Direct Attack! Winged Warrior!

[Kazooie]

Not my best work, but decent enough I suppose. I originally had its attack at 2000, but I figured it would be okay with a little more power.

[center][img]http://img826.imageshack.us/img826/5857/267156o.jpg[/img]
[i]Card Lore:
This card cannot be Normal Summoned or Set. You can Special Summon this card by removing from play 1 WIND monster and 1 Warrior-Type monster from your Graveyard. This card cannot be destroyed by battle. When this card is summoned, you may destroy up to 2 cards on the Field. This effect cannot be negated. You can remove from play 2 monsters you control to allow this card to attack the opponent directly this turn.[/i][/center]

I'm not to sure about the card grammar on this one. A little help with the last effect please?

[snowyash]

Not too much wrong or needs changing probably just specify the type of summon [quote]When this card is summoned, you may destroy up to 2 cards on the Field[/quote] here, remember to capitalise it and it's fine.

Stats are nice and balanced, summoning conditions are fine and the pic is good too. Just a bit unsure on the name though.
This effect should be fine just need to clear up Summoning type to keep it in context.

8/10

[crimsonwendy]

There is an error in the effect. When you say: You can Special Summon this card by removing from play 1 WIND monster and 1 Warrior-Type monster, you need to put were you can remove them from such as the field, graveyard, or hand. The rest of the effect is balanced the ATK and DEF seem fine, the pic is ok, and the OCG seems pretty good.
score 8/10

[Kazooie]

[quote name='SKizophrenIK117' timestamp='1287438062' post='4715772']
Not too much wrong or needs changing probably just specify the type of summon here, remember to capitalise it and it's fine.Stats are nice and balanced, summoning conditions are fine and the pic is good too. Just a bit unsure on the name though.This effect should be fine just need to clear up Summoning type to keep it in context. 8/10
[/quote]

"summoned" refers to any type of summon, including Special Summon, and is not capitalized from what I remember.

The name means Winged Warrior, and is in Latin.

[quote name='crimsonwendy' timestamp='1287438476' post='4715792']
There is an error in the effect. When you say: You can Special Summon this card by removing from play 1 WIND monster and 1 Warrior-Type monster, you need to put were you can remove them from such as the field, graveyard, or hand. The rest of the effect is balanced the ATK and DEF seem fine, the pic is ok, and the OCG seems pretty good.score 8/10
[/quote]

That means you can remove them from play from anywhere, although I meant for it to be only the Graveyard, thanks for bringing it to my attention.

Thanks for the comments. :[i][/i]D

[Anti-Apocryphal]

"This card cannot be Normal Summoned or Set. You can Special Summon this card by removing from play 1 WIND monster and 1 Warrior-Type monster from your Graveyard. This card cannot be destroyed by battle. When this card is [b]S[/b]ummoned, you may destroy up to 2 cards on the Field. This effect cannot be negated. You can remove from play 2 monsters you control to allow this card to attack [b]your[/b] opponent directly this turn."

I think.
Nice card and effect, 8.9/10.

[crimsonwendy]

With the repair to the card I shall higher your score to:
9/10^^

[Phantom M.C.]

[i]This effect cannot be negated.

^^ i really feel that this part is unneeded.

[/i][i]you may destroy up to 2 cards on the Field.

^^change "may" to "can"

[/i][i]You can remove from play 2 monsters you control to allow this card to attack the opponent directly this turn.

^^change "allow" to "let" and "the opponent" to "your opponent"

seems good overall, 8/10
[/i]

[snowyash]

I just thought you ought to specify the Summon type as the card had already stated that it can't be Normal Summoned or Set, that's all.

[inquistidor]

i like everything about it but the "destroy 2 cards on the field" effect sounds kinda out of nowhere and extremely overpowered, plus its unstoppable. you could make a deck based around this card and wind types and warrior and it'd be the new chaos. imo, the attacking directly effect isnt nearly as important as the destruction effect. actually i change my mind this seems pretty reasonable. gj
nice artwork btw.

10/10

if you did think about rebalancing, maybe make it to destroy 1 card, and the direct attack shuld only be remove 1 monster, which is pretty fair.

[Tee-Jaie]

I say 9-10. No spam, just my thought.