burnpsy Posted January 19, 2011 Report Share Posted January 19, 2011 [center][img]http://images3.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20090715023342/yugioh/images/thumb/3/32/MorphtronicForcefieldCRMS-EN-C-1E.png/281px-MorphtronicForcefieldCRMS-EN-C-1E.png[/img] [quote name='Ｄ・バリア']Jibun fīrudo-jō ni omotegawa hyōji de sonzai suru `D (difōmā)' to na no tsuita monsutā o hakai suru mahō wana kādo no hatsudō o mukō ni shi hakai suru. Sarani jibun no dekki kara `D (difōmā)' to na no tsuita kādo 1-mai o tefuda ni kuwaeru.[/quote] [quote name='Rulings'][list][*]You can chain "Morphtronic Forcefield" to effects that do not target like "Dark Hole". [*]You cannot chain "Morphtronic Forcefield" to effects that are uncertain to destroy a "Morphtronic" monster like "Fissure" or "Smashing Ground", even if the only monsters you control are Morphtronic monsters. [*]If you don't have any Morphtronic monsters in your Deck, you cannot activate "Morphtronic Forcefield". [*]You can only chain "Morphtronic Forcefield" to a card that destroys a Morphtronic monster at resolution, not to a card that will destroy one in the future. So you cannot chain it to "Ekibyo Drakmord", "Blind Destruction", or "Needle Wall". [*]You cannot activate "Morphtronic Forcefield" if "Thunder King Rai-Oh" is on the field. If an effect is chained to "Morphtronic Forcefield" that Summons "Thunder King Rai-Oh", you will not be able to add a Morphtronic monster to your hand, but "Morphtronic Forcefield" can still negate the Spell or Trap Card this card was chained to.[/list][/quote][/center] The use of this thing has always been wholly dependent on whether or not spells/traps were being commonly used to destroy monsters. So I must ask: Do you think that spells and traps that destroy monsters are used often enough for this card to not be a dead draw? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheTurtleOnceCalledGod Posted January 19, 2011 Report Share Posted January 19, 2011 If it were "monster/s" it would be more playable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canadian Posted January 19, 2011 Report Share Posted January 19, 2011 It's situational and therefore is bad. Morph's can do just fine without the search. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brandon Michael Geren Posted January 19, 2011 Report Share Posted January 19, 2011 [quote name='Canadian' timestamp='1295403521' post='4943955'] It's situational and therefore is bad. [/quote] Stardust Dragon is about the same, just not archetype-specific. And you can use it on an MST, but nobody does that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darkwolf777 Posted January 19, 2011 Report Share Posted January 19, 2011 [quote name='TheTurtleOnceCalledGod' timestamp='1295403112' post='4943934'] If it were "monster/s" it would be more playable. [/quote] Destroying multiple "Morphtronic" monsters is still destroying a "Morphtronic" monster. The (s) is not required. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wiithepeople Posted January 19, 2011 Report Share Posted January 19, 2011 Accelerator is better Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
burnpsy Posted January 19, 2011 Author Report Share Posted January 19, 2011 [quote name='wiithepeople' timestamp='1295414300' post='4944293'] Accelerator is better [/quote] Aside from being Morph support, how are the 2 related? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EHN. Posted January 19, 2011 Report Share Posted January 19, 2011 If only it was just 'target'. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
burnpsy Posted January 19, 2011 Author Report Share Posted January 19, 2011 [quote name='Evil Hero Neos' timestamp='1295464856' post='4944910'] If only it was just 'target'. [/quote] If that was the case, you'd trade off the ability to block stuff like Dark Hole and TT... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darkwolf777 Posted January 19, 2011 Report Share Posted January 19, 2011 [quote name='burnpsy' timestamp='1295465059' post='4944916'] If that was the case, you'd trade off the ability to block stuff like Dark Hole and TT... [/quote] Unless he meant "targets" instead of "destroys", not "targets and destroys". Then that would be a trade off, by negating wide area destructions vs spell effects that target and don't destroy like Book of Moon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wiithepeople Posted January 19, 2011 Report Share Posted January 19, 2011 [quote name='burnpsy' timestamp='1295417067' post='4944326'] Aside from being Morph support, how are the 2 related? [/quote] They're both Morph support! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RAEGING D0GKING Posted January 19, 2011 Report Share Posted January 19, 2011 [quote name='wiithepeople' timestamp='1295470938' post='4945065'] They're both Morph support! [/quote] How the f*** does Morp Accel negate? You are basicly saying only use faultrol in an x-saber deck because its the best x-saber so dont use the other x-saber cards Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.