chaosnuclear Posted May 13, 2011 Report Share Posted May 13, 2011 Jester Princess [img]http://img219.imageshack.us/img219/2537/183021.jpg[/img] [i]Lore: Pay 1500 Life Points to remove this card from your hand out of play to negate the activation of a card effect and remove it from play. Your opponent can pay 1500 Life Points to negate the effect of this card, if they do, draw 1 card.[/i] Ok this card is just for fun, and i guess its a bit broken, but il say this card is limited to 1, i accept any suggestions for this card to make it unbroken and also any ocg fixes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Love of Ghibli Posted May 13, 2011 Report Share Posted May 13, 2011 I don't think its broken at all, mainly because it only makes sense at one lol but it would be a staple I see nothing wrong with this card. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chaosnuclear Posted May 13, 2011 Author Report Share Posted May 13, 2011 thanks, lol i thought of that as well, i mean its nto that bad to put 2 of them, cause its a draw powered card and stuff like that but thanks, haha im going to make a Jester Set so lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Love of Ghibli Posted May 13, 2011 Report Share Posted May 13, 2011 I would love to see a jester set (not creative enough to continue the set lol) but two would be doable if it didn't have that draw power lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chaosnuclear Posted May 13, 2011 Author Report Share Posted May 13, 2011 lol Yes i will do it pretty soon, im just thinking of the effects right now but lol, yes ur right haha but isnt this a great card to have lol a big saver Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chaosnuclear Posted May 14, 2011 Author Report Share Posted May 14, 2011 bump Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MibeR Posted May 14, 2011 Report Share Posted May 14, 2011 Warning with drawback advantage, sure this is useful. Not see it is imbalanced though. But draw 1 card for the last effect would be wise Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mugendramon Posted May 14, 2011 Report Share Posted May 14, 2011 Sure, reducing both player's Life by 2000 and using Pot of Greed is not broken. Sure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chaosnuclear Posted May 14, 2011 Author Report Share Posted May 14, 2011 its not as broken as u may thing BlindMonkey, i mean the opponent can negate it as well, but i change the draw to 1 card instead, do you guys think its better? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted May 14, 2011 Report Share Posted May 14, 2011 it's not broken at all, though it really has to depend on the card personally I still feel 2000 LP pay is a bit too high, maybe drop it down to 1500 instead? 8/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chaosnuclear Posted May 14, 2011 Author Report Share Posted May 14, 2011 1500? wait for the negate or both? i was thinking that too, but i was feeling like 1500 Lifepoints seems an odd number, like u always see 800 or 1000 Lifepoints paid or something like that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted May 14, 2011 Report Share Posted May 14, 2011 well for me 1000 LP is a bit too low and certainly 800 is WAY too cheap Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chaosnuclear Posted May 14, 2011 Author Report Share Posted May 14, 2011 i know thats what i was thinking as well, but like you get what i ment right? like 1500 seems an odd number? but il change it anywaays Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MibeR Posted May 15, 2011 Report Share Posted May 15, 2011 1500 to 1, is wise IMO. 9/10, keep it like that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted May 15, 2011 Report Share Posted May 15, 2011 good, you modified it to 1500, so now I can up the rating to 9.5/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chaosnuclear Posted May 15, 2011 Author Report Share Posted May 15, 2011 thanks, would this be a life saver card? haha, anyways thanks for your help guys, and i have to edit the pics Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ieyasu Tokugawa Posted May 15, 2011 Report Share Posted May 15, 2011 The reason it was broken before is because your opponent basically chooses whether you get a solemn warning or a pot of greed, one of which is banned and the other which is semi'd. As it is now, it seems more balanced. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chaosnuclear Posted May 15, 2011 Author Report Share Posted May 15, 2011 thanks!, i edited it some, haha Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.