Jump to content

Quick! How many Bars does your Battery have left?


Stratus G.

Recommended Posts

IRL BatteryObjects

[b]Read this before you post[/b]
If your going to post [b]just to say[/b] the deck is terrible and/or I'm doing it wrong. Do [b]NOT[/b] post.

Monsters-18
Batteryman Industrial Strength x1
Batteryman Fuel Cell x3
Batteryman Charger x3

Honest x2
Batteryman D x2
Batteryman Micro-Cell x3
Batteryman AA x3
Morphing Jar x1

Spells-12
Short Circuit x3
Inferno Reckless Summon x3
Battery Charger x2
Monster Reborn x1
Hand Destruction x1
Card Destruction x1
Giant Trunade x1

Traps-12
Reckless Greed x3
Call Of The Haunted x1
Portable Battery Pack x2
Ojama Trio x2
Trap Stun x2
Return from the Different Dimension x1
Gravity Bind x1

Notes: I do not own ANY Pot of Duality's. If your going to suggest them. Try to use a substitute card for them.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not bad, but it's not good either.

-2 Ojama Trio (I don't really see where this comes in)
-1 Return from the D.D. (Doesn't really work here)
-1 Gorz (I've played Batterymen for years; I do not recall any opportunity to use him. I usually have the OTK out in three to four turns or less)

+1 Guardian of Order (The Batterymen are all LIGHT)
+1 Super-Electromagnetic V. Dragon (3400 ATK beatstick)
+1 Makiu the Magical Mist (Thunder Support. You can use other cards too)
+1 Gravity Bind (I use this if I can't get my Inferno R. Summon, since Batteryman AA is Level 3)

That's just my suggestion. You don't have to follow it
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='SleepingKirby' timestamp='1290045552' post='4792500']
It's not bad, but it's not good either.

-2 Ojama Trio (I don't really see where this comes in)
-1 Return from the D.D. (Doesn't really work here)
-1 Gorz (I've played Batterymen for years; I do not recall any opportunity to use him. I usually have the OTK out in three to four turns or less)

+1 Guardian of Order (The Batterymen are all LIGHT)
+1 Super-Electromagnetic V. Dragon (3400 ATK beatstick)
+1 Makiu the Magical Mist (Thunder Support. You can use other cards too)
+1 Gravity Bind (I use this if I can't get my Inferno R. Summon, since Batteryman AA is Level 3)

That's just my suggestion. You don't have to follow it
[/quote]

[b]Ojama Trio[/b]
Chain OJ to Inferno Reckless Summon When I Sp.S. Batteryman AA
Select Ojama Token
Sp.S. the Batteryman AA while Opponent cannot Sp.S. anything With the Token
Short Circuit

[b]Return From D.D.[/b]
Batteryman Industrial Strength's Effect to remove BM AA either from Sp.Summon or using it's effect
Use Return From D.D.
Sp.Summon BM AA
Inferno Reckless on BM AA
Short Circuit
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Stratus G.' timestamp='1290048842' post='4792661']
[b]Ojama Trio[/b]
Chain OJ to Inferno Reckless Summon When I Sp.S. Batteryman AA
Select Ojama Token
Sp.S. the Batteryman AA while Opponent cannot Sp.S. anything With the Token
Short Circuit

[b]Return From D.D.[/b]
Batteryman Industrial Strength's Effect to remove BM AA either from Sp.Summon or using it's effect
Use Return From D.D.
Sp.Summon BM AA
Inferno Reckless on BM AA
Short Circuit
[/quote]
Interesting... although I personally wouldn't run Return from DD, since at times it could easily be a dead draw, seeing as Industrial is the only card that can remove.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='SleepingKirby' timestamp='1290080077' post='4793089']
Interesting... although I personally wouldn't run Return from DD, since at times it could easily be a dead draw, seeing as Industrial is the only card that can remove.
[/quote]

Return could also be used for when I Inferno Reckless.And my Opponent activates bottomless when the other 2 or 1 AA comes out.(2 AA's become 3000 as soon as they hit the field.,Opponent is able to activate Bottomless,They both get Removed from play since they were summoned at the same time.)

Example I gave happens [b]alot[/b] when I don't have Trap Stun or Giant Turnade
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Purple Whatevers' timestamp='1290390281' post='4802121']
Thunder Dragon.

Although, [b]there's a lot wrong with this[/b].
[/quote]

I doubt Such(Bolded)
I placed 1st twice at my locals yesterday and today.

[b]Up against [/b]
Blackwings [b]2/3[/b]
Blackwings Turbo [b]3/3[/b]
5 Different Glad decks [b]2/3 3/3 3/3 2/3 3/3[/b]
E.B.Blackwings [b]2/3[/b]
OTK Morphtronics [b]3/3[/b]
Gigavise [b]2/3[/b]
Tytanial Synchro [b]3/3[/b]
Jurrac's [b]2/3[/b]
GraveKeeper's (Malefic,Visionary,and Basic) [b]3/3 2/3 3/3[/b]
Solidarity Six Samurai [b]3/3[/b]
Basic Six Samurai [b]3/3[/b]
Hopeless Blue-Eyes [b]3/3[/b]
Hopeless-Vise [b]3/3[/b]
Morphing Jar-Mill [b]2/3[/b]
4 Different Scrap Decks [b]3/3 2/2 3/3 3/3[/b]

"Although, [b]there's a lot wrong with this[/b]." The deck is terrible even with those Results. Isn't it?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Purple Whatevers' timestamp='1290431366' post='4802802']
Topping locals means nothing. [b](Topping the WC10 Game means nothing.Highly Doubtful on Locals)[/b]

You have Gravity Bind [b](Explain)[/b]

No Recycling Batteries or Quick Charger (should be ran @3 :o) [b](What to Neg?)[/b]

M Jar :o [b](Explain)[/b]

D [b](No one has yet to Explain)[/b]

Only 1 Industrial Strength :o [b](2? Or 3.)[/b]

Hand and Card Destruction :o [b](Explain)[/b]

No Dark Hole [b](What to Neg?)
[/b]
Reckless Greed [b](Explain when I don't have Pot of Duality)[/b]

Only 2 Battery pack [b](Became Dead Draw at 3)
[/b]
make dese changes.

Oh and I think you're supposed to run 1 Makiu's Magical Mist or w/e [b](What to Neg?)[/b]
[/quote]

Thoughts are within Bolded.

[quote name='Draxon' timestamp='1290451190' post='4803195']
'ok after corrections but where's judgement and electromagnetic shield?
[/quote]
Already said Judgment Slowed the Deck down. and Why E.M.S.?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Purple Whatevers' timestamp='1290468777' post='4803947']
You neg what I said you neg, scrub.
[/quote]

An actual Scrub doesn't have thumbs.
I do.

Can you at least show a list of what to - and +
"You have Gravity Bind" doesn't tell me anything.
As it could be a positive comment or Negative Comment.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Stratus G.' timestamp='1290399820' post='4802441']
I doubt Such(Bolded)
I placed 1st twice at my locals yesterday and today.

[b]Up against [/b]
Blackwings [b]2/3[/b]
Blackwings Turbo [b]3/3[/b]
5 Different Glad decks [b]2/3 3/3 3/3 2/3 3/3[/b]
E.B.Blackwings [b]2/3[/b]
OTK Morphtronics [b]3/3[/b]
Gigavise [b]2/3[/b]
Tytanial Synchro [b]3/3[/b]
Jurrac's [b]2/3[/b]
GraveKeeper's (Malefic,Visionary,and Basic) [b]3/3 2/3 3/3[/b]
Solidarity Six Samurai [b]3/3[/b]
Basic Six Samurai [b]3/3[/b]
Hopeless Blue-Eyes [b]3/3[/b]
Hopeless-Vise [b]3/3[/b]
Morphing Jar-Mill [b]2/3[/b]
4 Different Scrap Decks [b]3/3 2/2 3/3 3/3[/b]

"Although, [b]there's a lot wrong with this[/b]." The deck is terrible even with those Results. Isn't it?
[/quote]
Oh look. Another sucky Locals.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Purple Whatevers' timestamp='1290473809' post='4804167']
Everything I mentioned that you have is what you should neg. :o
I don't see how that's too difficult.
I said the deck was bad, so why would I be commenting on good cards in the deck?
Don't try to be a smart ass with me.
[b]I'll out-argue you every time.[/b]
[/quote]

You never once said the deck was bad except for your last comment
Seriously Doubtful on the bolded.
I wasn't "Trying to be a Smart-Ass." Good to see how well some of your senses are.

Yet again "You have Gravity Bind" doesn't tell me to neg it.
I wouldn't know you meant it as a bad thing until you point out that it was.
"D","M Jar" and such doesn't tell me to neg or plus it.
A simple editing to say
-M jar
-D
+Indust Strength
[b]"I don't see how that's to difficult"[/b]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Stratus G.' timestamp='1290477737' post='4804362']
You never once said the deck was bad except for your last comment
Seriously Doubtful on the bolded.
I wasn't "Trying to be a Smart-Ass." Good to see how well some of your senses are.

Yet again "You have Gravity Bind" doesn't tell me to neg it.
I wouldn't know you meant it as a bad thing until you point out that it was.
"D","M Jar" and such doesn't tell me to neg or plus it.
A simple editing to say
-M jar
-D
+Indust Strength
[b]"I don't see how that's to difficult"[/b]
[/quote]
Wrong form of the word "too" which means you obviously aren't copy/pasting comments into your posts, which means you're an internet noob.

[quote name='Purple Whatevers' timestamp='1290171520' post='4795249']
Batteryman D is really bad.
[/quote]
^implies the taking out of D

[quote name='Purple Whatevers' timestamp='1290390281' post='4802121']
Although, there's a lot wrong with this.
[/quote]
^implies the deck is bad

[quote name='Purple Whatevers' timestamp='1290468777' post='4803947']
You neg what I said you neg, scrub.
[/quote]
^implies you're a bad player, which further implies that the deck is bad.

I think I did.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Purple Whatevers' timestamp='1290478362' post='4804384']
Wrong form of the word "too" which means you obviously aren't copy/pasting comments into your posts, which means you're an internet noob.


^implies the taking out of D


^implies the deck is bad


^implies you're a bad player, which further implies that the deck is bad.

I think I did.
[/quote]

Used "To" simply because "[b]Too[/b]" was incorrect.Glad you saw it.

"[b]Implies the deck is bad[/b]" Hardly.
"[b]Although, there's a lot wrong with this.[/b]"
[b]A lot[/b] wrong with this,Implies about 2/3 of the deck is bad,Not the entire deck itself.
Watch the meaning of your wording.

"[b]You neg what I said you neg, scrub.[/b]"
"[b]implies you're a bad player[/b]"
Jokingly implies that I'm a "Bad" player.
"[b]which further implies that the deck is bad[/b]"
Invalid towards what you meant to say.
A "Bad" player could make the greatest deck of said Meta-Game.
It all depends on what's available to them.And what they know.

Anyway. Back [b]on-topic.[/b] With the deck at hand. Or Leave.That goes for anyone else with negative comments.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Stratus G.' timestamp='1290485883' post='4804611']
Used "To" simply because "[b]Too[/b]" was incorrect.Glad you saw it.

"[b]Implies the deck is bad[/b]" Hardly.
"[b]Although, there's a lot wrong with this.[/b]"
[b]A lot[/b] wrong with this,Implies about 2/3 of the deck is bad,Not the entire deck itself.
Watch the meaning of your wording.

"[b]You neg what I said you neg, scrub.[/b]"
"[b]implies you're a bad player[/b]"
Jokingly implies that I'm a "Bad" player.
"[b]which further implies that the deck is bad[/b]"
Invalid towards what you meant to say.
A "Bad" player could make the greatest deck of said Meta-Game.
It all depends on what's available to them.And what they know.

Anyway. Back [b]on-topic.[/b] With the deck at hand. Or Leave.That goes for anyone else with negative comments.
[/quote]
Too is correct. :o lrn2grammer.

If 2/3 of the deck is bad and 1/3 is good, the entire deck will be bad because it's functioning while containing mostly bad cards. So it would suck. And therefore invalidates your argument. Watch the meaning of your watching the meaning of my wording.

It doesn't jokingly imply you're a bad player. It calls you scrub, which is a bad player. :o

It's not invalid towards what I meant to say. Bad players generally make bad decks, so calling you a bad player makes your deck bad.

First, "said Meta-Game" is only valid if I mentioned the meta, which I haven't in this entire topic. Second, while highly unlikely, it is actually possible for that to happen. However, you did not. Batterymen, even in the best deck that can be made with them, are terrible in comparison to the meta. Therefore your deck, which is worse, is even more terrible in comparison to the meta.


Why don't you run triple Industrial Strength?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Purple Whatevers' timestamp='1290549647' post='4805726']
Too is correct. :o lrn2grammer.

If 2/3 of the deck is bad and 1/3 is good, the entire deck will be bad because it's functioning while containing mostly bad cards. So it would suck. And therefore invalidates your argument. Watch the meaning of your watching the meaning of my wording.

It doesn't jokingly imply you're a bad player. It calls you scrub, which is a bad player. :o

It's not invalid towards what I meant to say. [b]Bad players generally make bad decks, so calling you a bad player makes your deck bad.[/b]

First, "said Meta-Game" is only valid if I mentioned the meta, which I haven't in this entire topic. Second, while highly unlikely, it is actually possible for that to happen. However, you did not. Batterymen, even in the best deck that can be made with them, are terrible in comparison to the meta. Therefore your deck, which is worse, is even more terrible in comparison to the meta.


Why don't you run triple Industrial Strength?
[/quote]
Ignoring unnecessary wall of text.(Thought I'm sigging the bolded.)

Find room for 2 more?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...