thekazu4u Posted March 13, 2011 Report Share Posted March 13, 2011 [img]http://img9.imageshack.us/img9/3038/358064.jpg[/img] This card cannot be destroyed by battle. (Battle Damage is calculated normally.) When there is a chain of 3 or more cards, you can negate the effects of all cards in the chain and place a number of Spell Counters on a card(s) on the field equal to the number of links in the chain you negated. If there are no Spell Counters on the field, destroy this card. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EndlessOcean Posted March 13, 2011 Report Share Posted March 13, 2011 Immpossible to summon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
:bcoe Posted March 13, 2011 Report Share Posted March 13, 2011 [quote name='Psychic Almighty' timestamp='1300051856' post='5071943'] Immpossible to summon. [/quote] This would be pretty easy to summon in a Spellcasters Command Deck w/Mag Citadel or even Mag Exemplar, defender etc. I think this card is really well balanced and supports the Deck very well since field control is paramount. Its almost a solemn judgement but it costs you up to 3 cards. Most likely 2 since while its face-up your opponent will know not to chain 2 of their own cards. You could do some serious damage if you combo'ed this with Arcanite. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thekazu4u Posted March 14, 2011 Author Report Share Posted March 14, 2011 Yes, I really like Spellcaster Burn deck it is all funky and stuff. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smesh Posted March 14, 2011 Report Share Posted March 14, 2011 Wouldn't be used. Much too slow, and it's easier to get Counters with other cards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thekazu4u Posted March 14, 2011 Author Report Share Posted March 14, 2011 Why won't it be used in a Spell Counter deck? Perhaps it needs an effect of removing Spell COunters from it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
:bcoe Posted March 14, 2011 Report Share Posted March 14, 2011 [quote name='thekazu4u' timestamp='1300073714' post='5072708'] Why won't it be used in a Spell Counter deck? Perhaps it needs an effect of removing Spell COunters from it? [/quote] no don't give it anything else, its balanced the way it is. This card would be really useful Spell counter decks. If you combined this with defender, you would have a pretty solid lockdown. People seem to forget this almost doubles as a solemn judgement as well as a spell counter provider. I would maybe make it negate [u]and destroy[/u] since your opponent should know better not to chain 2 of their own cards and while its just negate, you could abuse it with a trigger effect monster. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thekazu4u Posted March 14, 2011 Author Report Share Posted March 14, 2011 lol the fun thing is to abuse it with a trigger effect monster Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thekazu4u Posted March 18, 2011 Author Report Share Posted March 18, 2011 ~BUMP~ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thekazu4u Posted March 20, 2011 Author Report Share Posted March 20, 2011 ~BUMP~ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.