a card i made

[Six Samz 500]

[img]http://img593.imageshack.us/img593/8992/264680.jpg[/img]
just because i saw the picture

[Newfie Kuriboh Shark]

when i saw the title i already knew this would be bad.

-ocg errors
-oped
-no balance
-doesent fit

[Demon wolf]

I agree 4/10

[Newfie Kuriboh Shark]

name: 0/3
pic: 2/5
OCG: 2/5
does it fit: 0/7
creativity: 1/10
TOTAL: 5/30

[Ieyasu Tokugawa]

You might want to point out the OCG errors, because I don't see any.

And for OP'd, it'd a Plant-type Cyber Dragon that adds a field to your hand if destroyed by card effect. The only thing I can see this abused with is synchro spamming, which is already a problem with Cyber Dragon.

[Newfie Kuriboh Shark]

if your opponent controls a monster and you control no monsters is one. also he used a comma, people dont use those

[Ieyasu Tokugawa]

[spoiler=monster who's lore proves that his first sentence is correct]
[IMG]http://images1.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20070308231159/yugioh/images/a/a1/CyberDragonDP04-EN-R.jpg[/IMG]
[/spoiler]

As you see, his OCG is perfectly fine.

[Newfie Kuriboh Shark]

well the first part is not, but i ill admit i am wrong about the comma, havent seen those in a while.

[Ieyasu Tokugawa]

[quote name='newfie shark' timestamp='1291411239' post='4826563']
well the first part is not, but i ill admit i am wrong about the comma, havent seen those in a while.
[/quote]
What does that mean? His first sentence is the exact same as Cyber Dragon's word for word, letter for letter!

[Newfie Kuriboh Shark]

[quote name='Metagross386' timestamp='1291411654' post='4826580']
What does that mean? His first sentence is the exact same as Cyber Dragon's word for word, letter for letter!
[/quote]
missed that, but then this card is ununique

[snowyash]

[quote name='newfie shark' timestamp='1291404526' post='4826174']
when i saw the title i already knew this would be bad.

-ocg errors - [b]I can see one error. deck = Deck[/b]
-oped - [b]Yep. That's what makes it usable.[/b]
-no balance - [b]Good cards don't need balance. Although the Black Garden effect is selective enough to balance it.[/b]
-doesent fit - [b]Fits into basically any Black Garden/Plant Synchro you want it to.[/b][/quote]


Meta to the rescue anyway.

I like the card. Quite usable and as splashable as Cyber Dragon. Not the most original idea, but card is nice. 8/10

[Ieyasu Tokugawa]

[quote name='newfie shark' timestamp='1291411756' post='4826587']
missed that, but then this card is ununique
[/quote]
That, I cannot disagree with. The field seeker is somewhat original, now if only I actually know how to play Black Garden correctly

[DarkMugen]

"by a card effect you can add"

Shouldn't there be a comma there?

Like So

"by a card effect, you can add"


? ? ?

[Demon wolf]

No, there shouldn't be a comma there. Like he said before, commas aren't used anymore

[Ieyasu Tokugawa]

[quote name='Demon wolf' timestamp='1291420481' post='4826966']
No, there shouldn't be a comma there. Like he said before, commas aren't used anymore
[/quote]
That arguement was disproven with cyber dragon. If that's not enough for you, look at the first sentence in Black Rose Dragon's effect. I see a comma, not sure about you.

[Hizu X]

It isn't "horid"
but you have many errors.
I give a 4/10 but you can fix it I am sure

[Ieyasu Tokugawa]

[quote name='Hizu X' timestamp='1291444335' post='4827676']
It isn't "horid"
but you have many errors.
I give a 4/10 but you can fix it I am sure
[/quote]
Where are the errors! I have continuously disproving the errors people have found on this card, so if you found something the others haven't, please tell me.

[Zextra]

I don't understand why you guys are giving him bad ratings. I mean, seriously, 4/10 just for having "issues" that don't actually exist?

Alright, let me break this down a bit (thanks to metagross and Skizo for pointing out the positive things...)

I mean, it's a field searcher for Black Garden (which is one of my favorite Field Spells - mostly due to the strategy required to use it properly ), it's a plant itself (meaning it fits perfectly into Plant/Black Garden decks), and it's fairly easy to use. The effect, though it is a bit bland, is nevertheless effective. Therefore, I will rate this an 8/10

Also, to the rest of you who say "errors", please point them out. That is essentially spam, as you are not helping him at all. I don't like to be harsh, but "insults" that you can't back up aren't really my type of thing.

[Six Samz 500]

[quote name='newfie shark' timestamp='1291410395' post='4826533']
if your opponent controls a monster and you control no monsters is one. also he used a comma, people dont use those
[/quote]
WRONG that was a copy and paste

if you didnt notce 4/10 people it has 0 defence!!! i say book of moon!!!

so the only error i see is missing a comma. WOW\[sarcasim]

[Mugendramon]

Ah, good l' Cyber Dragon-ish cards. My favourites.

Black Garden Decks love this. And its OCG is perfectly fine, save for [b]D[/b]eck capitalization.

Stated before, it's bland; but that does not make it a bad card... in this case at least. You people who say this card has errors are either stubbornly annoying, or just won't deal with the fact that a Thread Title without capitals does not make a card bad.

Bakura, you might want a better name than Rose Girl. That's just my thought, though.

[Six Samz 500]

[quote name='BlindMonkey' timestamp='1291469895' post='4828049']
Ah, good l' Cyber Dragon-ish cards. My favourites.

Black Garden Decks love this. And its OCG is perfectly fine, save for [b]D[/b]eck capitalization.

Stated before, it's bland; but that does not make it a bad card... in this case at least. You people who say this card has errors are either stubbornly annoying, or just won't deal with the fact that a Thread Title without capitals does not make a card bad.

Bakura, you might want a better name than Rose Girl. That's just my thought, though.
[/quote]
k thanks

[quote name='Zextra' timestamp='1291445354' post='4827692']
I don't understand why you guys are giving him bad ratings. I mean, seriously, 4/10 just for having "issues" that don't actually exist?

Alright, let me break this down a bit (thanks to metagross and Skizo for pointing out the positive things...)

I mean, it's a field searcher for Black Garden (which is one of my favorite Field Spells - mostly due to the strategy required to use it properly ), it's a plant itself (meaning it fits perfectly into Plant/Black Garden decks), and it's fairly easy to use. The effect, though it is a bit bland, is nevertheless effective. Therefore, I will rate this an 8/10

Also, to the rest of you who say "errors", please point them out. That is essentially spam, as you are not helping him at all. I don't like to be harsh, but "insults" that you can't back up aren't really my type of thing.
[/quote]
Thanks, a least someone see's sense

[Six Samz 500]

so no one's anserwing back

[Six Samz 500]

bump

[Six Samz 500]

so no more comments