AsterikcAde Posted March 6, 2011 Report Share Posted March 6, 2011 [img]http://img814.imageshack.us/img814/4017/70725n.jpg[/img] [b]Rate.Discuss.Berate.Whatever.[/b] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MibeR Posted March 6, 2011 Report Share Posted March 6, 2011 it will be great if that card equipped to an opponent's monster,, OCG fix: Equip only to an Effect Monster on the[b] f[/b]ield. ...loses its effect and [b]it[/b] is treated as an Normal Monster [b]while on the field[/b] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AsterikcAde Posted March 6, 2011 Author Report Share Posted March 6, 2011 [quote name='Maha Guns' timestamp='1299375309' post='5053917'] it will be great if that card equipped to an opponent's monster,, OCG fix: Equip only to an Effect Monster on the[b] f[/b]ield. ...loses its effect and [b]it[/b] is treated as an Normal Monster [b]while on the field[/b] [/quote] The effect says Equip to an Effect monster on the Field, so it could be any monster on the Field, I didn't specify which side of the field you can equip the card to, but I will fix it... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MibeR Posted March 6, 2011 Report Share Posted March 6, 2011 i mean if it is equipped to an opponent's monster, that could be some strategic effect card.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Munky_Cheez! Posted March 6, 2011 Report Share Posted March 6, 2011 i dont understand the reason for only being able to be destroyed by a continuous trap card. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AsterikcAde Posted March 6, 2011 Author Report Share Posted March 6, 2011 [quote name='Munky_Cheez!' timestamp='1299376336' post='5053974'] i dont understand the reason for only being able to be destroyed by a continuous trap card. [/quote] I tried to make it an almost indestructible equip card. But it still goes into the graveyard if the monster that is equipped with Render Powerless is destroyed, so there's actually two ways for it to be destroyed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thekazu4u Posted March 6, 2011 Report Share Posted March 6, 2011 Equip cards need to be more powerful, so I like it. I especially like the picture. Although, why not just SMASHING GROUND? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AsterikcAde Posted March 6, 2011 Author Report Share Posted March 6, 2011 [quote name='thekazu4u' timestamp='1299380939' post='5054154'] Equip cards need to be more powerful, so I like it. I especially like the picture. Although, why not just SMASHING GROUND? [/quote] Thanx, but can you elaborate the Smashing Ground part? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thekazu4u Posted March 6, 2011 Report Share Posted March 6, 2011 Instead of negating effect, why not just destroy the monster? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AsterikcAde Posted March 6, 2011 Author Report Share Posted March 6, 2011 [quote name='thekazu4u' timestamp='1299382718' post='5054234'] Instead of negating effect, why not just destroy the monster? [/quote] I thought you mean that, yeah using Smashing Ground is also a loophole for Render Powerless. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thekazu4u Posted March 6, 2011 Report Share Posted March 6, 2011 Yea there is that too. Smashing Ground will destroy the monster Render Powerless is equipped to, which will destroy Render Powerless (lol pretty darn obvious, not exactly a loop hole) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AsterikcAde Posted March 6, 2011 Author Report Share Posted March 6, 2011 [quote name='thekazu4u' timestamp='1299387400' post='5054463'] Yea there is that too. Smashing Ground will destroy the monster Render Powerless is equipped to, which will destroy Render Powerless (lol pretty darn obvious, not exactly a loop hole) [/quote] LOL...yeah... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.