forteller Posted October 23, 2010 Report Share Posted October 23, 2010 should this card be the start of a set??? [img]http://img837.imageshack.us/img837/6058/291097z.jpg[/img] This monster cannot be selected as an attack target if your opponent controls 1 or more Warrior type monsters. When your opponent declares an attack on a monster you control(other than this monster) you can switch this monster to defense position to have the selected attack target gain 700 ATK as long as this monster remains in face up defense position. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
forteller Posted October 23, 2010 Author Report Share Posted October 23, 2010 bump Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DannyGirl Posted October 23, 2010 Report Share Posted October 23, 2010 This is so meh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
forteller Posted October 23, 2010 Author Report Share Posted October 23, 2010 lol thats spaming u have to rate\comment on the card Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Smeagle Posted October 23, 2010 Report Share Posted October 23, 2010 Take out the last sentence about not attacking, raise the boost to 700. Then it might be worth a splash in a deck with low-level Warriors to protect your Tuners and whatnot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DannyGirl Posted October 23, 2010 Report Share Posted October 23, 2010 see forteller your card is bad too [quote]Take out the last sentence about not attacking, raise the boost to 700. Then it might be worth a splash in a deck with low-level Warriors to protect your Tuners and whatnot. [/quote] I agree with him i see you were trying to balance the card but you went a little too far Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
forteller Posted October 23, 2010 Author Report Share Posted October 23, 2010 so ill guess ill change it now Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
forteller Posted October 25, 2010 Author Report Share Posted October 25, 2010 update thxs people for the help Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
forteller Posted October 25, 2010 Author Report Share Posted October 25, 2010 update thxs people for the help Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DannyGirl Posted October 25, 2010 Report Share Posted October 25, 2010 yeah i like it better now 8/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
forteller Posted October 26, 2010 Author Report Share Posted October 26, 2010 bump Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
forteller Posted October 30, 2010 Author Report Share Posted October 30, 2010 bump Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord_of_Cards_55 Posted October 30, 2010 Report Share Posted October 30, 2010 u spelt warrior wrong. Other than that good card!^^ 8/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
forteller Posted October 30, 2010 Author Report Share Posted October 30, 2010 lol thxs i fixed it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
forteller Posted November 1, 2010 Author Report Share Posted November 1, 2010 bump Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
forteller Posted November 13, 2010 Author Report Share Posted November 13, 2010 bump Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
forteller Posted November 16, 2010 Author Report Share Posted November 16, 2010 bump Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anbu-of-Sand Posted November 16, 2010 Report Share Posted November 16, 2010 [color=blue][b]Xenon - The Alias Warrior, School Girl[/b][/color] [b]OCG / Common Sense:[/b] This monster cannot be selected as an attack target if your opponent controls 1 or more Warrior[b]-Ty[/b]ype monsters. When your opponent declares an attack [b]on a monster you control other than this card,[/b] you can switch this monster to [b]D[/b]efense [b]P[/b]osition to have the attack target gain 700 ATK as long as this monster remains in face[b]-[/b]up [b]Defense [/b]Position. [b]Effect / Originality:[/b] To start off, the monster is protected as long as your opponent controls at least 1 Warrior-Type, which is....alright I guess. The monster can also switch to Defense Position all for increasing the ATK of a monster you control that's getting attacked other then this card by 700, as long as this monster stays in said position that is. Not the most original, but it seems the concepts somewhat mesh together pretty well. [b]Usefulness / Balance:[/b] Problem is, I don't think the card is that usable. To start off, the protection effect is only useful when you know your opponent is running a Warrior-Type somewhat heavy Deck, which makes that first part situational. The second part even though is a nifty 700 ATK boost, won't help if the monster getting attacked is in Defense Position. the fact this monster's DEF is somewhat poor makes matters worse. The best thing to do is make the first effect protecting this monster from attacks only happen when they control 2 or more monsters, no specific Type and whatnot, just 2 or more monsters. Also changing the monster to have better DEF stats rather than ATK would fit this card's effect better as well. Perhaps 1600 ATK and 2400 DEF? Or something along those lines. Also, the 700 ATK boost isn't that bad, but seems a tad high. 600 would do just fine. And perhaps the effect only happens if an Attack Position monster you control is attacked, seeing this main effect is somewhat useless when the attacked monster is in Defense Position. Otherwise, it seems a tad bit situational, but if you do the following, the card can become more usable. [b]Ratings:[/b] OCG / Common Sense: 1/2 Effect / Originality: 2.2/4 Usefulness / Balance: 2.4/4 [b]Overall: 5.6/10[/b] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheFantasy Posted November 16, 2010 Report Share Posted November 16, 2010 i like that card but it seems a bit to OP'ed to me. don't know why @.@ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.