Valkyrus Posted May 15, 2011 Report Share Posted May 15, 2011 So this is the first of my "Steamro" monsters. A new Archetype of FIRE Machine-Type monsters. Their effects are based mainly on negating card effects and easily boosting their ATK. So here's the first monster: [spoiler][IMG]http://i207.photobucket.com/albums/bb278/mario1092/stemp.jpg[/IMG][/spoiler] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Valkyrus Posted May 15, 2011 Author Report Share Posted May 15, 2011 BUMP Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
♠Decietful King♠ Posted May 15, 2011 Report Share Posted May 15, 2011 *Begins to drool* I must have picture T.T lol But the card itself is rather OP'ed IMO the double ATK effect makes it rather impossible to beat when you attack and it WILL cause massive damage to your opponent when it attacks. And it has a guard effect against be destroyed which makes it rather unstoppable. Thats just a humble mans opinion. My Rate ~6/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Valkyrus Posted May 15, 2011 Author Report Share Posted May 15, 2011 [quote name='♠Decietful King♠' timestamp='1305481298' post='5210443'] *Begins to drool* I must have picture T.T lol But the card itself is rather OP'ed IMO the double ATK effect makes it rather impossible to beat when you attack and it WILL cause massive damage to your opponent when it attacks. And it has a guard effect against be destroyed which makes it rather unstoppable. Thats just a humble mans opinion. My Rate ~6/10 [/quote] but Red Nova dragon is easier to summon than this (and both cards are double tuning synchros) and it has at least 5000 ATK, also for red nova, it's not even once per turn. D": Red Nova has effects against being destroyed as well~ D": anyways, thanks for the comment ^^ btw, attached the picture for you~ credit goes to Mr Jack on deviantart. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
♠Decietful King♠ Posted May 15, 2011 Report Share Posted May 15, 2011 [quote name='Gandorator' timestamp='1305481887' post='5210460'] but Red Nova dragon is easier to summon than this (and both cards are double tuning synchros) and it has at least 5000 ATK, also for red nova, it's not even once per turn. D": Red Nova has effects against being destroyed as well~ D": anyways, thanks for the comment ^^ btw, attached the picture for you~ credit goes to Mr Jack on deviantart. [/quote] Oh I found the picture and I know Red Nova is extremely OP'ed this card isn't there yet. And it really is kinda harder to summon Red Nova. Since you already start with a level 8 monster as a requirement this monster is substantially easier to Summon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted May 15, 2011 Report Share Posted May 15, 2011 doubling the attack is too much, you didn't even say it can't attack directly and that makes it WAY too easy for OTK set ups I'd have changed it to just boosting its atk by 1000 or something 3500 atk is reasonable for lv10, after all 6.4/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Valkyrus Posted May 16, 2011 Author Report Share Posted May 16, 2011 [quote name='ragnarok1945' timestamp='1305491955' post='5210855'] doubling the attack is too much, you didn't even say it can't attack directly and that makes it WAY too easy for OTK set ups I'd have changed it to just boosting its atk by 1000 or something 3500 atk is reasonable for lv10, after all 6.4/10 [/quote] this is a double-tuning synchro (same as Red Nova, but even harder to summon than Red Nova) and giving it a 5000 atk once per turn is OP'd? When Red Nova has AT LEAST 5000 atk base? :/ I'm not sure.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted May 16, 2011 Report Share Posted May 16, 2011 yeah well Red Nova Dragon was OPed as hell already, surprised they made it that way for a synchro (OPe by their standards as well) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.