Ярополк Пономарёв Posted October 30, 2010 Report Share Posted October 30, 2010 [img]http://img827.imageshack.us/img827/2710/215610.jpg[/img] This card cannot be Special Summoned. If there is no Field Spell Card, destroy this card. This card cannot be selected as an Attack Target. There can only be one face-up Earthbound Immortal on the field at a time. This card can Attack your opponent directly. You take no battle damage with battles that involve this card. Destroy any card that battles with this card at the end of the turn. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Renzoku Kira- Posted October 30, 2010 Report Share Posted October 30, 2010 To be honest I think its a little overpowered, but that just my thoughts on it. 5/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt O Posted October 30, 2010 Report Share Posted October 30, 2010 a bit over powered with the it can attack directly its hard enough to kill in the first place so that gives you pretty much three turns and youve won depending on opponents life points Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ярополк Пономарёв Posted November 3, 2010 Author Report Share Posted November 3, 2010 bump Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snowyash Posted November 3, 2010 Report Share Posted November 3, 2010 [quote name='Matt O' timestamp='1288473997' post='4750611'] a bit over powered with the it can attack directly its hard enough to kill in the first place so that gives you pretty much three turns and youve won depending on opponents life points [/quote] Technically, it's probably underpowered compared to the other Earthbound Immortal cards. I think, only you've added the Non-Special Summon stipulation to it (something the others don't have) making this even harder to summon, mainly cutting off Revival of the Immortals. Although, I like how you've added the possibily of destroying Stalls cause I imagine there's a couple of anti-Earthbound ones about. I think I'd prefer a Linewalker searcher effect instead though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
destruction duel Posted November 3, 2010 Report Share Posted November 3, 2010 That effect defeats all purpose, it can't be attacked anyway, it can attack directly, so why in the world would you destroy your opponents monsters? Couldn't just attack directly and be done with it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snowyash Posted November 3, 2010 Report Share Posted November 3, 2010 Not unless someone sets up a staunch defender on a 3000+ DEF monster or (one my brother likes) an exxod with ring of magnetism. So, a nice stall-breaker. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Time Psyduck Posted November 3, 2010 Report Share Posted November 3, 2010 It is underpowered in comparison to the other immortals, which can be Special Summoned, and it's unique effect is worse than the others so doesn't make up for it. The destruction effect seems most likely to be useful for getting through stuff that can't be destroyed by battle for other monsters to then attack, but it would be better if it happened after the battle, rather than at the end of the turn. Actually, looking at the card rather than the lore, there seem to be two more effects that aren't in the lore. The first, negating destruction by field spells, is useless, since I can't even think of a field spell that destroys monsters, but the second, preventing destruction by battle, means it could ram into 3000+ ATK monsters, survive, and then destroy the monster they just hit. In this case, it may be slightly OP'd, but it shouldn't be too bad since your opponent can't attack it and it's more than likely to ignore anything with less ATK than itself that might be boosted by a card effect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
destuctir Posted November 4, 2010 Report Share Posted November 4, 2010 it is slightly OP but i like this tipe of card Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ярополк Пономарёв Posted November 6, 2010 Author Report Share Posted November 6, 2010 [quote name='Time Psyduck' timestamp='1288786734' post='4758854'] The first, negating destruction by field spells, is useless I meant it cant be destroyed by its own effects Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~ Dākunaitomon ~ Posted November 6, 2010 Report Share Posted November 6, 2010 What exactly IS this a fish or what? 8/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.