towitori Posted May 18, 2011 Report Share Posted May 18, 2011 [center][img]http://img16.imageshack.us/img16/9296/414924.jpg[/img] [i] This card's ATK cannot exceed to its original ATK. Negate any Trap Cards that targets this card and destroy it. Once per turn, If this card destroys a monster by battle and sends it to the Graveyard, this card can attack once more in the same Battle Phase.[/i] Comments Please![/center] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginko Posted May 18, 2011 Report Share Posted May 18, 2011 negate the activation of a trap card that targets this monster and destroy it very well done. i like it. don't know if it would go well with any particular set, but it's pretty cool Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
towitori Posted May 18, 2011 Author Report Share Posted May 18, 2011 thanks!more comments pls. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Sleeping Dude Posted May 19, 2011 Report Share Posted May 19, 2011 Cool! Good with Flamvells! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AKIO DAISUKE Posted May 19, 2011 Report Share Posted May 19, 2011 Pretty broken for a Level 4 2300/200 FIRE monster. Flamvellaholics would love this card. lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CDDRodrigo Posted May 19, 2011 Report Share Posted May 19, 2011 Broken. Level 4 with these stats and such epic effects is just a no-no. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Sleeping Dude Posted May 19, 2011 Report Share Posted May 19, 2011 Well 1st effect is like a drawback for me but i agree a little with above Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted May 19, 2011 Report Share Posted May 19, 2011 for the ability to attack a 2nd time, you should say it can't attack your opponent directly in the 2nd attack otherwise for 2300 atk this is too much 7.5/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.