Dragon7OP Posted December 9, 2010 Report Share Posted December 9, 2010 These are some of the first cards i made for my second Booster Series-Chaotica Arising. I own no artwork. Credit to Jazin Kay [spoiler=Servants of the Fiend Lord][img]http://img63.imageshack.us/img63/357/322015e.jpg[/img][img]http://img375.imageshack.us/img375/9873/322015.jpg[/img][img]http://img560.imageshack.us/img560/7726/322015h.jpg[/img][/spoiler] [spoiler=Zorono][img]http://img715.imageshack.us/img715/126/322015v.jpg[/img] [/spoiler] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dragon7OP Posted December 9, 2010 Author Report Share Posted December 9, 2010 bump Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dragon7OP Posted December 16, 2010 Author Report Share Posted December 16, 2010 bump Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beefman Posted December 17, 2010 Report Share Posted December 17, 2010 I think they're really good Fiend support cards! I see nothing wrong with them, not OP or UP, OCG is perfect! I just think that the fiend lord is a bit weak... But if not for that, I would've given you an M Rating (check my sig) but instead I'm giving you a 3S. Good job, I hope you take my advice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heavens Guardian Posted December 17, 2010 Report Share Posted December 17, 2010 No difernce i can think Good Perfect Good Job 10/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
â™ >:Stick-Man:<â™ Posted December 17, 2010 Report Share Posted December 17, 2010 I like there short and simple effects. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dragon7OP Posted December 17, 2010 Author Report Share Posted December 17, 2010 Holy cow! I just looked at this again and saw that zorono, on my screen at least, has 300 ATK when he should have 3000! My bad! I'll fix that as soon as I get the chance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.:Black Rose:. Posted December 17, 2010 Report Share Posted December 17, 2010 [quote name='Dragon7OP' timestamp='1292546129' post='4858113'] Holy cow! I just looked at this again and saw that zorono, on my screen at least, has 300 ATK when he should have 3000! My bad! I'll fix that as soon as I get the chance. [/quote] 3000 ATK???? That would make it extremely OP! A 3000+ ATK monster that can't be destroyed by battle? Rethink that. Change the ATK to maybe 1600 or 2000, and maybe add a drawback. As it stands, your cards get a 8/10. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dragon7OP Posted December 17, 2010 Author Report Share Posted December 17, 2010 [quote name='MysteryBanjoMan' timestamp='1292546861' post='4858144'] 3000 ATK???? That would make it extremely OP! A 3000+ ATK monster that can't be destroyed by battle? Rethink that. Change the ATK to maybe 1600 or 2000, and maybe add a drawback. As it stands, your cards get a 8/10. [/quote] Maybe 2300? How's that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.:Black Rose:. Posted December 17, 2010 Report Share Posted December 17, 2010 [quote name='Dragon7OP' timestamp='1292547681' post='4858191'] Maybe 2300? How's that? [/quote] 2300 seems a little OP to me still... add a drawback. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dragon7OP Posted December 17, 2010 Author Report Share Posted December 17, 2010 [quote name='MysteryBanjoMan' timestamp='1292548042' post='4858217'] 2300 seems a little OP to me still... add a drawback. [/quote] 2000 ATK and DEF? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beefman Posted December 17, 2010 Report Share Posted December 17, 2010 [quote name='Dragon7OP' timestamp='1292548870' post='4858247'] 2000 ATK and DEF? [/quote] Don't listen to him. It's fine the way it is. BTW, my new rating is M! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dragon7OP Posted December 17, 2010 Author Report Share Posted December 17, 2010 [quote name='Sanphred' timestamp='1292549574' post='4858284'] Don't listen to him. It's fine the way it is. BTW, my new rating is M! [/quote] Thanks. But if you'll pardon me asking, what are the ATK and DEF that it is M under? 2000-2000? 3000-1600? 2300-1600? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.:Black Rose:. Posted December 17, 2010 Report Share Posted December 17, 2010 [quote name='Dragon7OP' timestamp='1292548870' post='4858247'] 2000 ATK and DEF? [/quote] Actually, you should keep the ATK as you originally intended, just maybe bump off the indestructibility effect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ieyasu Tokugawa Posted December 17, 2010 Report Share Posted December 17, 2010 [quote name='MysteryBanjoMan' timestamp='1292624121' post='4859825'] Actually, you should keep the ATK as you originally intended, just maybe bump off the indestructibility effect. [/quote] Immunity to battle destruction doesn't really matter if you have over 3000 ATK. It would probably get killed by a Spell or Trap, so it should probably be left as it is (with the 3000 ATK). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dragon7OP Posted December 17, 2010 Author Report Share Posted December 17, 2010 O.K. this will be the updated card. [img]http://img715.imageshack.us/img715/126/322015v.jpg[/img] I put the ATK at 2600 because it will have 2900 with it's effect anyways. The battle destruction clause is left just in case you [i]don't[/i] use the 3 servants of the fiend lord, he's still indestructable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beefman Posted December 17, 2010 Report Share Posted December 17, 2010 [quote name='Dragon7OP' timestamp='1292550559' post='4858338'] Thanks. But if you'll pardon me asking, what are the ATK and DEF that it is M under? 2000-2000? 3000-1600? 2300-1600? [/quote] M is for 2300. But 2600 is even better Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
â™ >:Stick-Man:<â™ Posted December 18, 2010 Report Share Posted December 18, 2010 The Fiend Lord monster is underpowered. The effect monsters are stronger than it, you need to change that. And funny thing is, the FIEND, i repeat FIEND Lord isn't even a Fiend-Type monster, I'd change that too. 6' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beefman Posted December 18, 2010 Report Share Posted December 18, 2010 [quote name='♣Master♣' timestamp='1292631653' post='4860137'] The Fiend Lord monster is underpowered. The effect monsters are stronger than it, you need to change that. And funny thing is, the FIEND, i repeat FIEND Lord isn't even a Fiend-Type monster, I'd change that too. 6' [/quote] Look at the new and improved one, like, 2 comments back. THAT one isn't OP'ed. And, @Dragon7OP, use the edit button at the bottom of your first post to change or add new cards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.:Black Rose:. Posted December 18, 2010 Report Share Posted December 18, 2010 [quote name='Dragon7OP' timestamp='1292625476' post='4859867'] O.K. this will be the updated card. [img]http://img715.imageshack.us/img715/126/322015v.jpg[/img] I put the ATK at 2600 because it will have 2900 with it's effect anyways. The battle destruction clause is left just in case you [i]don't[/i] use the 3 servants of the fiend lord, he's still indestructable. [/quote] True true. Much better actually IMO. 9.5/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
â™ >:Stick-Man:<â™ Posted December 18, 2010 Report Share Posted December 18, 2010 Okay, it's suppose to be on the first page of this thread, not in the comments. Anyways not quite an improvement, there are OCG errors and its still a Zombie-Type lol. 7' is better than 6. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dragon7OP Posted December 18, 2010 Author Report Share Posted December 18, 2010 There are 2 reasons it's not a fiend-type. First, Zombie trumphs Fiend in ungodly demons. Second, the indestructable clause was added purely due to it being a zombie, since zombies cannot be killed. Also original post modified. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
â™ >:Stick-Man:<â™ Posted December 18, 2010 Report Share Posted December 18, 2010 Your call, idc, I'm just saying. Btw, Zombies tend to have 0 or low DEF. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dragon7OP Posted December 18, 2010 Author Report Share Posted December 18, 2010 [quote name='♣Master♣' timestamp='1292632767' post='4860181'] Okay, it's suppose to be on the first page of this thread, not in the comments. Anyways not quite an improvement, there are OCG errors and its still a Zombie-Type lol. 7' is better than 6. [/quote] And what, praytell, are these errors? Truely, my good sir, what is the reason for such a statement, if you do not specify the reason? It is madness, I tell you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beefman Posted December 20, 2010 Report Share Posted December 20, 2010 [quote name='Dragon7OP' timestamp='1292637297' post='4860347'] And what, praytell, are these errors? Truely, my good sir, what is the reason for such a statement, if you do not specify the reason? It is madness, I tell you. [/quote] Madness? THIS...IS...SPARTA!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.