youri012 Posted December 9, 2010 Report Share Posted December 9, 2010 Here they are: [img]http://img574.imageshack.us/img574/7476/325347a.jpg[/img] [img]http://img560.imageshack.us/img560/4961/325347o.jpg[/img] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Venom Posted December 9, 2010 Report Share Posted December 9, 2010 One advice that I can give to you is try to find creative names that resemble the card's power, for example: your Attack Vampire could be named "Vampire of the Shredding Claw" or "Bloodlust Vampire". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nazryl Posted December 9, 2010 Report Share Posted December 9, 2010 I agree with Venom, the names do need changing as they seem very dull and mundane. Overall, the cards seem solid to me, you could even change the ATK and DEF respectively, to 1900 each to justify the two being level five. 6/10 but if the names change 8.5/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lewis atherton Posted December 9, 2010 Report Share Posted December 9, 2010 they are a little weak for level fives maybe you could do something about all the cards on your side of the field. Like a full team power-up type of thing. and a team defence type of thing just a suggestion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
youri012 Posted December 29, 2010 Author Report Share Posted December 29, 2010 This needs more comments, i think they're pretty good! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morpice Posted December 30, 2010 Report Share Posted December 30, 2010 They're good, their names could use some changes though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beefman Posted December 30, 2010 Report Share Posted December 30, 2010 [quote name='youri012' timestamp='1293646804' post='4893367'] This needs more comments, i think they're pretty good! [/quote] Well, of course, you made them.TO THE RATING! I give a 6.5/10 because they're UP (even some level 4's can defeat these), the names are bland, and the pictures don't look like much effort was spent looking for them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alvarosv Posted December 30, 2010 Report Share Posted December 30, 2010 Sorry mate, 4/10. Very unoriginal names, and they should both be 4 stars. I mean, many 4 star monsters are better than these two guys. Also, add a little something to their effects to make em more original. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.