D.A._Sakuyamon Posted May 11, 2011 Report Share Posted May 11, 2011 [img]http://img121.imageshack.us/img121/613/101278.jpg[/img][b][size="4"][color="#2e8b57"][spoiler=Effect]The Monster Card Zone that this card is on counts as empty until 1 non "Landmass" monster is placed on it. This monster cannot attack if there is another monster on this Monster Card Zone. When a monster is placed on this Monster Card Zone, increase the DEF of that monster equal to half of this monsters DEF. (There can only be 2 "Landmass" monsters on 1 Monster Card Zone at a time.)[/color][/size][/b][/spoiler] [img]http://img848.imageshack.us/img848/2462/101278l.jpg[/img][spoiler=effect][b][size="4"][color="#2e8b57"]The Monster Card Zone that this card is on counts as empty until 1 non "Landmass" monster is placed on it. This monster cannot attack if there is another monster on this Monster Card Zone. While this card is face-up on the field your opponent can only declare attacks to a monster on this Monster Card Zone. This monster destroys any monster it battles with. (There can only be 2 "Landmass" monsters on 1 Monster Card Zone at a time.)[/color][/size][/b][/spoiler] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MibeR Posted May 11, 2011 Report Share Posted May 11, 2011 why DEF and not ATK? ATK would be more useful. Nice idea btw. Raise the ATK of course Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D.A._Sakuyamon Posted May 11, 2011 Author Report Share Posted May 11, 2011 It's only one landmass monster I have Atk would be better but no this is strictly for defense Anyways thanks for the comment Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MibeR Posted May 11, 2011 Report Share Posted May 11, 2011 If you make the effect like that, you should add more Landmass monsters and made some combo DEF Deck. Just suggestion, you're welcome Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D.A._Sakuyamon Posted May 11, 2011 Author Report Share Posted May 11, 2011 [quote name='Maha Guns' timestamp='1305083464' post='5202309'] If you make the effect like that, you should add more Landmass monsters and made some combo DEF Deck. Just suggestion, you're welcome [/quote] I'm sure from seeing just this one card on what Landmasses are meant for. There like personal set card zone field spells but monsters. heres another adding to 1st post as well [img]http://img848.imageshack.us/img848/2462/101278l.jpg[/img] [spoiler=effect]The Monster Card Zone that this card is on counts as empty until 1 non "Landmass" monster is placed on it. This monster cannot attack if there is another monster on this Monster Card Zone. While this card is face-up on the field your opponent can only declare attacks to a monster on this Monster Card Zone. This monster destroys any monster it battles with. (There can only be 2 "Landmass" monsters on 1 Monster Card Zone at a time.)[/spoiler] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D.A._Sakuyamon Posted May 11, 2011 Author Report Share Posted May 11, 2011 bumps Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daft Punk Posted May 11, 2011 Report Share Posted May 11, 2011 Wait, if a monster on a Monster Card Zone with a Landmass monster on it is attacked, does it attack both or only the one that is on top? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D.A._Sakuyamon Posted May 12, 2011 Author Report Share Posted May 12, 2011 [quote name='Daft Punk' timestamp='1305156780' post='5203770'] Wait, if a monster on a Monster Card Zone with a Landmass monster on it is attacked, does it attack both or only the one that is on top? [/quote] just the top................though hmmm....................that could have advantages but nah would be worse for you in the end I think so just the top monster Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daft Punk Posted May 12, 2011 Report Share Posted May 12, 2011 [quote name='♥ D.A._ϯɨå Håʀʀɨbel ♥' timestamp='1305159887' post='5203901'] just the top................though hmmm....................that could have advantages but nah would be worse for you in the end I think so just the top monster [/quote] Alright then. The first is a decent card for more Defensive Monsters. The second one is also decent, however, the secondary effect is sort of confusing. Does it have to attack or the monster above it? Oh, and can the monster below declare an attack? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D.A._Sakuyamon Posted May 12, 2011 Author Report Share Posted May 12, 2011 [quote name='Daft Punk' timestamp='1305161623' post='5203965'] Alright then. The first is a decent card for more Defensive Monsters. The second one is also decent, however, the secondary effect is sort of confusing. Does it have to attack or the monster above it? Oh, and can the monster below declare an attack? [/quote] oops thats a typo, should say basically that the monster on it destroys any monster it battles with, good catch there Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D.A._Sakuyamon Posted May 13, 2011 Author Report Share Posted May 13, 2011 bump Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.