PEDRO GIL NEVES Posted October 24, 2010 Report Share Posted October 24, 2010 that's fantastic !!!! [img]http://img826.imageshack.us/img826/5218/304427.jpg[/img] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anti-Apocryphal Posted October 24, 2010 Report Share Posted October 24, 2010 1) Where's the Ritual Spell Card? 2) Needs an effect also stating that it requires the Ritual Spell Card. 3) "This card is not effected by Trap and Spell cards." 4) Your effect is OP'ed 5) This card is not playable 6) INF? I'll have to double-check, but I've never heard of it 7) If you add a decent effect to it, it might be playable If you give it a [u]real[/u] ATK and DEF, it might make more sense 9) This card gets a .5/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jaime Duferier Posted October 24, 2010 Report Share Posted October 24, 2010 [quote name='Future Paradise' timestamp='1287925046' post='4731636'] 1) Where's the Ritual Spell Card? 2) Needs an effect also stating that it requires the Ritual Spell Card. 3) "This card is not [b]a[/b]ffected by Trap and Spell cards." 4) Your effect is OP'ed 5) This card is not playable 6) INF? I'll have to double-check, but I've never heard of it 7) If you add a decent effect to it, it might be playable If you give it a [u]real[/u] ATK and DEF, it might make more sense 9) This card gets a .5/10 [/quote] I think you have that just about covered, INF means infinite, and I think that 5/10 is GENEROUS with this sort of card. 2/10, this newbie has no idea what he is doing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ieyasu Tokugawa Posted October 24, 2010 Report Share Posted October 24, 2010 [quote name='Future Paradise' timestamp='1287925046' post='4731636'] 1) Where's the Ritual Spell Card? 2) Needs an effect also stating that it requires the Ritual Spell Card. 3) "This card is not effected by Trap and Spell cards." 4) Your effect is OP'ed 5) This card is not playable 6) INF? I'll have to double-check, but I've never heard of it 7) If you add a decent effect to it, it might be playable If you give it a [u]real[/u] ATK and DEF, it might make more sense 9) This card gets a .5/10 [/quote] He also forgot the whole union thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bahamut - Envoy of the End Posted October 24, 2010 Report Share Posted October 24, 2010 Alright, alright, calm down all. Let's not put the guy off this site before he's got used to it. Now Pedro, welcome to YCM. Good to see you getting involved immediately in the cardmaking, I admire your enthusiasm. But I won't sugar coat it, it's not a fantastic card. But don't despair, there are people here who can help. First of all, have a look at the work of other cardmakers on this site, I recommend viewing cards made by Lovely CC and Spoon. Try to see what makes their cards powerful, yet balanced at the same time. Second of all, have a think about your cards. Ask yourself, how would I use this card in a duel? Is it fair towards my opponent for me to use at all (this is what is meant by balance)? What I'd recommend to any new user like yourself is have a look around, study other cardmakers, ask questions, and have a play with the cardmaker. Try making some Lv4 or lower effect monsters that have funky little effects. Nothing too ambitious or ridiculously powerful, just little support monsters and spells that can be useful in various decks. You may also be interested in using the pictures available in the Showcase section of this forum. You are welcome to use them as long as you give credit to the artists in your posts. Hope this helps. Matt Bahamut Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
♠>:Stick-Man:<♠ Posted October 24, 2010 Report Share Posted October 24, 2010 Not fantastic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ozuma_lord_of_the_fire Posted October 26, 2010 Report Share Posted October 26, 2010 No fantastic, you can't even summon that card -.- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.