DARK RIDER99 Posted March 5, 2011 Report Share Posted March 5, 2011 Hello all this is my first card its called Inpenetrable Knight here is the card: [img]http://img824.imageshack.us/img824/5561/363135.jpg[/img] Please reply if you like it and if there are any OCG errors. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DARK RIDER99 Posted March 5, 2011 Author Report Share Posted March 5, 2011 BUMP Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
·Toot Posted March 5, 2011 Report Share Posted March 5, 2011 Applies should be applied. this card is okay kinda bland but eh... it would be better if it had another effect and a lot of cards don't have the same ATK and DEF, but eh... this is a place where we make them our way pic Is kinda bad and im not sure, but if it is from a game it should be in the pop culture section i rate with a 7/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RBY Posted March 5, 2011 Report Share Posted March 5, 2011 I'd give this 6/10. Nothing really wrong with it, but nothing particularly eye-catching about it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skythief Posted March 5, 2011 Report Share Posted March 5, 2011 Fine card but not very original. Applies should be is applied, I think. Pic is compressed, that doesn't look very good. I'm not asking of anyone to edit pics till they drop in perfectly, and if you don't want to download programs, you don't have to, but even paint suffices to crop a pic into the format of roughly a square. Also, this is an absolutely minor detail, but the card copyright in the lower right corner says c 2011 Konami. It's not Konami's card, it's yours. And if you want it to be realistic, it should be 1996 Kazuki Takahashi (Kazuki Takahashi is the inventor of yugioh, and 1996 is the invention year) I mainly saw this because the effect isn't that original. If there isn't much in the effect, people take a closer looks at the card, and probably point out more details, just because they want to say more than 2 words. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DARK RIDER99 Posted March 5, 2011 Author Report Share Posted March 5, 2011 [quote name='Skythief' timestamp='1299336530' post='5052428'] Fine card but not very original. Applies should be is applied, I think. Pic is compressed, that doesn't look very good. I'm not asking of anyone to edit pics till they drop in perfectly, and if you don't want to download programs, you don't have to, but even paint suffices to crop a pic into the format of roughly a square. Also, this is an absolutely minor detail, but the card copyright in the lower right corner says c 2011 Konami. It's not Konami's card, it's yours. And if you want it to be realistic, it should be 1996 Kazuki Takahashi (Kazuki Takahashi is the inventor of yugioh, and 1996 is the invention year) I mainly saw this because the effect isn't that original. If there isn't much in the effect, people take a closer looks at the card, and probably point out more details, just because they want to say more than 2 words. [/quote] Does this look better? [img]http://img824.imageshack.us/img824/5561/363135.jpg[/img] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RBY Posted March 5, 2011 Report Share Posted March 5, 2011 The image is much better now, but you should correct this in the lore: "damage calculation is applied normally" instead of "damage calculation applied normally." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DARK RIDER99 Posted March 5, 2011 Author Report Share Posted March 5, 2011 [quote name='RBY' timestamp='1299351516' post='5052924'] The image is much better now, but you should correct this in the lore: "damage calculation is applied normally" instead of "damage calculation applied normally." [/quote] OK thanks for the tip.OK finished [img]http://img824.imageshack.us/img824/5561/363135.jpg[/img] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DARK RIDER99 Posted March 5, 2011 Author Report Share Posted March 5, 2011 BUMP Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skythief Posted March 5, 2011 Report Share Posted March 5, 2011 You're not allowed to bump like that. You may only bump every 12 hours I think. Or 24 maybe. The pic is much better and grammar seems to be correct too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DARK RIDER99 Posted March 5, 2011 Author Report Share Posted March 5, 2011 [quote name='Skythief' timestamp='1299361805' post='5053357'] You're not allowed to bump like that. You may only bump every 12 hours I think. Or 24 maybe. The pic is much better and grammar seems to be correct too. [/quote] Oh woops sorry didnt know that thanks for the comment though! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AsterikcAde Posted March 6, 2011 Report Share Posted March 6, 2011 Hey! I used the same image for one of my cards in my Armored Avenger set! The effect seems too generic, and since it's a strong bodied monster card, you should give an summoning condition and the balance is way off, a level 7 2500 ATK and DEF monster? That is way off the power curve, at least make him an eight star with additional effects then it will be okay. 7/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DARK RIDER99 Posted March 6, 2011 Author Report Share Posted March 6, 2011 [quote name='AsterikcAde' timestamp='1299371623' post='5053691'] Hey! I used the same image for one of my cards in my Armored Avenger set! The effect seems too generic, and since it's a strong bodied monster card, you should give an summoning condition and the balance is way off, a level 7 2500 ATK and DEF monster? That is way off the power curve, at least make him an eight star with additional effects then it will be okay. 7/10 [/quote] Thanks for your opinion! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.