Squirrel Girl Posted November 9, 2010 Report Share Posted November 9, 2010 [center]Card: [img]http://img248.imageshack.us/img248/9488/133082p.jpg[/img] [quote]This card can attack your opponent directly. Once per turn, increase this cards ATK by 100. This card is unaffected by Trap Cards. When this cards ATK becomes 1300 or more, destroy this card. When this card is destroyed, destroy 2 Spell or Trap Cards your opponent controls.[/quote] That's all[/center] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1SDAN Posted November 9, 2010 Report Share Posted November 9, 2010 pretty good, 8/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Squirrel Girl Posted November 9, 2010 Author Report Share Posted November 9, 2010 Thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
starwebs1 Posted November 9, 2010 Report Share Posted November 9, 2010 This card can attack your opponent directly. Once per turn, increase this card[b]'[/b]s ATK by 100. This card is unaffected by Trap Cards. When this card[b]'[/b]s ATK becomes 1300 or more, destroy this card. When this card is destroyed, destroy 2 Spell or Trap Cards your opponent controls. Other than that, good card, 9/10. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
♥Łövëły-Ċħän♥ Posted November 9, 2010 Report Share Posted November 9, 2010 Flow seems really weird @.@ Just a suggestion~ but here's a version in which the flow sounds more natural. It also has a few more edits which I will explain. "This card can attack your opponent directly. Once per turn, this card [i]gains 100 ATK.[/i] When this cards ATK becomes 1300 [s]or more[/s], destroy this card. When this card is destroyed [b]by its own effect[/b], destroy 2 Spell or Trap Cards your opponent controls. This card is unaffected by Trap Cards." [code] Italicized = Flow fix Slash = Unnecessary Bold = Balance [/code] Now this version sounds more natural where as before it sounds almost random >> But this is just a suggestion ><! The slashed bit is unnecessary as since the destruction is manditory, it's ATK will never reach over 1300. The bold was added because with out it, this card can be destroyed by battle or the effect of other cards and it'll still gain it's effect of destroying 2 S/T which is rather OP for such a card. With low ATK and DEF is a good search making it slightly abusable. Anyways it a rather well card. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arcarus-Angel of Darkness Posted November 10, 2010 Report Share Posted November 10, 2010 Cool pic but change name to Faceless Fiend Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anbu-of-Sand Posted November 10, 2010 Report Share Posted November 10, 2010 [quote name='libra-anubis' timestamp='1289362172' post='4775116'] Cool pic but change name to Faceless Fiend [/quote] This post was unnecessary. It is the persons choice to choose what should be their card's name and whatnot. The post itself has nothing to do with the card's effect, just the image and name, which are to be honest, the least important part (in most situations) when it comes to card reviewing / rating. You might as well just have posted "+1 Post Count". I would neg you, [strike] but sadly, I have reached my 1 neg per day limit.[/strike] but since I'm a nice person, I'll let it go. [color=blue][b]Nameless Fiend[/b][/color] [b]OCG / Common Sense:[/b] OCG is flawless. No errors whatsoever. [b]Effect / Originality:[/b] (I am rating the original card, not Lovely's edit on it). The card can deal out some easy swings of 800 and more, seeing it increases it's ATK by a mere 100 overtime, which can really add up. At the end, it can destroy itself, triggering it's other effect of letting you destroy 2 Spell or Trap Cards your opponent controls, which is like activating 2 Mystical Space Typhoons at once. The card also is invulnerable to Traps, making cards like Mirror Force to be of no worries. Somewhat original, the concepts work quite well when put together. [b]Usefulness / Balance:[/b] The card even though useful, seems overpowering to me. Seeing it can trigger it's Spell / Trap Card destruction effect quite easily. I'd listen to Lovely and use her version of the card's effect, seeing even though not perfect, still usable, and more balanced as well. The card also although seems easy to splash in some Decks, actually doesn't. In my opinion that is, even though it can be beneficial. I can and cannot see this being used to be quite honest. [b]Ratings:[/b] OCG / Common Sense: 2/2 Effect / Originality: 3/4 Usefulness / Balance: 2.8/4 [b]Overall: 7.8/10[/b] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Squirrel Girl Posted November 10, 2010 Author Report Share Posted November 10, 2010 Thanks for comments. I will change the effect S/T destroying to the thing Lovely said. Cause I first intended it to be that way but I never did for some strange reason. And, I also think it is OPed. The name will not be changed. I didn't come up with a name and therefore it got the name "Nameless Fiend" which I like really much That was al for me this time Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.