Master White Posted May 12, 2011 Report Share Posted May 12, 2011 [center] [img]http://imageshack.us/m/822/143/gbno87.png[/img] [b]Lore[/b] [i]When this card is Normal Summoned, you can activate the following effect: If your opponent Normal Summons or Special Summons 2 or more times in 1 turn, you can remove from play 1 card they control. When this card is Special Summoned, you can activate the following effect: Select 1 card in your opponent's Graveyard and add it to their hand. Then add 1 card from your Deck to your Hand. if this card is Normal Summoned and then Special Summoned in 1 turn, remove it from play during the End Phase. [/i] Effect Fix by Mr. Striker I give Credit to Renji for the Custom Attribute...Thanks Renji I made this template by myself and it might be a little off, but it looks good I hope...I like it.... [i]Note: I do not own the right font so this might have the wrong font in the mean time until I get money to get the right font, b/c in the US it is a commercial font and you have to buy it..... [/i] Now, Please Rate/hate/Comment with Nice Critique please..... [/center] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Master White Posted May 13, 2011 Author Report Share Posted May 13, 2011 Seriously, no comments and 35 views...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vough Posted May 13, 2011 Report Share Posted May 13, 2011 If it's a number, it has to be an exceed. If not, just rename it. Don't screw Zexal over. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Master White Posted May 14, 2011 Author Report Share Posted May 14, 2011 @Vough: You dork, there are other cards that are not numbers but have numbers in them.....hence Kurakuri monsters.....Its not meant to be exceed I will not make them unless for a contest.....it is a set that contains numbers..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted May 14, 2011 Report Share Posted May 14, 2011 out of curiosity, why give the 87 in the card name? I guess it would be considered balanced for lose a card then gain a card to your opponent 8.3/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Master White Posted May 14, 2011 Author Report Share Posted May 14, 2011 It was meant for 2 Reasons Ragnarock1945: 1: So it wouldn't be mistaken an exceed number card incorrectly as it was already did, I forgot they are only going to 99, so I need to add an 1 to it. 2nd: My set will be consisted of numbers for specifics. Really, it is balanced, hmm, maybe there isn't a card you can't Special Summon it already on the field. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greiga Posted May 14, 2011 Report Share Posted May 14, 2011 No. Monster. N No. Monster. Not an Exceed or Karakuri. Instant 6/10. EDIT: Actually read the effect. 3/10. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Master White Posted May 14, 2011 Author Report Share Posted May 14, 2011 @GreigaBeastDS: 1st:Again, I can make cards with no. without having it to be an exceed or a kurakuri or this is no longer Realistic Cards and has become [s][b]strict un-creative cards, please post boring dull effects here[/b][/s]..... 2nd: Also, I did say constructive criticism, and so you should post the reason why you rated, 3rd: Anyone that posts about the number again i will consider spam and give a warning unless the post is related to this one with common sense....Think about it, couldn't I have made this card before kurakuri's and exceeds came out, understand. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Love of Ghibli Posted May 14, 2011 Report Share Posted May 14, 2011 I didn't think it was an exceed, more like I thought it was an anti-exceed card which it really isn't. I guess the name is the only thing holding this card back from being perfect lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zextra Posted May 14, 2011 Report Share Posted May 14, 2011 [quote name='Vough' timestamp='1305298873' post='5205493'] If it's a number, it has to be an exceed. If not, just rename it. Don't screw Zexal over. [/quote] [quote name='GreigaBeastDS' timestamp='1305335479' post='5206704'] No. Monster. N No. Monster. Not an Exceed or Karakuri. Instant 6/10. EDIT: Actually read the effect. 3/10. [/quote] [quote name='Beginning446' timestamp='1305336590' post='5206742'] I didn't think it was an exceed, more like I thought it was an anti-exceed card which it really isn't. I guess the name is the only thing holding this card back from being perfect lol [/quote] Please don't bash on White because of some non-existent rule. It makes you look ignorant - he can do whatever he wants with it. There are no rules in the Rulebook that state that only Exceeds and Karakuris can have "No." in their name, and even the anime doesn't state that Exceeds are the only cards with "No." in them. Also, the "No." doesn't even come at the beginning if the card name, so you can't compare it to the Exceed monsters, which all have "No." before their names. @ Vough - Sorry to sound like a b*tch, but your comment doesn't really help the card. Therefore, it kinda seems like spam. @ GreigaBeastDS - Just because he used a "No." in his name doesn't mean you can immediately cut the rating down. Also, if you do, at least give an explanation for why you deducted further points. [quote] • Comments that only include a "rate" or a "good/bad" comment, without details given as to why you believe so. (eg. "#/10," "It's good.") [/quote] @ Beginning - while you did leave a compliment, you didn't really support why you thought it was good. @White - Now for the card itself, both effects are balanced, and I see nothing really "wrong" about the card. However, personally I'd prefer the Special Summon effect. However, though balanced, the effects seem slightly scattered. However, that's just my thoughts. 9/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
♠Decietful King♠ Posted May 14, 2011 Report Share Posted May 14, 2011 I agree with Zextra completely. He isn't ripping ZEXAL off and Vough and GreigaBeastDS both of your posts would be considered as spam. And personally I like the card all the effects are nice and balanced. The picture is very eye catching. You should have maybe changed the number to 52 since your monster has a deck of cards and well you know there is only 52 cards in a deck it would fit perfectly IMO. and I would think the only reason you wrote No. is because Number didn't fit in the card name area. So please hop off this person's back will you guys. I rate the card 8.6/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Love of Ghibli Posted May 14, 2011 Report Share Posted May 14, 2011 Its a good card because its normal summon effect is the perfect anti swarm effect. When it comes to aesthetics I agree with the above comment that 52 is a better number choice unless 87 has some other significance like another card named 87. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Master White Posted May 14, 2011 Author Report Share Posted May 14, 2011 [quote name='♠Decietful King♠' timestamp='1305341507' post='5206898'] I agree with Zextra completely. He isn't ripping ZEXAL off and Vough and GreigaBeastDS both of your posts would be considered as spam. And personally I like the card all the effects are nice and balanced. The picture is very eye catching. You should have maybe changed the number to 52 since your monster has a deck of cards and well you know there is only 52 cards in a deck it would fit perfectly IMO. and I would think the only reason you wrote No. is because Number didn't fit in the card name area. So please hop off this person's back will you guys. I rate the card 8.6/10 [/quote] Thank you very much for your support and from you as well Zextra.... @Decietful king: I'm going to take the number and change it to 52 with the playing cards Deck name at then End, meaning add Ace in it, so then people will understand, I'd hope.... Thanks Zextra, Decietful King, Beginning446, + rep for you all and I'm glad you liked it.... Okay, Well that means I can continue with my set, will be up hopefully soon... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.