lewis atherton Posted October 24, 2010 Report Share Posted October 24, 2010 Please leave honest and fair comments. [img]http://img593.imageshack.us/img593/6562/303169b.jpg[/img] This Card may not be destroyed in Battle (normal damage calculations apply). If there is another monster card with “Deceiving Beauty”i n its name on your side of the field, then ithis card may Attack your opponents Life points directly. [img]http://img837.imageshack.us/img837/2869/303169v.jpg[/img] If this the only Card in your Hand you may Special Summon it in face up DEF position, this card may attack whilst in Defense Position. If this card is Special Summoned it may attack your opponents Life points directly. [img]http://img822.imageshack.us/img822/807/303169f.jpg[/img] This card may attack your opponents Life points directly, as long as its ATK is 1500 or less. If there is another Monster card on your side of the field with “Deceiving Beauty” in its name then you can discard 2 cards from your hand, or the top of your Deck to switch this cards ATK with its DEF for the remaider of the duel. [img]http://img716.imageshack.us/img716/807/303169f.jpg[/img] If there is another card on your side of the field with “Deceiving Beauty” in its name, then all Monster Cards on your side of the field with “Deceiving Beauty” may not be destroyed by Trap or Spell cards. [img]http://img716.imageshack.us/img716/4540/303169y.jpg[/img] If their is another card you control with "Deceiving Beauty" in its name you can remove from play the top card of your Deck. If you do this this card can attack your opponents Life points directly, if you do this you must switch it to Defense Position for 2 turns. [img]http://img716.imageshack.us/img716/1451/303169x.jpg[/img] This card cannot be Special Summoned. This card may attack your opponents Life points directly. This card cannot be destroyed in battle (normal damage calculations apply). If this card is the only card you attack with during your Battle Phase it may attack twice. [img]http://img713.imageshack.us/img713/9065/303169.jpg[/img] This card cannot be Tribute Summoned unless you Tributre "Deceiving Beauty" cards. This card cannot be Special Summoned. If your opponents controls 2 or more monsters this card may attack your opponents Life points directly. [img]http://img171.imageshack.us/img171/967/303169hx.jpg[/img] This card cannot be targeted if their is another "Deceiving Beauty" card on your side of the field. This card may attack your opponents Life points if you discard 2 cards at the bottom of your Deck. [img]http://img716.imageshack.us/img716/3293/303169n.jpg[/img] This card cannot be normal summoned, This card can only be Special Summoned by discarding 4 cards with "Deceiving Beauty"in their name from your Hand. This card may attack your Life points directly. [img]http://img833.imageshack.us/img833/4143/303169s.jpg[/img] You can half this cards ATK until the end of your turn for it to gain the following effect, If their is another "Deceiving Beauty" on your side of the field this card may attack your opponents Life points directly, if you do this destroy one "Deceiving Beauty" monster you control (after applying damage). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mid-Knight Posted October 24, 2010 Report Share Posted October 24, 2010 on the card db Merma, I think the effect should be changed to; This Card cannot be destroyed by any Card with less then 2000 defense points as long as there is another Monster Card on your side of the field with “Deceiving Beauty”in its name. or reduce the level to a lv 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lewis atherton Posted October 24, 2010 Author Report Share Posted October 24, 2010 did you read the mermas attack is 2300 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lewis atherton Posted November 1, 2010 Author Report Share Posted November 1, 2010 bump Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lewis atherton Posted November 17, 2010 Author Report Share Posted November 17, 2010 just remade them please look the set is working now bump Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snowyash Posted November 17, 2010 Report Share Posted November 17, 2010 Let's look at them 1 at atime, shall we? [b]Bella[/b] Pointless on its own. No reason for it to be able to attack directly, it's too weak. [b]Maylin[/b] Weak, DEF isn't good enough. No need for it to attack directly. Its effect is worded wrong as well, look at Total Defense Shogun. [b]Kim-Tsu[/b] Milling effect could be OK, but the reason for it is pointless. 1400 ATK direct doesn't seem very useful. [b]Li -Ray[/b] Best one so far. Swarm and protect from Spell and Traps is best bet here. [b]Merma[/b] Too underpowered. Remove for 1 Direct attack and then get locked in DEF? No real use. [b]Nyaa[/b] Underpowered but with some use. Invincible to attacks and may have some use with Li -Ray. Until then, it's either 2200 damage and then pretty much out of the duel. [b]Rabetta[/b] Less underpowered than some others. Stats are more reasonable than Merma and Nyaa. [b]Onyx[/b] It's weak enough as-is. Why'd you decide on discarding as well? [b]Topaz[/b] Too awkward to summon unless you can fill your hand with your monsters. Which is near enough impossible if you insist on discarding from the Deck as a cost. [b]Crystal[/b] Effect is not any good. Just keep it as a beatstick. Maybe trap immunity instead. Overall, OCG isn't very good, pics aren't very convincing, names don't have any consistency. You've got a theme, but it's awful. It relies on having your cards on the field to attack directly, but the stats aren't worth it and you'll rarely have more than 1 on the field at a time. Only Li -Ray is any good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lewis atherton Posted November 17, 2010 Author Report Share Posted November 17, 2010 ok well thanks for your honest opinion imma wait for another person to comment and if they agree with you then i will re edit them thanks for being honest Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lewis atherton Posted November 18, 2010 Author Report Share Posted November 18, 2010 bump please comment and if you agree with skizo im willing to revise the set again Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.