuse of this card only targeted to players who are retarded or can't read.[/b] I also have to mention that the ATK-DEF-LV Relation is a bit imbalanced too. 4500 DEF and 3500 Attack? The Decisive Arms (Lv 10 sycnrho) has 3300 ATK and DEF, added 6600... Your card has added 8000! 1400 Difference, and when you look at the difference of Level 10 to level 8... Its a bit too much in my opinion. [b]Decisive Arms is LV10. This is LV12. In relation, it's fine. A huge DEF isn't what would break a card like this. ATK/DEF relation to level is a subject of perception, usually by bad players. Cry moar?[/b] But a very nice point is the visual. The Name of the card, the picture and the Type, also the Attribute work pretty well together. Very nice done! Well, Idea is good, balance...well, see upside... and OCG also good... I'll give 6/10 [/quote] Your rating is accepted and noted. Your input, while a bit immature and/or frightened, is also noted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~Jay~ Posted October 5, 2010 Report Share Posted October 5, 2010 Sorry hun, but it's kinda Op'd. I guess it's effect isn't really the problem. It's it's stats. Synchros have powerful effects, we all know that. But to have 3500 ATK just makes matters even worse. The unnecessary amount of DEF strikes me (Probably me personally, most likely). I would suggest at least lowering it's ATK to 3000 and it's DEF to like 2500. By the way: Lifepoints = Life Points But I think you already knew that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jazin Kay Posted October 5, 2010 Author Report Share Posted October 5, 2010 Thor is LV10 and has 3500 ATK. Red Nova Dragon has the same ATK and LV. That argument is moot. And thank you, I missed the Life Points thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~Jay~ Posted October 6, 2010 Report Share Posted October 6, 2010 Like I said it's mainly the stats, he already has 3500 ATK, I think 4500 DEF is just a bit too much. But that's probably my personal opinion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jazin Kay Posted October 6, 2010 Author Report Share Posted October 6, 2010 Your opinion would mean more to me if it had some logic behind it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Envoy of Twilight Posted October 6, 2010 Report Share Posted October 6, 2010 DEF is a bit rediculous but other than that, awesome. 7.9/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~Jay~ Posted October 6, 2010 Report Share Posted October 6, 2010 Whoa! 1000 Life Points for each card they control?! That's a pretty big burn! Don't you think? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jazin Kay Posted October 6, 2010 Author Report Share Posted October 6, 2010 Yeah. If I find myself against this, I better not fill up my field too fast before I decide to rid the field of it and shoot for game, or I might lose the duel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dandelo Posted October 6, 2010 Report Share Posted October 6, 2010 [quote name='Jazin Kay' timestamp='1286336552' post='4683048'] Yeah. If I find myself against this, I better not fill up my field too fast before I decide to rid the field of it and shoot for game, or I might lose the duel. [/quote] I love the logic, haha. If I had any more +reps left for the day to hand out aimlessly, you'd be getting one for that comment. As for the card, the name is random enough to be good, and I don't see why high DEF matters, seeing as i'd much rather have this card remain in Attack Position to, y'know, be able to attack. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dandelo Posted October 6, 2010 Report Share Posted October 6, 2010 [quote name='Jazin Kay' timestamp='1286336552' post='4683048'] Yeah. If I find myself against this, I better not fill up my field too fast before I decide to rid the field of it and shoot for game, or I might lose the duel. [/quote] I love the logic, haha. If I had any more +reps left for the day to hand out aimlessly, you'd be getting one for that comment. As for the card, the name is random enough to be good, and I don't see why high DEF matters, seeing as i'd much rather have this card remain in Attack Position to, y'know, be able to attack. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dandelo Posted October 6, 2010 Report Share Posted October 6, 2010 [quote name='Jazin Kay' timestamp='1286336552' post='4683048'] Yeah. If I find myself against this, I better not fill up my field too fast before I decide to rid the field of it and shoot for game, or I might lose the duel. [/quote] I love the logic, haha. If I had any more +reps left for the day to hand out aimlessly, you'd be getting one for that comment. As for the card, the name is random enough to be good, and I don't see why high DEF matters, seeing as i'd much rather have this card remain in Attack Position to, y'know, be able to attack. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.