Limited Edition KING Posted November 6, 2010 Report Share Posted November 6, 2010 [font="Verdana"][center][img]http://img257.imageshack.us/img257/838/82805.jpg[/img] 1 Dragon-Type Tuner + 2 or more non-Tuner monsters When this card is Synchro Summoned, inflict 400 damage to your opponent for each card in their hand. You can remove this card from play to destroy all cards on the field. I haven't made a card in awhile, I found a nice pic and decided to make a Synchro out of it.[/center][/font] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arcarus-Angel of Darkness Posted November 7, 2010 Report Share Posted November 7, 2010 [quote name='King.' timestamp='1289072086' post='4766409'] [font="Verdana"][center][img]http://img257.imageshack.us/img257/838/82805.jpg[/img] 1 Dragon Tuner + 2 or more non-tuner monsters When this card is Synchro Summoned successfully inflict damage to your opponents Life Points for each card in their hand x400. You can remove this card from play to destroy all cards on the field. I haven't made a card in awhile, I found a nice pic and decided to make a Synchro out of it.[/center][/font] [/quote] Maby make it 1 tuner instaed 2 so its easyer to summon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Limited Edition KING Posted November 7, 2010 Author Report Share Posted November 7, 2010 [quote name='libra-anubis' timestamp='1289091642' post='4767077'] Maby make it 1 tuner instaed 2 so its easyer to summon [/quote] No that makes the card overpowered. Having 2 non-tuners makes a harder summon that way it's balanced. Think about the effect it has a decent burn damage, and can blow up the field if I make it easy to summon then it's overpowered. It's incredibly easy to make a level 8 Synchro that has 1 tuner + 1 non tuner. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doom_Shaman Posted November 7, 2010 Report Share Posted November 7, 2010 agreed. 2 is good. id up the damage tho, to at least 500. right now its like a synchro version of des koala, combined with black rose dragon. 7/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Limited Edition KING Posted November 9, 2010 Author Report Share Posted November 9, 2010 BUMP. More comments please. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
♠>:Stick-Man:<♠ Posted November 9, 2010 Report Share Posted November 9, 2010 I like the picture added with the holo, creative, and the card itself is pretty good. But here's OCG correction to make it better OCG Fix: 1 Dragon-Type Tuner + 2 or more non-Tuner monsters When this card is Successfully Synchro Summoned, inflict 400 damage to your opponent for each card in his/her hand. You can remove this card from play to destroy all cards on the field. Thats about it, fix that and you get a 10' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Limited Edition KING Posted November 9, 2010 Author Report Share Posted November 9, 2010 [quote name='!.:The Rater:.!' timestamp='1289263384' post='4772864'] I like the picture added with the holo, creative, and the card itself is pretty good. But here's OCG correction to make it better OCG Fix: 1 Dragon-Type Tuner + 2 or more non-Tuner monsters When this card is Successfully Synchro Summoned, inflict 400 damage to your opponent for each card in his/her hand. You can remove this card from play to destroy all cards on the field. Thats about it, fix that and you get a 10' [/quote] Thanks for the better wording but it's actually still "their hand" anything that says "his/her" is "their". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sarius_of_Wind Posted November 9, 2010 Report Share Posted November 9, 2010 i likey Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
♠>:Stick-Man:<♠ Posted November 9, 2010 Report Share Posted November 9, 2010 [quote name='King.' timestamp='1289264087' post='4772914'] Thanks for the better wording but it's actually still "their hand" anything that says "his/her" is "their". [/quote] True and sorry for the mistake man, well i just tried helping, hope it helped. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
♥Łövëły-Ċħän♥ Posted November 9, 2010 Report Share Posted November 9, 2010 King's OCG was perfect to start. No changes were necessary. The effect is quite balanced and could easily be seen in those heavy Dragon Decks (of which I dont know the name of) that I see people using, you know the FGD decks. Not much else to say. Already noted on balance. Oh, it's got decent power, although the Dragon tuner makes it less likely to see outside of near Dragon Specific decks but all the same it's rather well done. ;3 I like. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Limited Edition KING Posted November 9, 2010 Author Report Share Posted November 9, 2010 [quote name='♥Łövëły Ċ.Ċ♥' timestamp='1289266243' post='4773097'] although the Dragon tuner makes it less likely to see outside of near Dragon Specific decks but all the same it's rather well done. [/quote] Debris decks say hi. Also I was expecting you to comment tomorrow, you know like you said you were going to. Thanks for the surprise comment anyway Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
♥Łövëły-Ċħän♥ Posted November 9, 2010 Report Share Posted November 9, 2010 Np :3 finished making din din early so I figured I'd drop on >> Also~ I thought of that but it's too specific. The Debris would be your only way of summoning it unless you also had a Dread Dragon in there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~ P O L A R I S ~ Posted November 9, 2010 Report Share Posted November 9, 2010 I don't think the balance here would be any more precarious if it were "1 Dragon-Type Tuner + 1 or more non-Tuner monsters" than what it currently is. Your current card seems rather underpowered. I'd agree with you if it were just "1 Tuner + 1 or more non-Tuner monsters", but having the Tuner need to be Dragon-Type is fair. You'd need 3 with Debris anyway, other Dragon-Type Tuners still don't get this out with much ease. All Dragon-Type Tuners thus far in the OCG and TCG would require either a Level 5+ non-Tuner, more than 2 monsters worth of material, or some form of Level modification to get this out. All real cards have Set IDs and 1st Edition's formatting via the card maker is flawed since it's block capitals when it shouldn't be. Try Limited Edition or blank. :3 Couldn't find any examples of "When this card is successfully Synchro Summoned" or "When this card is Synchro Summoned successfully". Black Rose Dragon, Hyunlei, Wayne, Junk Destroyer, and Silverwind are cited as "When this card is Synchro Summoned" which appears to be correct. The errata of Zaborg the Thunder Monarch serves as further indication of the elimination of "successfully" in at least the desired context. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Limited Edition KING Posted November 9, 2010 Author Report Share Posted November 9, 2010 [quote name='Petrosian' timestamp='1289268861' post='4773256'] I don't think the balance here would be any more precarious if it were "1 Dragon-Type Tuner + 1 or more non-Tuner monsters" than what it currently is. Your current card seems rather underpowered. I'd agree with you if it were just "1 Tuner + 1 or more non-Tuner monsters", but having the Tuner need to be Dragon-Type is fair. You'd need 3 with Debris anyway, other Dragon-Type Tuners still don't get this out with much ease. All Dragon-Type Tuners thus far in the OCG and TCG would require either a Level 5+ non-Tuner, more than 2 monsters worth of material, or some form of Level modification to get this out. [b] I made the requirements hard because of the effect, the synchro is basically a Black Rose with added burn damage, if I made the requirements Generic then the card would be overpowered, I had to put a drawback somewhere. [/b] All real cards have Set IDs and 1st Edition's formatting via the card maker is flawed since it's block capitals when it shouldn't be. Try Limited Edition or blank. :3 [b] I could care less about Set ID's etc. [/b] Couldn't find any examples of "When this card is successfully Synchro Summoned" or "When this card is Synchro Summoned successfully". Black Rose Dragon, Hyunlei, Wayne, Junk Destroyer, and Silverwind are cited as "When this card is Synchro Summoned" which appears to be correct. The errata of Zaborg the Thunder Monarch serves as further indication of the elimination of "successfully" in at least the desired context. [b] I made it so that if your opponent activates a Bottomless or Torrential then the effect doesn't happen. It just helps make it so the card isn't too broken.[/b] [/quote] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
angel killer315 Posted November 9, 2010 Report Share Posted November 9, 2010 wow another level 8 dragon synchro that is very original and an original 2800 atk as well plus almost the same effect as black rose dragon... coincidence i think not. 4/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Limited Edition KING Posted November 9, 2010 Author Report Share Posted November 9, 2010 [quote name='angel killer315' timestamp='1289271334' post='4773415'] wow another level 8 dragon synchro that is very original and an original 2800 atk as well plus almost the same effect as black rose dragon... coincidence i think not. 4/10 [/quote] If you're not going to give helpful advice along with criticism then please just leave. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
angel killer315 Posted November 9, 2010 Report Share Posted November 9, 2010 i'm just trying to say to be more original. sry if i came off really rude here is some pointers -the name is really close to red nova dragon -the effect is almost the same as black rose dragon except you have to remove this card from play. -it has a common atk -it has a common level -it would be hard to get out a level 8 with two non-tuners which is good though, but that means you can add more to his effect. hope that helps Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~ P O L A R I S ~ Posted November 9, 2010 Report Share Posted November 9, 2010 I didn't suggest making the Synchro requirements generic. I just said to keep them Dragon-Type, it would still be very difficult to Summon, always requiring either 3 monsters, a Level 5+ monster, or some form of Level modification. "Successfully" doesn't stop the effect from happening if the monster in question is BTH'd or TT'd, the only way to make a Summon "unsuccessful" is to negate it by means of Horn of Heaven, Solemn Judgment, etc. "Successfully" doesn't change whether or not one can claim priority. It's redundant which is why it's obsolete. Several Monarch erratas serve as evidence. I'll even throw in Nephythys for the hell of it. I'm sure there're plenty more examples out there too. http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Card_Errata:Mobius_the_Frost_Monarch http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Card_Errata:Thestalos_the_Firestorm_Monarch http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Card_Errata:Zaborg_the_Thunder_Monarch http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Card_Errata:Sacred_Phoenix_of_Nephthys Even if it weren't obsolete, it doesn't preceed the way in which it was Summoned. It was Summoned successfully, not successfully Summoned, and now it's obsolete. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Limited Edition KING Posted November 9, 2010 Author Report Share Posted November 9, 2010 [quote name='angel killer315' timestamp='1289272865' post='4773490'] i'm just trying to say to be more original. sry if i came off really rude here is some pointers -the name is really close to red nova dragon -the effect is almost the same as black rose dragon except you have to remove this card from play. -it has a common atk -it has a common level -it would be hard to get out a level 8 with two non-tuners which is good though, but that means you can add more to his effect. hope that helps [/quote] None of that helps, it's just stating the obvious. What would be helpful is offering advice so that I can make changes if I agree with you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
angel killer315 Posted November 9, 2010 Report Share Posted November 9, 2010 ok maybe just beef his effect up a little he takes 3 or more cards to summon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
♥Łövëły-Ċħän♥ Posted November 9, 2010 Report Share Posted November 9, 2010 [quote name='angel killer315' timestamp='1289272865' post='4773490'] i'm just trying to say to be more original. sry if i came off really rude here is some pointers -the name is really close to red nova dragon [b]Irrelevant to the card itself. This makes no difference what so ever[/b] -the effect is almost the same as black rose dragon except you have to remove this card from play. [b]Irrelevant to the card itself. This makes no difference what so ever[/b] -it has a common atk [b]Irrelevant to the card itself. This makes no difference what so ever[/b] -it has a common level [b]Irrelevant to the card itself. This makes no difference what so ever[/b] -it would be hard to get out a level 8 with two non-tuners which is good though, but that means you can add more to his effect. [b]Irrelevant to the card itself. This makes no difference what so ever. Also, it needing 2 non-Tuners has nothing to do with how much stronger you can make it.[/b] hope that helps [/quote] First perhaps it was coincidence that this was similar to BRD. To say otherwise in the fashion you did is rather rude and pretentious. You've no idea what was going through his head at the moment therefore you have no right to judge as such. Also it's flat out rude and unconstructive to give such a low rate just because of originality. Cards don't need to be 100% original. [Quote=Petrosian]"Successfully" doesn't stop the effect from happening if the monster in question is BTH'd or TT'd, the only way to make a Summon "unsuccessful" is to negate it by means of Horn of Heaven, Solemn Judgment, etc. "Successfully" change whether or not one can claim priority. It's redundant which is why it's obsolete. Several Monarch erratas serve as evidence. I'll even throw in Nephythys for the hell of it. I'm sure there're plenty more examples out there too.[/quote] I believe that's correct although honestly I feel iffy about it and am unsure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlackWindDragon Posted November 9, 2010 Report Share Posted November 9, 2010 honestly, i think you could find a better pic for it. As it is now, it looks like it should be a majestic synchro monster. the effect plus the pic make it basically, as im sure has already been said, a majestic black rose dragon fused with a fire monsters burn power. Seems like it should be named Majstic Roseflare Dragon. I think it should do more than burn and blow up, and that it should be at least a level 10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
♥Łövëły-Ċħän♥ Posted November 9, 2010 Report Share Posted November 9, 2010 [quote name='BlackWindDragon' timestamp='1289335954' post='4774261'] honestly, i think you could find a better pic for it. As it is now, it looks like it should be a majestic synchro monster. the effect plus the pic make it basically, as im sure has already been said, a majestic black rose dragon fused with a fire monsters burn power. Seems like it should be named Majstic Roseflare Dragon. I think it should do more than burn and blow up, and that it should be at least a level 10 [/quote] Why is it that people constantly rate on looks alone =/? Theres nothing constructive about this comment. Image doesnt matter (unless it OBVIOUSLY unrealistic). No, it is not relateable to Black Rose Dragon. There are plenty of nuke cards =/ are they related to BRD? No, also why would he make this a Majestic for BRD when it looks nothing like BRD? Plants have equally powerful burn as Fire =/. It's level is fine where it is. It's not powerful enough to warrant it a Level 10. Also -.- It should be comments not requests. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlackWindDragon Posted November 9, 2010 Report Share Posted November 9, 2010 [quote name='♥Łövëły Ċ.Ċ♥' timestamp='1289337206' post='4774301'] Why is it that people constantly rate on looks alone =/? Theres nothing constructive about this comment. Image doesnt matter (unless it OBVIOUSLY unrealistic). No, it is not relateable to Black Rose Dragon. There are plenty of nuke cards =/ are they related to BRD? No, also why would he make this a Majestic for BRD when it looks nothing like BRD? Plants have equally powerful burn as Fire =/. It's level is fine where it is. It's not powerful enough to warrant it a Level 10. Also -.- It should be comments not requests. [/quote] ok im just stating my opinion, thats what comments are. TO ME it looks like it would be more of a Majestic card. Im not saying theres anything wrong with the card itself, just stating what i either would have done it as or just what it reminds ME of. In all honesty, its a good ard I know its not powerful enough to warrent a level 10, but the fact i said i THINK it should do more than just burn and blow up is just my way of looking at it. i made no request, i simply made statements and i dont understand why you seem to take what people say personally when its not your work. comments are made to make people think and consider differences, and if you have a problem with that, well then thats on you, but i put my 2 cents in it, and even if you may not agree with what i think, well thats just your porogative Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
♥Łövëły-Ċħän♥ Posted November 9, 2010 Report Share Posted November 9, 2010 [quote name='BlackWindDragon' timestamp='1289338080' post='4774317'] ok im just stating my opinion, thats what comments are. TO ME it looks like it would be more of a Majestic card. Im not saying theres anything wrong with the card itself, just stating what i either would have done it as or just what it reminds ME of. In all honesty, its a good ard [b]Still =/ sounded more request based than opinion. But you wrote it therefore you know what you ment so I've no say on that. My misinterpretation.[/b] I know its not powerful enough to warrent a level 10, but the fact i said i THINK it should do more than just burn and blow up is just my way of looking at it. i made no request, i simply made statements and i dont understand why you seem to take what people say personally when its not your work. [b]I don't take what people say personally. I comment on their comments. Nothing more nothing less.[/b] comments are made to make people think and consider differences, and if you have a problem with that, well then thats on you, [b]I said nothing to the contrary. I said your comment was monconstructive meaning it gave no information relevant to the success of the card or cardmaker[/b] but i put my 2 cents in it, and even if you may not agree with what i think, well thats just your porogative [b]"But I put my 2 cents in" <- Snatch Steal. Also just some randomness~ It's spelled prerogative, not porogative[/b] [/quote] Also why suggest it be made LV 10 if that would UP it and make it less playable? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.