AsterikcAde Posted March 8, 2011 Report Share Posted March 8, 2011 [i]This is sort of a repost, two years ago I made a thread that showcases my effect versions of the popular Yu Gi Oh Normal Monsters and I decided to clean up the effect of the Blue Eyes one that I did and repost it here in realistic and I also changed the image and found a better one, I might repost the other ones later on, but enjoy the most popular vanilla revamped into an effect monster![/i] [img]http://img713.imageshack.us/img713/1126/70725.jpg[/img] [spoiler=Card's Lore]If you declare an attack with this card and it destroys one of your Opponent's monsters, you may select another card on the Field and destroy it. (If it's a monster, don't apply damage calculation.) If you control a face up "Kaibaman" or a face up "Blue Eyes White Dragon" on your side of the Field while this card is face up, at your End Phase, you may Special Summon a Normal Monster whose name is "Blue Eyes White Dragon" from you Hand or Deck onto the Field in face up ATK position.[/spoiler] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phantom-Duelist Posted March 8, 2011 Report Share Posted March 8, 2011 Doesn't make sence 1/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AsterikcAde Posted March 8, 2011 Author Report Share Posted March 8, 2011 [quote name='Phantom-Duelist' timestamp='1299620775' post='5060973'] Doesn't make sence 1/10 [/quote] Which part doesn't make sense to you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RBY Posted March 8, 2011 Report Share Posted March 8, 2011 It looks nice and the effects don't make it seem too overpowered. Afterall, in order to summon a Normal Blue Eyes you need Kaibaman on the field. As for its destruction effect, I might be wrong, but it seems like a reference to Burst Stream of Destruction it also seems pretty balanced since destroying a monster means sacrificing battle damage. All in all, it seems pretty good 9/10. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AsterikcAde Posted March 8, 2011 Author Report Share Posted March 8, 2011 [quote name='RBY' timestamp='1299621952' post='5061052'] It looks nice and the effects don't make it seem too overpowered. Afterall, in order to summon a Normal Blue Eyes you need Kaibaman on the field. As for its destruction effect, I might be wrong, but it seems like a reference to Burst Stream of Destruction it also seems pretty balanced since destroying a monster means sacrificing battle damage. All in all, it seems pretty good 9/10. [/quote] Now that's what I call a constructive comment! Thanx! I might post my Effect version of Dark Magician later...we'll see! +1 Rep for ya! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ярополк Пономарёв Posted March 8, 2011 Report Share Posted March 8, 2011 [quote][b]When[/b][font=tahoma, arial, verdana, sans-serif] you declare an attack with this card and it destroys one of your opponent's monsters, you [b]can[/b] select another card on the Field and destroy it. If you control a[b]nother[/b] face[b]-[/b]up "Kaibaman" or "Blue Eyes White Dragon" on your side of the Field, during your End Phase, you [b]can[/b] Special Summon a "Blue-Eyes White Dragon" from your Hand or Deck onto the Field in face[b]-[/b]up [b]attack[/b] position.[/quote][/font] [font=tahoma, arial, verdana, sans-serif] [/font] [font=tahoma, arial, verdana, sans-serif]Other than that, good card, but lower the attack.[/font] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AsterikcAde Posted March 8, 2011 Author Report Share Posted March 8, 2011 [quote name='Anger Level' timestamp='1299622276' post='5061077'] [/font] [font=tahoma, arial, verdana, sans-serif] [/font] [font=tahoma, arial, verdana, sans-serif]Other than that, good card, but lower the attack.[/font] [/quote] Why change the ATK? This is Blue Eyes after all and this is an effect remake of it and I decided to leave it's original ATK and DEF as it is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.