♠>:Stick-Man:<♠ Posted December 22, 2010 Report Share Posted December 22, 2010 [center] [IMG]http://i55.tinypic.com/28i2ash.jpg[/IMG] [b]Lore:[/b] [i]When your opponent Summons a Dragon-Type monster, your can Tribute 1 "Medieval" monster you control to Special Summon this card from your hand in Attack Position. When this card attacks a Dragon-Type monster or is attacked by a Dragon-Type monster, destroy the Dragon-Type monster before Damage Calculation by this card's effect. This card is unaffected by Dragon-Type monster's effects.[/i] [/center] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Catman25 Posted December 22, 2010 Report Share Posted December 22, 2010 Yes, it's slightly overpowered, but pretty much only if you're facing a dude who runs dragons. Otherwise it an be quite underpowered. Nice concept though. ^__^ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gawd of Spell Posted December 22, 2010 Report Share Posted December 22, 2010 wow, I've been gone for 3 years and this is what you've stooped down to! Overpowered cards!!! What has happend to YCM lol jk nice card but o'ped you deserve a 7/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buttercup Posted December 22, 2010 Report Share Posted December 22, 2010 hilariously bad/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
♥Łövëły-Ċħän♥ Posted December 22, 2010 Report Share Posted December 22, 2010 First effect is Unplayable? There are no Medieval monsters in TCG/OCG and I haven't seen any around here....So Unplayable effect. As to the rest...Not OP? UP. AoJ are bad (except the Synchros) because they're to Type specific. So is this. I mean it's Side Deckable since near everyone runs Stardust, others. It's just AoJ only Dragon Specific. Nothing about it is OP =/. I'm just not sure I'd want to have to waste a Tribute to summon it =/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lexadin Posted December 22, 2010 Report Share Posted December 22, 2010 Pic is, well I don't like it, but I gues its ok. OCG looks fine. I agree with Lovely CC on this, without more "Medieval" monsters it's really situational. Perhaps good with DNA cards, but otherwise way too UP. A 7/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.:Blu:. Posted December 22, 2010 Report Share Posted December 22, 2010 Well first-off, I would think this is a part of an Archetype you made up so I won't say anything about the first effect being "unplayable". Well, the effect could be playable if there were more "Medieval" monsters. Well, I can definately say that this card (along with any other cards in the archetype) would whoop Dragon-Type ass But if it doesn't go up against a Dragon-Type, well, at least it would make a great vanilla with 1900 ATK, oh, but then you'll have to Tribute Summon Anyways, this card is pretty situational, if you're going against a Dragon Deck then you're lucky, but if you go against a different deck, well, you're gonna need luck. So let's say you are going against a Dragon Deck, if your opponent couldn't counter then this card would whoop on any Dragon-Type monster which makes it a bit Op'd, but since this situation is pretty rare, then this card is indeed Up'd 5/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
♥Łövëły-Ċħän♥ Posted December 22, 2010 Report Share Posted December 22, 2010 That's why I said it could be side decked. And It's unplayable effect is unplayable because until theres actually more cards placed here, you cant special summon this card through it's effect unless you release another one of these which makes no sense =/. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.:Blu:. Posted December 22, 2010 Report Share Posted December 22, 2010 lol, I just realized that is basically Tribute Summoning Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
♥Łövëły-Ċħän♥ Posted December 22, 2010 Report Share Posted December 22, 2010 Yea >> Only on your opponent's turn Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.:Blu:. Posted December 22, 2010 Report Share Posted December 22, 2010 Yeah, but I agree, it would have its uses if you placed it in the side deck Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gawd of Spell Posted December 22, 2010 Report Share Posted December 22, 2010 you say it's unplayable well if he makes more medieval monsters than it will be playable o'ped because most ppl these days (n00bs) use dragons so its not u'ped and that is why it is rated 7/10 and now I'm going to watch Tom&Jerry Quack Quack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
♥Łövëły-Ċħän♥ Posted December 22, 2010 Report Share Posted December 22, 2010 [quote name='Scorpion the Darksigner' timestamp='1293044280' post='4874160'] you say it's unplayable [b]No. I said it's first effect is unplayable. Not the whole thing =/[/b] well if he makes more medieval monsters than it will be playable [b]Thats whay I said =/[/b] o'ped because most ppl these days (n00bs) [b]Lol what? How does using a Dragon card make you a noob? You've just called more than 97% of the entire Yu-Gi-Oh population a noob which makes you more "noobish" than them =/[/b] use dragons so its not u'ped and that is why it is rated 7/10 [b]No. It's UP. Read the other posts. Just because people use Dragons does not make it OP. People use LIGHT monsters, are AoJ OP?[/b][/quote] >> It's UP because it requires a Tribute to summon which makes it wasteful. It's Dragon Specific. Catastor is infinitly better because it has this card's second effect only it destroys all [b]except[/b] DARKs. It's not Specific. As for it's last effect...WTF? Theres monsters that are unaffected by Trap Cards =/. This card wastes Tributes, can easily be destroyed by battle, D-Prison, Bottomless, Sakuretsu, etc. Smashing, Hammer, etc. It's good tech against SDD and phenominal defense against Black Rose Dragon, but being Dragon specific makes it only side deck. Space waster in Main Deck. Saying this is OP is saying Catastor should be banned. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buttercup Posted December 22, 2010 Report Share Posted December 22, 2010 brio is sea serpent I have no idea why you're saying that this could be sided against dragons in any shape or form when Victoria exists as a better option x five billion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
♥Łövëły-Ċħän♥ Posted December 22, 2010 Report Share Posted December 22, 2010 Oh shwack~ Never noticed it was Sea-Serpent. I thought it was Dragon? (No not because of the name =/) Must be forgetting how to read. Not that it makes a difference. Good def against BRD's nuke =/. I'm saying it's side deck because it's side deck. That's why. I've already given reasons. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buttercup Posted December 22, 2010 Report Share Posted December 22, 2010 yes your argument is that since extra veiler stops effect damage it can be played in the side deck against frog ftk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
♥Łövëły-Ċħän♥ Posted December 22, 2010 Report Share Posted December 22, 2010 No. That's not at all my arguement since I've no idea what the frog FTK is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buttercup Posted December 22, 2010 Report Share Posted December 22, 2010 http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Frog_Burn_FTK MDS would be just barely sideable in Frognarchs over Victoria/ Crow/ Veiler, to be nice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
♥Łövëły-Ċħän♥ Posted December 22, 2010 Report Share Posted December 22, 2010 Just realized. You're pretty much right, but I'd still side deck it if I didnt have Victoria if anything, it'd be for it's last effect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.