Anti-Apocryphal Posted May 30, 2011 Report Share Posted May 30, 2011 [center][img]http://img805.imageshack.us/img805/4816/205642.jpg[/img] [i]Activate only when your opponent declares a direct attack. Negate the attack and destroy the monster. Then, pay 600 Life Points to Special Summon 3 "Sun Orb" Tokens (LIGHT/Lv. 4/Fairy/ATK 0/DEF 0) in Defense Position. These tokens cannot attack or change position. While there is 1 or more "Sun Orb" Tokens on the field, your opponent cannot select another attack target except "Sun Orb" Tokens.[/i] [spoiler=Note] I know that the picture didn't show up well because it's JPEG, while the original is PNG.[/spoiler][/center] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Classic Posted May 30, 2011 Report Share Posted May 30, 2011 [b][color="#8B0000"][center]Minor OCG error you said destroy the monster, where it would either be 'the attacking monster' or 'that monster, pic is good I've never favored pace pictures though :/, Would go well in my stall-and-piss-my-opponent-off-deck. xD. You May want to put 'Tokens cannot be used as Tributes' but that's your choice. Good card Overall: 7.9/10 OCG Fix (corrections in bold):[/color][/b] [center]Activate only when your opponent declares a direct attack. Negate the attack and destroy the [b]attacking[/b] monster. Then, pay 600 Life Points to Special Summon 3 "Sun Orb" Tokens (LIGHT/Lv. 4/Fairy/ATK 0/DEF 0) in Defense Position. These tokens cannot attack or change position. While there is 1 or more "Sun Orb" Tokens on the field, your opponent cannot select another attack target except "Sun Orb" Tokens. [/center][/center] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
newhat Posted May 30, 2011 Report Share Posted May 30, 2011 Seems like a better Sakuretsu Armor. This should probably be a Normal Trap Card, like Spider Egg (which this card completely outclasses, by the way). Are paying the Life Points and Special Summoning the Tokens mandatory? Either way, this card is slightly overpowered; it gives the same field advantage as Scapegoat, but without the Tribute restriction and with a special protective ability. How about 1 Token for each monster your opponent controls? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted May 30, 2011 Report Share Posted May 30, 2011 shame you didn't say they can't be used for synchro food I guess it's ok for you to leave that part in, but just paying 600 LP is virtually nothing for that summoning, make the LP cost higher 8.3/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anti-Apocryphal Posted May 31, 2011 Author Report Share Posted May 31, 2011 How about 900 LP? @Classic- I looked over that and still didn't see that. Thanks. xD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boss Z Posted May 31, 2011 Report Share Posted May 31, 2011 Counter Spell?? And 600 seems so small for the effect, maybe 1000? Or maybe 800? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anti-Apocryphal Posted May 31, 2011 Author Report Share Posted May 31, 2011 How about 900 for an even 300 a piece? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boss Z Posted May 31, 2011 Report Share Posted May 31, 2011 The ratio doesn't need to exist, most cards cost 800 points or deal 800 points, its just some number that Konami Likes [color="#FFFFFF"](namely because then it take 10 Effects)[/color] 600 and 700 would both be too low, anything over 1000 is too much, you decide Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted May 31, 2011 Report Share Posted May 31, 2011 [quote name='Future Paradise' timestamp='1306803195' post='5243143'] How about 900 LP? @Classic- I looked over that and still didn't see that. Thanks. xD [/quote] it should be between 1000 to 1500 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anti-Apocryphal Posted June 1, 2011 Author Report Share Posted June 1, 2011 Possibly a 1200 cost, then? I think that's fair enough. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Classic Posted June 1, 2011 Report Share Posted June 1, 2011 [center][b][color="#8B0000"]@ Future paradise I meant throw 'attacking', in or change 'the' to 'that'. Otherwise its grammatically incorrect.[/color][/b][/center] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted June 1, 2011 Report Share Posted June 1, 2011 [quote name='Future Paradise' timestamp='1306890341' post='5245508'] Possibly a 1200 cost, then? I think that's fair enough. [/quote] yeah do that, it'd be fine with me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anti-Apocryphal Posted June 1, 2011 Author Report Share Posted June 1, 2011 So it'd be "...attacking monster..."? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted June 1, 2011 Report Share Posted June 1, 2011 along those lines yes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anti-Apocryphal Posted June 1, 2011 Author Report Share Posted June 1, 2011 Alright. If there's anything else incorrect, just let me know. Because I think that's all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Classic Posted June 1, 2011 Report Share Posted June 1, 2011 [color="#8B0000"][center][b]Yes it would either be 'Negate the attack and destroy the attacking monster' Or 'Negate the attack and destroy that monster' [/b][/center][/color] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nghtwing Posted June 1, 2011 Report Share Posted June 1, 2011 I liked the pic, and the effect is good! Though, I think that you could balance it taking out the part of destroying the attacking monster or increasing life cost ... well, it's just my opinion Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anti-Apocryphal Posted June 2, 2011 Author Report Share Posted June 2, 2011 Thanks to everybody for their comments. =D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SirtyStan Posted June 2, 2011 Report Share Posted June 2, 2011 Just gonna say, you should change it to "You may pay 600 Life Points..." because that card kill you. Or is it a downside? Anyways, this card is a little OP'ed. Maybe add a downside like "Each time a "Sun Orb" Token you control is destroyed, send the top 2 crds of your deck tothe Graveyard." I like the picture, but it's missing a little something... 8.2/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anti-Apocryphal Posted June 4, 2011 Author Report Share Posted June 4, 2011 Thank you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.